Cargando…

Ethnic-Guided Soft Tissue Cephalometric Analysis on Lambani Indian Inhabitants for Forensic Facial Reconstruction

Background: Forensic craniofacial reconstruction is a combination of both scientific technique and artistic skill that assist facial soft tissue approximation on the skull to obtain an image of an individual that varies in the different ethnic groups depending on genetic and environmental factors su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nitya, K, Madhushankari, G S, Narayan, Keerthi V, Basandi, Praveen S, Ramya, R, Vasumathi, D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9031482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35475086
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23430
Descripción
Sumario:Background: Forensic craniofacial reconstruction is a combination of both scientific technique and artistic skill that assist facial soft tissue approximation on the skull to obtain an image of an individual that varies in the different ethnic groups depending on genetic and environmental factors such as soft tissue norms. Objectives: The present study was aimed to evaluate the soft tissue norms for Lambani Indian tribes spread across the state of Karnataka in India and compare them with the local inherent ethnolinguistic Kannadiga population. Material and methods: Forty healthy individuals encompassing 20 Lambanis and 20 Kannadigas were selected using demographic information. Lateral cephalograms obtained were analyzed for various soft tissue landmarks that include facial angle, upper lip curvature, skeletal convexity, H angle, nose tip to H-line, upper sulcus depth, lower sulcus depth, upper lip thickness, upper lip strain, lower lip to H line, soft tissue chin thickness, and glabella. Results: It was observed that glabella thickness, upper sulcus depth, and lower lip to H line showed a significant difference between Lambani and Kannadiga populations. Lambani’s have a higher facial angle than the Kannadiga group though not statistically significant. Gender-wise comparison had shown a significant difference in variables on upper sulcus depth, glabella among females, and lower lip to H line, glabella among males. Conclusion: The differences obtained between the two ethnic groups in this study clearly suggest the need for separate soft tissue thickness norms for distinctive populations that could be vital in the facial reconstruction of an individual in the field of forensic investigation to narrow down the identification process.