Cargando…
Delays in Epidemic Outbreak Control Cost Disproportionately Large Treatment Footprints to Offset
Epidemic outbreak control often involves a spatially explicit treatment area (quarantine, inoculation, ring cull) that covers the outbreak area and adjacent regions where hosts are thought to be latently infected. Emphasis on space however neglects the influence of treatment timing on outbreak contr...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9030382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35456068 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11040393 |
_version_ | 1784692125368057856 |
---|---|
author | Severns, Paul M. Mundt, Christopher C. |
author_facet | Severns, Paul M. Mundt, Christopher C. |
author_sort | Severns, Paul M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Epidemic outbreak control often involves a spatially explicit treatment area (quarantine, inoculation, ring cull) that covers the outbreak area and adjacent regions where hosts are thought to be latently infected. Emphasis on space however neglects the influence of treatment timing on outbreak control. We conducted field and in silico experiments with wheat stripe rust (WSR), a long-distance dispersed plant disease, to understand interactions between treatment timing and area interact to suppress an outbreak. Full-factorial field experiments with three different ring culls (outbreak area only to a 25-fold increase in treatment area) at three different disease control timings (1.125, 1.25, and 1.5 latent periods after initial disease expression) indicated that earlier treatment timing had a conspicuously greater suppressive effect than the area treated. Disease spread computer simulations over a broad range of influential epidemic parameter values (R(0), outbreak disease prevalence, epidemic duration) suggested that potentially unrealistically large increases in treatment area would be required to compensate for even small delays in treatment timing. Although disease surveillance programs are costly, our results suggest that treatments early in an epidemic disease outbreak require smaller areas to be effective, which may ultimately compensate for the upfront costs of proactive disease surveillance programs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9030382 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90303822022-04-23 Delays in Epidemic Outbreak Control Cost Disproportionately Large Treatment Footprints to Offset Severns, Paul M. Mundt, Christopher C. Pathogens Article Epidemic outbreak control often involves a spatially explicit treatment area (quarantine, inoculation, ring cull) that covers the outbreak area and adjacent regions where hosts are thought to be latently infected. Emphasis on space however neglects the influence of treatment timing on outbreak control. We conducted field and in silico experiments with wheat stripe rust (WSR), a long-distance dispersed plant disease, to understand interactions between treatment timing and area interact to suppress an outbreak. Full-factorial field experiments with three different ring culls (outbreak area only to a 25-fold increase in treatment area) at three different disease control timings (1.125, 1.25, and 1.5 latent periods after initial disease expression) indicated that earlier treatment timing had a conspicuously greater suppressive effect than the area treated. Disease spread computer simulations over a broad range of influential epidemic parameter values (R(0), outbreak disease prevalence, epidemic duration) suggested that potentially unrealistically large increases in treatment area would be required to compensate for even small delays in treatment timing. Although disease surveillance programs are costly, our results suggest that treatments early in an epidemic disease outbreak require smaller areas to be effective, which may ultimately compensate for the upfront costs of proactive disease surveillance programs. MDPI 2022-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9030382/ /pubmed/35456068 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11040393 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Severns, Paul M. Mundt, Christopher C. Delays in Epidemic Outbreak Control Cost Disproportionately Large Treatment Footprints to Offset |
title | Delays in Epidemic Outbreak Control Cost Disproportionately Large Treatment Footprints to Offset |
title_full | Delays in Epidemic Outbreak Control Cost Disproportionately Large Treatment Footprints to Offset |
title_fullStr | Delays in Epidemic Outbreak Control Cost Disproportionately Large Treatment Footprints to Offset |
title_full_unstemmed | Delays in Epidemic Outbreak Control Cost Disproportionately Large Treatment Footprints to Offset |
title_short | Delays in Epidemic Outbreak Control Cost Disproportionately Large Treatment Footprints to Offset |
title_sort | delays in epidemic outbreak control cost disproportionately large treatment footprints to offset |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9030382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35456068 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11040393 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT severnspaulm delaysinepidemicoutbreakcontrolcostdisproportionatelylargetreatmentfootprintstooffset AT mundtchristopherc delaysinepidemicoutbreakcontrolcostdisproportionatelylargetreatmentfootprintstooffset |