Cargando…
The Simpson Grading: Is It Still Valid?
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Since the initial publication of the Simpson Grade scale, the management paradigm for intracranial meningiomas has significantly evolved. The generalized application of the Simpson Grade in modern neurosurgery management of meningiomas is controversial. We conducted a review of the l...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9031418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35454912 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14082007 |
_version_ | 1784692384840286208 |
---|---|
author | Chotai, Silky Schwartz, Theodore H. |
author_facet | Chotai, Silky Schwartz, Theodore H. |
author_sort | Chotai, Silky |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Since the initial publication of the Simpson Grade scale, the management paradigm for intracranial meningiomas has significantly evolved. The generalized application of the Simpson Grade in modern neurosurgery management of meningiomas is controversial. We conducted a review of the literature to determine the prognostic significance of the Simpson Grade and find it to be an antiquated grading scale with limited utility in the modern era. ABSTRACT: The Simpson Grade was introduced in the era of limited resources, outdated techniques, and rudimentary surgical and imaging technologies. With the advent of modern techniques including pre- and post-operative imaging, microsurgical and endoscopic techniques, advanced histopathology and molecular analysis and adjuvant radiotherapy, the utility of the Simpson Grade scale for prognostication of recurrence after meningioma resection has become less useful. While the extent of resection remains an important factor in reducing recurrence, a subjective naked-eye criteria to Grade extent of resection cannot be generalized to all meningiomas regardless of their location or biology. Achieving the highest Simpson Grade resection should not always be the goal of surgery. It is prudent to take advantage of all the tools in the neurosurgeons’ armamentarium to aim for maximal safe resection of meningiomas. The primary goal of this study was to review the literature highlighting the Simpson Grade and its association with recurrence in modern meningioma practice. A PubMed search was conducted using terms “Simpson”, “Grade”, “meningioma”, “recurrence”, “gross total resection”, “extent of resection” “human”. A separate search using the terms “intraoperative imaging”, “intraoperative MRI” and “meningioma” were conducted. All studies reporting prognostic value of Simpson Grades were retrospective in nature. Simpson Grade I, II and III can be defined as gross total resection and were associated with lower recurrence compared to Simpson Grade IV or subtotal resection. The volume of residual tumor, a factor not considered in the Simpson Grade, is also a useful predictor of recurrence. Subtotal resection followed by stereotactic radiosurgery has similar recurrence-free survival as gross total resection. In current modern meningioma surgery, the Simpson Grade is no longer relevant and should be replaced with a grading scale that relies on post-operative MRI imaging that assess GTR versus STR and then divides STR into > or <4–5 cm(3), in combination with modern molecular-based techniques for recurrence risk stratification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9031418 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90314182022-04-23 The Simpson Grading: Is It Still Valid? Chotai, Silky Schwartz, Theodore H. Cancers (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Since the initial publication of the Simpson Grade scale, the management paradigm for intracranial meningiomas has significantly evolved. The generalized application of the Simpson Grade in modern neurosurgery management of meningiomas is controversial. We conducted a review of the literature to determine the prognostic significance of the Simpson Grade and find it to be an antiquated grading scale with limited utility in the modern era. ABSTRACT: The Simpson Grade was introduced in the era of limited resources, outdated techniques, and rudimentary surgical and imaging technologies. With the advent of modern techniques including pre- and post-operative imaging, microsurgical and endoscopic techniques, advanced histopathology and molecular analysis and adjuvant radiotherapy, the utility of the Simpson Grade scale for prognostication of recurrence after meningioma resection has become less useful. While the extent of resection remains an important factor in reducing recurrence, a subjective naked-eye criteria to Grade extent of resection cannot be generalized to all meningiomas regardless of their location or biology. Achieving the highest Simpson Grade resection should not always be the goal of surgery. It is prudent to take advantage of all the tools in the neurosurgeons’ armamentarium to aim for maximal safe resection of meningiomas. The primary goal of this study was to review the literature highlighting the Simpson Grade and its association with recurrence in modern meningioma practice. A PubMed search was conducted using terms “Simpson”, “Grade”, “meningioma”, “recurrence”, “gross total resection”, “extent of resection” “human”. A separate search using the terms “intraoperative imaging”, “intraoperative MRI” and “meningioma” were conducted. All studies reporting prognostic value of Simpson Grades were retrospective in nature. Simpson Grade I, II and III can be defined as gross total resection and were associated with lower recurrence compared to Simpson Grade IV or subtotal resection. The volume of residual tumor, a factor not considered in the Simpson Grade, is also a useful predictor of recurrence. Subtotal resection followed by stereotactic radiosurgery has similar recurrence-free survival as gross total resection. In current modern meningioma surgery, the Simpson Grade is no longer relevant and should be replaced with a grading scale that relies on post-operative MRI imaging that assess GTR versus STR and then divides STR into > or <4–5 cm(3), in combination with modern molecular-based techniques for recurrence risk stratification. MDPI 2022-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9031418/ /pubmed/35454912 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14082007 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Chotai, Silky Schwartz, Theodore H. The Simpson Grading: Is It Still Valid? |
title | The Simpson Grading: Is It Still Valid? |
title_full | The Simpson Grading: Is It Still Valid? |
title_fullStr | The Simpson Grading: Is It Still Valid? |
title_full_unstemmed | The Simpson Grading: Is It Still Valid? |
title_short | The Simpson Grading: Is It Still Valid? |
title_sort | simpson grading: is it still valid? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9031418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35454912 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14082007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chotaisilky thesimpsongradingisitstillvalid AT schwartztheodoreh thesimpsongradingisitstillvalid AT chotaisilky simpsongradingisitstillvalid AT schwartztheodoreh simpsongradingisitstillvalid |