Cargando…

Implications of the Harmonization of [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT Imaging for Response Assessment of Treatment in Radiotherapy Planning

The purpose of this work is to present useful recommendations for the use of [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT imaging in radiotherapy planning and monitoring under different versions of EARL accreditation for harmonization of PET devices. A proof-of-concept experiment designed on an anthropomorphic phantom was car...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiménez-Ortega, Elisa, Agüera, Raquel, Ureba, Ana, Balcerzyk, Marcin, Wals-Zurita, Amadeo, García-Gómez, Francisco Javier, Leal, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9031488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35448724
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8020090
_version_ 1784692401993940992
author Jiménez-Ortega, Elisa
Agüera, Raquel
Ureba, Ana
Balcerzyk, Marcin
Wals-Zurita, Amadeo
García-Gómez, Francisco Javier
Leal, Antonio
author_facet Jiménez-Ortega, Elisa
Agüera, Raquel
Ureba, Ana
Balcerzyk, Marcin
Wals-Zurita, Amadeo
García-Gómez, Francisco Javier
Leal, Antonio
author_sort Jiménez-Ortega, Elisa
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this work is to present useful recommendations for the use of [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT imaging in radiotherapy planning and monitoring under different versions of EARL accreditation for harmonization of PET devices. A proof-of-concept experiment designed on an anthropomorphic phantom was carried out to establish the most suitable interpolation methods of the PET images in the different steps of the planning procedure. Based on PET/CT images obtained by using these optimal interpolations for the old EARL accreditation (EARL1) and for the new one (EARL2), the treatment plannings of representative actual clinical cases were calculated, and the clinical implications of the resulting differences were analyzed. As expected, EARL2 provided smaller volumes with higher resolution than EARL1. The increase in the size of the reconstructed volumes with EARL1 accreditation caused high doses in the organs at risk and in the regions adjacent to the target volumes. EARL2 accreditation allowed an improvement in the accuracy of the PET imaging precision, allowing more personalized radiotherapy. This work provides recommendations for those centers that intend to benefit from the new accreditation, EARL2, and can help build confidence of those that must continue working under the EARL1 accreditation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9031488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90314882022-04-23 Implications of the Harmonization of [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT Imaging for Response Assessment of Treatment in Radiotherapy Planning Jiménez-Ortega, Elisa Agüera, Raquel Ureba, Ana Balcerzyk, Marcin Wals-Zurita, Amadeo García-Gómez, Francisco Javier Leal, Antonio Tomography Article The purpose of this work is to present useful recommendations for the use of [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT imaging in radiotherapy planning and monitoring under different versions of EARL accreditation for harmonization of PET devices. A proof-of-concept experiment designed on an anthropomorphic phantom was carried out to establish the most suitable interpolation methods of the PET images in the different steps of the planning procedure. Based on PET/CT images obtained by using these optimal interpolations for the old EARL accreditation (EARL1) and for the new one (EARL2), the treatment plannings of representative actual clinical cases were calculated, and the clinical implications of the resulting differences were analyzed. As expected, EARL2 provided smaller volumes with higher resolution than EARL1. The increase in the size of the reconstructed volumes with EARL1 accreditation caused high doses in the organs at risk and in the regions adjacent to the target volumes. EARL2 accreditation allowed an improvement in the accuracy of the PET imaging precision, allowing more personalized radiotherapy. This work provides recommendations for those centers that intend to benefit from the new accreditation, EARL2, and can help build confidence of those that must continue working under the EARL1 accreditation. MDPI 2022-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9031488/ /pubmed/35448724 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8020090 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jiménez-Ortega, Elisa
Agüera, Raquel
Ureba, Ana
Balcerzyk, Marcin
Wals-Zurita, Amadeo
García-Gómez, Francisco Javier
Leal, Antonio
Implications of the Harmonization of [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT Imaging for Response Assessment of Treatment in Radiotherapy Planning
title Implications of the Harmonization of [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT Imaging for Response Assessment of Treatment in Radiotherapy Planning
title_full Implications of the Harmonization of [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT Imaging for Response Assessment of Treatment in Radiotherapy Planning
title_fullStr Implications of the Harmonization of [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT Imaging for Response Assessment of Treatment in Radiotherapy Planning
title_full_unstemmed Implications of the Harmonization of [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT Imaging for Response Assessment of Treatment in Radiotherapy Planning
title_short Implications of the Harmonization of [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT Imaging for Response Assessment of Treatment in Radiotherapy Planning
title_sort implications of the harmonization of [(18)f]fdg-pet/ct imaging for response assessment of treatment in radiotherapy planning
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9031488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35448724
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8020090
work_keys_str_mv AT jimenezortegaelisa implicationsoftheharmonizationof18ffdgpetctimagingforresponseassessmentoftreatmentinradiotherapyplanning
AT agueraraquel implicationsoftheharmonizationof18ffdgpetctimagingforresponseassessmentoftreatmentinradiotherapyplanning
AT urebaana implicationsoftheharmonizationof18ffdgpetctimagingforresponseassessmentoftreatmentinradiotherapyplanning
AT balcerzykmarcin implicationsoftheharmonizationof18ffdgpetctimagingforresponseassessmentoftreatmentinradiotherapyplanning
AT walszuritaamadeo implicationsoftheharmonizationof18ffdgpetctimagingforresponseassessmentoftreatmentinradiotherapyplanning
AT garciagomezfranciscojavier implicationsoftheharmonizationof18ffdgpetctimagingforresponseassessmentoftreatmentinradiotherapyplanning
AT lealantonio implicationsoftheharmonizationof18ffdgpetctimagingforresponseassessmentoftreatmentinradiotherapyplanning