Cargando…
Biorecognition Engineering Technologies for Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Literature Review of Non-Conventional and Plausible Sensor Development Methods
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Approximately 70% of patients with cancer are diagnosed at late stages of the disease in developing countries. This is partly owed to the restricted access to cost-effective and accurate diagnostic tools in healthcare systems. Biosensor diagnostic tools based on conventional antibodi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9030888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35454775 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14081867 |
_version_ | 1784692254123753472 |
---|---|
author | Mayoral-Peña, Kalaumari González Peña, Omar Israel Orrantia Clark, Alexia María Flores-Vallejo, Rosario del Carmen Oza, Goldie Sharma, Ashutosh De Donato, Marcos |
author_facet | Mayoral-Peña, Kalaumari González Peña, Omar Israel Orrantia Clark, Alexia María Flores-Vallejo, Rosario del Carmen Oza, Goldie Sharma, Ashutosh De Donato, Marcos |
author_sort | Mayoral-Peña, Kalaumari |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Approximately 70% of patients with cancer are diagnosed at late stages of the disease in developing countries. This is partly owed to the restricted access to cost-effective and accurate diagnostic tools in healthcare systems. Biosensor diagnostic tools based on conventional antibodies have been a valuable option for creating accessible detection systems for cancer. However, antibodies have certain limitations related to cost, stability, and applicability. The latter promoted the research and development of alternative approaches to generating molecules and molecule-based scaffolds with similar biorecognition properties to antibodies (non-conventional technologies). This review aimed to present and analyze the current trends of three of these emerging non-conventional technologies for biorecognition engineering in cancer diagnostics, named: molecularly imprinted polymers, recombinant antibodies, and antibody mimetic molecules. These non-conventional technologies are promising, relevant, and more accessible alternatives to conventional antibodies in developing cancer biosensors and worthy of being acknowledged by the scientific community, especially for their use in point-of-care cancer diagnostics in developing countries. ABSTRACT: Cancer is the second cause of mortality worldwide. Early diagnosis of this multifactorial disease is challenging, especially in populations with limited access to healthcare services. A vast repertoire of cancer biomarkers has been studied to facilitate early diagnosis; particularly, the use of antibodies against these biomarkers has been of interest to detect them through biorecognition. However, there are certain limitations to this approach. Emerging biorecognition engineering technologies are alternative methods to generate molecules and molecule-based scaffolds with similar properties to those presented by antibodies. Molecularly imprinted polymers, recombinant antibodies, and antibody mimetic molecules are three novel technologies commonly used in scientific studies. This review aimed to present the fundamentals of these technologies and address questions about how they are implemented for cancer detection in recent scientific studies. A systematic analysis of the scientific peer-reviewed literature regarding the use of these technologies on cancer detection was carried out starting from the year 2000 up to 2021 to answer these questions. In total, 131 scientific articles indexed in the Web of Science from the last three years were included in this analysis. The results showed that antibody mimetic molecules technology was the biorecognition technology with the highest number of reports. The most studied cancer types were: multiple, breast, leukemia, colorectal, and lung. Electrochemical and optical detection methods were the most frequently used. Finally, the most analyzed biomarkers and cancer entities in the studies were carcinoembryonic antigen, MCF-7 cells, and exosomes. These technologies are emerging tools with adequate performance for developing biosensors useful in cancer detection, which can be used to improve cancer diagnosis in developing countries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9030888 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90308882022-04-23 Biorecognition Engineering Technologies for Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Literature Review of Non-Conventional and Plausible Sensor Development Methods Mayoral-Peña, Kalaumari González Peña, Omar Israel Orrantia Clark, Alexia María Flores-Vallejo, Rosario del Carmen Oza, Goldie Sharma, Ashutosh De Donato, Marcos Cancers (Basel) Systematic Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Approximately 70% of patients with cancer are diagnosed at late stages of the disease in developing countries. This is partly owed to the restricted access to cost-effective and accurate diagnostic tools in healthcare systems. Biosensor diagnostic tools based on conventional antibodies have been a valuable option for creating accessible detection systems for cancer. However, antibodies have certain limitations related to cost, stability, and applicability. The latter promoted the research and development of alternative approaches to generating molecules and molecule-based scaffolds with similar biorecognition properties to antibodies (non-conventional technologies). This review aimed to present and analyze the current trends of three of these emerging non-conventional technologies for biorecognition engineering in cancer diagnostics, named: molecularly imprinted polymers, recombinant antibodies, and antibody mimetic molecules. These non-conventional technologies are promising, relevant, and more accessible alternatives to conventional antibodies in developing cancer biosensors and worthy of being acknowledged by the scientific community, especially for their use in point-of-care cancer diagnostics in developing countries. ABSTRACT: Cancer is the second cause of mortality worldwide. Early diagnosis of this multifactorial disease is challenging, especially in populations with limited access to healthcare services. A vast repertoire of cancer biomarkers has been studied to facilitate early diagnosis; particularly, the use of antibodies against these biomarkers has been of interest to detect them through biorecognition. However, there are certain limitations to this approach. Emerging biorecognition engineering technologies are alternative methods to generate molecules and molecule-based scaffolds with similar properties to those presented by antibodies. Molecularly imprinted polymers, recombinant antibodies, and antibody mimetic molecules are three novel technologies commonly used in scientific studies. This review aimed to present the fundamentals of these technologies and address questions about how they are implemented for cancer detection in recent scientific studies. A systematic analysis of the scientific peer-reviewed literature regarding the use of these technologies on cancer detection was carried out starting from the year 2000 up to 2021 to answer these questions. In total, 131 scientific articles indexed in the Web of Science from the last three years were included in this analysis. The results showed that antibody mimetic molecules technology was the biorecognition technology with the highest number of reports. The most studied cancer types were: multiple, breast, leukemia, colorectal, and lung. Electrochemical and optical detection methods were the most frequently used. Finally, the most analyzed biomarkers and cancer entities in the studies were carcinoembryonic antigen, MCF-7 cells, and exosomes. These technologies are emerging tools with adequate performance for developing biosensors useful in cancer detection, which can be used to improve cancer diagnosis in developing countries. MDPI 2022-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9030888/ /pubmed/35454775 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14081867 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Mayoral-Peña, Kalaumari González Peña, Omar Israel Orrantia Clark, Alexia María Flores-Vallejo, Rosario del Carmen Oza, Goldie Sharma, Ashutosh De Donato, Marcos Biorecognition Engineering Technologies for Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Literature Review of Non-Conventional and Plausible Sensor Development Methods |
title | Biorecognition Engineering Technologies for Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Literature Review of Non-Conventional and Plausible Sensor Development Methods |
title_full | Biorecognition Engineering Technologies for Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Literature Review of Non-Conventional and Plausible Sensor Development Methods |
title_fullStr | Biorecognition Engineering Technologies for Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Literature Review of Non-Conventional and Plausible Sensor Development Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Biorecognition Engineering Technologies for Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Literature Review of Non-Conventional and Plausible Sensor Development Methods |
title_short | Biorecognition Engineering Technologies for Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Literature Review of Non-Conventional and Plausible Sensor Development Methods |
title_sort | biorecognition engineering technologies for cancer diagnosis: a systematic literature review of non-conventional and plausible sensor development methods |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9030888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35454775 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14081867 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mayoralpenakalaumari biorecognitionengineeringtechnologiesforcancerdiagnosisasystematicliteraturereviewofnonconventionalandplausiblesensordevelopmentmethods AT gonzalezpenaomarisrael biorecognitionengineeringtechnologiesforcancerdiagnosisasystematicliteraturereviewofnonconventionalandplausiblesensordevelopmentmethods AT orrantiaclarkalexiamaria biorecognitionengineeringtechnologiesforcancerdiagnosisasystematicliteraturereviewofnonconventionalandplausiblesensordevelopmentmethods AT floresvallejorosariodelcarmen biorecognitionengineeringtechnologiesforcancerdiagnosisasystematicliteraturereviewofnonconventionalandplausiblesensordevelopmentmethods AT ozagoldie biorecognitionengineeringtechnologiesforcancerdiagnosisasystematicliteraturereviewofnonconventionalandplausiblesensordevelopmentmethods AT sharmaashutosh biorecognitionengineeringtechnologiesforcancerdiagnosisasystematicliteraturereviewofnonconventionalandplausiblesensordevelopmentmethods AT dedonatomarcos biorecognitionengineeringtechnologiesforcancerdiagnosisasystematicliteraturereviewofnonconventionalandplausiblesensordevelopmentmethods |