Cargando…

Combinatorial Power of cfDNA, CTCs and EVs in Oncology

Liquid biopsy is a promising technique for clinical management of oncological patients. The diversity of analytes circulating in the blood useable for liquid biopsy testing is enormous. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and extracellular vesicles (EVs), as well as blood cells and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keup, Corinna, Kimmig, Rainer, Kasimir-Bauer, Sabine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9031112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35453918
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12040870
_version_ 1784692308961132544
author Keup, Corinna
Kimmig, Rainer
Kasimir-Bauer, Sabine
author_facet Keup, Corinna
Kimmig, Rainer
Kasimir-Bauer, Sabine
author_sort Keup, Corinna
collection PubMed
description Liquid biopsy is a promising technique for clinical management of oncological patients. The diversity of analytes circulating in the blood useable for liquid biopsy testing is enormous. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and extracellular vesicles (EVs), as well as blood cells and other soluble components in the plasma, were shown as liquid biopsy analytes. A few studies directly comparing two liquid biopsy analytes showed a benefit of one analyte over the other, while most authors concluded the benefit of the additional analyte. Only three years ago, the first studies to examine the value of a characterization of more than two liquid biopsy analytes from the same sample were conducted. We attempt to reflect on the recent development of multimodal liquid biopsy testing in this review. Although the analytes and clinical purposes of the published multimodal studies differed significantly, the additive value of the analytes was concluded in almost all projects. Thus, the blood components, as liquid biopsy reservoirs, are complementary rather than competitive, and orthogonal data sets were even shown to harbor synergistic effects. The unmistakable potential of multimodal liquid biopsy testing, however, is dampened by its clinical utility, which is yet to be proven, the lack of methodical standardization and insufficiently mature reimbursement, logistics and data handling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9031112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90311122022-04-23 Combinatorial Power of cfDNA, CTCs and EVs in Oncology Keup, Corinna Kimmig, Rainer Kasimir-Bauer, Sabine Diagnostics (Basel) Review Liquid biopsy is a promising technique for clinical management of oncological patients. The diversity of analytes circulating in the blood useable for liquid biopsy testing is enormous. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and extracellular vesicles (EVs), as well as blood cells and other soluble components in the plasma, were shown as liquid biopsy analytes. A few studies directly comparing two liquid biopsy analytes showed a benefit of one analyte over the other, while most authors concluded the benefit of the additional analyte. Only three years ago, the first studies to examine the value of a characterization of more than two liquid biopsy analytes from the same sample were conducted. We attempt to reflect on the recent development of multimodal liquid biopsy testing in this review. Although the analytes and clinical purposes of the published multimodal studies differed significantly, the additive value of the analytes was concluded in almost all projects. Thus, the blood components, as liquid biopsy reservoirs, are complementary rather than competitive, and orthogonal data sets were even shown to harbor synergistic effects. The unmistakable potential of multimodal liquid biopsy testing, however, is dampened by its clinical utility, which is yet to be proven, the lack of methodical standardization and insufficiently mature reimbursement, logistics and data handling. MDPI 2022-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9031112/ /pubmed/35453918 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12040870 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Keup, Corinna
Kimmig, Rainer
Kasimir-Bauer, Sabine
Combinatorial Power of cfDNA, CTCs and EVs in Oncology
title Combinatorial Power of cfDNA, CTCs and EVs in Oncology
title_full Combinatorial Power of cfDNA, CTCs and EVs in Oncology
title_fullStr Combinatorial Power of cfDNA, CTCs and EVs in Oncology
title_full_unstemmed Combinatorial Power of cfDNA, CTCs and EVs in Oncology
title_short Combinatorial Power of cfDNA, CTCs and EVs in Oncology
title_sort combinatorial power of cfdna, ctcs and evs in oncology
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9031112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35453918
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12040870
work_keys_str_mv AT keupcorinna combinatorialpowerofcfdnactcsandevsinoncology
AT kimmigrainer combinatorialpowerofcfdnactcsandevsinoncology
AT kasimirbauersabine combinatorialpowerofcfdnactcsandevsinoncology