Cargando…
Analytical Sensitivity of Six SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Tests for Omicron versus Delta Variant
Rapid antigen detection (RAD) tests are commonly used for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infections. However, with the continuous emergence of new variants of concern (VOC), presenting various mutations potentially affecting the nucleocapsid protein, the analytical performances of these assays should b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9031584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35458384 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v14040654 |
_version_ | 1784692426399547392 |
---|---|
author | Bayart, Jean-Louis Degosserie, Jonathan Favresse, Julien Gillot, Constant Didembourg, Marie Djokoto, Happy Phanio Verbelen, Valérie Roussel, Gatien Maschietto, Céline Mullier, François Dogné, Jean-Michel Douxfils, Jonathan |
author_facet | Bayart, Jean-Louis Degosserie, Jonathan Favresse, Julien Gillot, Constant Didembourg, Marie Djokoto, Happy Phanio Verbelen, Valérie Roussel, Gatien Maschietto, Céline Mullier, François Dogné, Jean-Michel Douxfils, Jonathan |
author_sort | Bayart, Jean-Louis |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rapid antigen detection (RAD) tests are commonly used for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infections. However, with the continuous emergence of new variants of concern (VOC), presenting various mutations potentially affecting the nucleocapsid protein, the analytical performances of these assays should be frequently reevaluated. One hundred and twenty samples were selected and tested with both RT-qPCR and six commercial RAD tests that are commonly sold in Belgian pharmacies. Of these, direct whole-genome sequencing identified the strains present in 116 samples, of which 70 were Delta and 46 were Omicron (BA.1 and BA.1.1 sub-lineages, respectively). The sensitivity across a wide range of Ct values (13.5 to 35.7; median = 21.3) ranged from 70.0% to 92.9% for Delta strains and from 69.6% to 78.3% for Omicron strains. When taking swabs with a low viral load (Ct > 25, corresponding to <4.9 log(10) copies/mL), only the Roche RAD test showed acceptable performances for the Delta strains (80.0%), while poor performances were observed for the other RAD tests (20.0% to 40.0%). All the tested devices had poor performances for the Omicron samples with a low viral load (0.0% to 23.1%). The poor performances observed with low viral loads, particularly for the Omicron strain, is an important limitation of RAD tests, which is not sufficiently highlighted in the instructions for use of these devices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9031584 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90315842022-04-23 Analytical Sensitivity of Six SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Tests for Omicron versus Delta Variant Bayart, Jean-Louis Degosserie, Jonathan Favresse, Julien Gillot, Constant Didembourg, Marie Djokoto, Happy Phanio Verbelen, Valérie Roussel, Gatien Maschietto, Céline Mullier, François Dogné, Jean-Michel Douxfils, Jonathan Viruses Communication Rapid antigen detection (RAD) tests are commonly used for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infections. However, with the continuous emergence of new variants of concern (VOC), presenting various mutations potentially affecting the nucleocapsid protein, the analytical performances of these assays should be frequently reevaluated. One hundred and twenty samples were selected and tested with both RT-qPCR and six commercial RAD tests that are commonly sold in Belgian pharmacies. Of these, direct whole-genome sequencing identified the strains present in 116 samples, of which 70 were Delta and 46 were Omicron (BA.1 and BA.1.1 sub-lineages, respectively). The sensitivity across a wide range of Ct values (13.5 to 35.7; median = 21.3) ranged from 70.0% to 92.9% for Delta strains and from 69.6% to 78.3% for Omicron strains. When taking swabs with a low viral load (Ct > 25, corresponding to <4.9 log(10) copies/mL), only the Roche RAD test showed acceptable performances for the Delta strains (80.0%), while poor performances were observed for the other RAD tests (20.0% to 40.0%). All the tested devices had poor performances for the Omicron samples with a low viral load (0.0% to 23.1%). The poor performances observed with low viral loads, particularly for the Omicron strain, is an important limitation of RAD tests, which is not sufficiently highlighted in the instructions for use of these devices. MDPI 2022-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9031584/ /pubmed/35458384 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v14040654 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Communication Bayart, Jean-Louis Degosserie, Jonathan Favresse, Julien Gillot, Constant Didembourg, Marie Djokoto, Happy Phanio Verbelen, Valérie Roussel, Gatien Maschietto, Céline Mullier, François Dogné, Jean-Michel Douxfils, Jonathan Analytical Sensitivity of Six SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Tests for Omicron versus Delta Variant |
title | Analytical Sensitivity of Six SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Tests for Omicron versus Delta Variant |
title_full | Analytical Sensitivity of Six SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Tests for Omicron versus Delta Variant |
title_fullStr | Analytical Sensitivity of Six SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Tests for Omicron versus Delta Variant |
title_full_unstemmed | Analytical Sensitivity of Six SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Tests for Omicron versus Delta Variant |
title_short | Analytical Sensitivity of Six SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Tests for Omicron versus Delta Variant |
title_sort | analytical sensitivity of six sars-cov-2 rapid antigen tests for omicron versus delta variant |
topic | Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9031584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35458384 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v14040654 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bayartjeanlouis analyticalsensitivityofsixsarscov2rapidantigentestsforomicronversusdeltavariant AT degosseriejonathan analyticalsensitivityofsixsarscov2rapidantigentestsforomicronversusdeltavariant AT favressejulien analyticalsensitivityofsixsarscov2rapidantigentestsforomicronversusdeltavariant AT gillotconstant analyticalsensitivityofsixsarscov2rapidantigentestsforomicronversusdeltavariant AT didembourgmarie analyticalsensitivityofsixsarscov2rapidantigentestsforomicronversusdeltavariant AT djokotohappyphanio analyticalsensitivityofsixsarscov2rapidantigentestsforomicronversusdeltavariant AT verbelenvalerie analyticalsensitivityofsixsarscov2rapidantigentestsforomicronversusdeltavariant AT rousselgatien analyticalsensitivityofsixsarscov2rapidantigentestsforomicronversusdeltavariant AT maschiettoceline analyticalsensitivityofsixsarscov2rapidantigentestsforomicronversusdeltavariant AT mullierfrancois analyticalsensitivityofsixsarscov2rapidantigentestsforomicronversusdeltavariant AT dognejeanmichel analyticalsensitivityofsixsarscov2rapidantigentestsforomicronversusdeltavariant AT douxfilsjonathan analyticalsensitivityofsixsarscov2rapidantigentestsforomicronversusdeltavariant |