Cargando…
Combinatorial Power of cfDNA, CTCs and EVs in Oncology
Liquid biopsy is a promising technique for clinical management of oncological patients. The diversity of analytes circulating in the blood useable for liquid biopsy testing is enormous. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and extracellular vesicles (EVs), as well as blood cells and...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9031112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35453918 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12040870 |
_version_ | 1784692308961132544 |
---|---|
author | Keup, Corinna Kimmig, Rainer Kasimir-Bauer, Sabine |
author_facet | Keup, Corinna Kimmig, Rainer Kasimir-Bauer, Sabine |
author_sort | Keup, Corinna |
collection | PubMed |
description | Liquid biopsy is a promising technique for clinical management of oncological patients. The diversity of analytes circulating in the blood useable for liquid biopsy testing is enormous. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and extracellular vesicles (EVs), as well as blood cells and other soluble components in the plasma, were shown as liquid biopsy analytes. A few studies directly comparing two liquid biopsy analytes showed a benefit of one analyte over the other, while most authors concluded the benefit of the additional analyte. Only three years ago, the first studies to examine the value of a characterization of more than two liquid biopsy analytes from the same sample were conducted. We attempt to reflect on the recent development of multimodal liquid biopsy testing in this review. Although the analytes and clinical purposes of the published multimodal studies differed significantly, the additive value of the analytes was concluded in almost all projects. Thus, the blood components, as liquid biopsy reservoirs, are complementary rather than competitive, and orthogonal data sets were even shown to harbor synergistic effects. The unmistakable potential of multimodal liquid biopsy testing, however, is dampened by its clinical utility, which is yet to be proven, the lack of methodical standardization and insufficiently mature reimbursement, logistics and data handling. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9031112 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90311122022-04-23 Combinatorial Power of cfDNA, CTCs and EVs in Oncology Keup, Corinna Kimmig, Rainer Kasimir-Bauer, Sabine Diagnostics (Basel) Review Liquid biopsy is a promising technique for clinical management of oncological patients. The diversity of analytes circulating in the blood useable for liquid biopsy testing is enormous. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and extracellular vesicles (EVs), as well as blood cells and other soluble components in the plasma, were shown as liquid biopsy analytes. A few studies directly comparing two liquid biopsy analytes showed a benefit of one analyte over the other, while most authors concluded the benefit of the additional analyte. Only three years ago, the first studies to examine the value of a characterization of more than two liquid biopsy analytes from the same sample were conducted. We attempt to reflect on the recent development of multimodal liquid biopsy testing in this review. Although the analytes and clinical purposes of the published multimodal studies differed significantly, the additive value of the analytes was concluded in almost all projects. Thus, the blood components, as liquid biopsy reservoirs, are complementary rather than competitive, and orthogonal data sets were even shown to harbor synergistic effects. The unmistakable potential of multimodal liquid biopsy testing, however, is dampened by its clinical utility, which is yet to be proven, the lack of methodical standardization and insufficiently mature reimbursement, logistics and data handling. MDPI 2022-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9031112/ /pubmed/35453918 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12040870 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Keup, Corinna Kimmig, Rainer Kasimir-Bauer, Sabine Combinatorial Power of cfDNA, CTCs and EVs in Oncology |
title | Combinatorial Power of cfDNA, CTCs and EVs in Oncology |
title_full | Combinatorial Power of cfDNA, CTCs and EVs in Oncology |
title_fullStr | Combinatorial Power of cfDNA, CTCs and EVs in Oncology |
title_full_unstemmed | Combinatorial Power of cfDNA, CTCs and EVs in Oncology |
title_short | Combinatorial Power of cfDNA, CTCs and EVs in Oncology |
title_sort | combinatorial power of cfdna, ctcs and evs in oncology |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9031112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35453918 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12040870 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT keupcorinna combinatorialpowerofcfdnactcsandevsinoncology AT kimmigrainer combinatorialpowerofcfdnactcsandevsinoncology AT kasimirbauersabine combinatorialpowerofcfdnactcsandevsinoncology |