Cargando…

Delays in Epidemic Outbreak Control Cost Disproportionately Large Treatment Footprints to Offset

Epidemic outbreak control often involves a spatially explicit treatment area (quarantine, inoculation, ring cull) that covers the outbreak area and adjacent regions where hosts are thought to be latently infected. Emphasis on space however neglects the influence of treatment timing on outbreak contr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Severns, Paul M., Mundt, Christopher C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9030382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35456068
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11040393
_version_ 1784692125368057856
author Severns, Paul M.
Mundt, Christopher C.
author_facet Severns, Paul M.
Mundt, Christopher C.
author_sort Severns, Paul M.
collection PubMed
description Epidemic outbreak control often involves a spatially explicit treatment area (quarantine, inoculation, ring cull) that covers the outbreak area and adjacent regions where hosts are thought to be latently infected. Emphasis on space however neglects the influence of treatment timing on outbreak control. We conducted field and in silico experiments with wheat stripe rust (WSR), a long-distance dispersed plant disease, to understand interactions between treatment timing and area interact to suppress an outbreak. Full-factorial field experiments with three different ring culls (outbreak area only to a 25-fold increase in treatment area) at three different disease control timings (1.125, 1.25, and 1.5 latent periods after initial disease expression) indicated that earlier treatment timing had a conspicuously greater suppressive effect than the area treated. Disease spread computer simulations over a broad range of influential epidemic parameter values (R(0), outbreak disease prevalence, epidemic duration) suggested that potentially unrealistically large increases in treatment area would be required to compensate for even small delays in treatment timing. Although disease surveillance programs are costly, our results suggest that treatments early in an epidemic disease outbreak require smaller areas to be effective, which may ultimately compensate for the upfront costs of proactive disease surveillance programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9030382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90303822022-04-23 Delays in Epidemic Outbreak Control Cost Disproportionately Large Treatment Footprints to Offset Severns, Paul M. Mundt, Christopher C. Pathogens Article Epidemic outbreak control often involves a spatially explicit treatment area (quarantine, inoculation, ring cull) that covers the outbreak area and adjacent regions where hosts are thought to be latently infected. Emphasis on space however neglects the influence of treatment timing on outbreak control. We conducted field and in silico experiments with wheat stripe rust (WSR), a long-distance dispersed plant disease, to understand interactions between treatment timing and area interact to suppress an outbreak. Full-factorial field experiments with three different ring culls (outbreak area only to a 25-fold increase in treatment area) at three different disease control timings (1.125, 1.25, and 1.5 latent periods after initial disease expression) indicated that earlier treatment timing had a conspicuously greater suppressive effect than the area treated. Disease spread computer simulations over a broad range of influential epidemic parameter values (R(0), outbreak disease prevalence, epidemic duration) suggested that potentially unrealistically large increases in treatment area would be required to compensate for even small delays in treatment timing. Although disease surveillance programs are costly, our results suggest that treatments early in an epidemic disease outbreak require smaller areas to be effective, which may ultimately compensate for the upfront costs of proactive disease surveillance programs. MDPI 2022-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9030382/ /pubmed/35456068 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11040393 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Severns, Paul M.
Mundt, Christopher C.
Delays in Epidemic Outbreak Control Cost Disproportionately Large Treatment Footprints to Offset
title Delays in Epidemic Outbreak Control Cost Disproportionately Large Treatment Footprints to Offset
title_full Delays in Epidemic Outbreak Control Cost Disproportionately Large Treatment Footprints to Offset
title_fullStr Delays in Epidemic Outbreak Control Cost Disproportionately Large Treatment Footprints to Offset
title_full_unstemmed Delays in Epidemic Outbreak Control Cost Disproportionately Large Treatment Footprints to Offset
title_short Delays in Epidemic Outbreak Control Cost Disproportionately Large Treatment Footprints to Offset
title_sort delays in epidemic outbreak control cost disproportionately large treatment footprints to offset
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9030382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35456068
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11040393
work_keys_str_mv AT severnspaulm delaysinepidemicoutbreakcontrolcostdisproportionatelylargetreatmentfootprintstooffset
AT mundtchristopherc delaysinepidemicoutbreakcontrolcostdisproportionatelylargetreatmentfootprintstooffset