Cargando…
Best Fit 3D Basilar Membrane Reconstruction to Routinely Assess the Scalar Position of the Electrode Array after Cochlear Implantation
The scalar position of the electrode array is assumed to be associated with auditory performance after cochlear implantation. We propose a new method that can be routinely applied in clinical practice to assess the position of an electrode array. Ten basilar membrane templates were generated using m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9030636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35456169 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11082075 |
_version_ | 1784692190523424768 |
---|---|
author | Torres, Renato Tinevez, Jean-Yves Daoudi, Hannah Lahlou, Ghizlene Grislain, Neil Breil, Eugénie Sterkers, Olivier Mosnier, Isabelle Nguyen, Yann Ferrary, Evelyne |
author_facet | Torres, Renato Tinevez, Jean-Yves Daoudi, Hannah Lahlou, Ghizlene Grislain, Neil Breil, Eugénie Sterkers, Olivier Mosnier, Isabelle Nguyen, Yann Ferrary, Evelyne |
author_sort | Torres, Renato |
collection | PubMed |
description | The scalar position of the electrode array is assumed to be associated with auditory performance after cochlear implantation. We propose a new method that can be routinely applied in clinical practice to assess the position of an electrode array. Ten basilar membrane templates were generated using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), based on the dimensions of 100 cochleae. Five surgeons were blinded to determine the position of the electrode array in 30 cadaveric cochleae. The procedure consisted of selecting the appropriate template based on cochlear dimensions, merging the electrode array reconstruction with the template using four landmarks, determining the position of the array according to the template position, and comparing the results obtained to histology data. The time taken to analyze each implanted cochlea was approximately 12 min. We found that, according to histology, surgeons were in almost perfect agreement when determining an electrode translocated to the scala vestibuli with the perimodiolar MidScala array (Fleiss’ kappa (κ) = 0.82), and in moderate agreement when using the lateral wall EVO array (κ = 0.42). Our data indicate that an adapted basilar membrane template can be used as a rapid and reproducible method to assess the position of the electrode array after cochlear implantation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9030636 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90306362022-04-23 Best Fit 3D Basilar Membrane Reconstruction to Routinely Assess the Scalar Position of the Electrode Array after Cochlear Implantation Torres, Renato Tinevez, Jean-Yves Daoudi, Hannah Lahlou, Ghizlene Grislain, Neil Breil, Eugénie Sterkers, Olivier Mosnier, Isabelle Nguyen, Yann Ferrary, Evelyne J Clin Med Article The scalar position of the electrode array is assumed to be associated with auditory performance after cochlear implantation. We propose a new method that can be routinely applied in clinical practice to assess the position of an electrode array. Ten basilar membrane templates were generated using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), based on the dimensions of 100 cochleae. Five surgeons were blinded to determine the position of the electrode array in 30 cadaveric cochleae. The procedure consisted of selecting the appropriate template based on cochlear dimensions, merging the electrode array reconstruction with the template using four landmarks, determining the position of the array according to the template position, and comparing the results obtained to histology data. The time taken to analyze each implanted cochlea was approximately 12 min. We found that, according to histology, surgeons were in almost perfect agreement when determining an electrode translocated to the scala vestibuli with the perimodiolar MidScala array (Fleiss’ kappa (κ) = 0.82), and in moderate agreement when using the lateral wall EVO array (κ = 0.42). Our data indicate that an adapted basilar membrane template can be used as a rapid and reproducible method to assess the position of the electrode array after cochlear implantation. MDPI 2022-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9030636/ /pubmed/35456169 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11082075 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Torres, Renato Tinevez, Jean-Yves Daoudi, Hannah Lahlou, Ghizlene Grislain, Neil Breil, Eugénie Sterkers, Olivier Mosnier, Isabelle Nguyen, Yann Ferrary, Evelyne Best Fit 3D Basilar Membrane Reconstruction to Routinely Assess the Scalar Position of the Electrode Array after Cochlear Implantation |
title | Best Fit 3D Basilar Membrane Reconstruction to Routinely Assess the Scalar Position of the Electrode Array after Cochlear Implantation |
title_full | Best Fit 3D Basilar Membrane Reconstruction to Routinely Assess the Scalar Position of the Electrode Array after Cochlear Implantation |
title_fullStr | Best Fit 3D Basilar Membrane Reconstruction to Routinely Assess the Scalar Position of the Electrode Array after Cochlear Implantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Best Fit 3D Basilar Membrane Reconstruction to Routinely Assess the Scalar Position of the Electrode Array after Cochlear Implantation |
title_short | Best Fit 3D Basilar Membrane Reconstruction to Routinely Assess the Scalar Position of the Electrode Array after Cochlear Implantation |
title_sort | best fit 3d basilar membrane reconstruction to routinely assess the scalar position of the electrode array after cochlear implantation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9030636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35456169 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11082075 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT torresrenato bestfit3dbasilarmembranereconstructiontoroutinelyassessthescalarpositionoftheelectrodearrayaftercochlearimplantation AT tinevezjeanyves bestfit3dbasilarmembranereconstructiontoroutinelyassessthescalarpositionoftheelectrodearrayaftercochlearimplantation AT daoudihannah bestfit3dbasilarmembranereconstructiontoroutinelyassessthescalarpositionoftheelectrodearrayaftercochlearimplantation AT lahloughizlene bestfit3dbasilarmembranereconstructiontoroutinelyassessthescalarpositionoftheelectrodearrayaftercochlearimplantation AT grislainneil bestfit3dbasilarmembranereconstructiontoroutinelyassessthescalarpositionoftheelectrodearrayaftercochlearimplantation AT breileugenie bestfit3dbasilarmembranereconstructiontoroutinelyassessthescalarpositionoftheelectrodearrayaftercochlearimplantation AT sterkersolivier bestfit3dbasilarmembranereconstructiontoroutinelyassessthescalarpositionoftheelectrodearrayaftercochlearimplantation AT mosnierisabelle bestfit3dbasilarmembranereconstructiontoroutinelyassessthescalarpositionoftheelectrodearrayaftercochlearimplantation AT nguyenyann bestfit3dbasilarmembranereconstructiontoroutinelyassessthescalarpositionoftheelectrodearrayaftercochlearimplantation AT ferraryevelyne bestfit3dbasilarmembranereconstructiontoroutinelyassessthescalarpositionoftheelectrodearrayaftercochlearimplantation |