Cargando…

Prescribing practices, patterns, and potential harms in patients receiving palliative care: A systematic scoping review

BACKGROUND: Patients receiving palliative care often have existing comorbidities necessitating the prescribing of multiple medications. To maximize quality of life in this patient cohort, it is important to tailor prescribing of medication for preventing and treating existing illnesses and those for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cadogan, Cathal A., Murphy, Melanie, Boland, Miriam, Bennett, Kathleen, McLean, Sarah, Hughes, Carmel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9031741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35480601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2021.100050
_version_ 1784692466304155648
author Cadogan, Cathal A.
Murphy, Melanie
Boland, Miriam
Bennett, Kathleen
McLean, Sarah
Hughes, Carmel
author_facet Cadogan, Cathal A.
Murphy, Melanie
Boland, Miriam
Bennett, Kathleen
McLean, Sarah
Hughes, Carmel
author_sort Cadogan, Cathal A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients receiving palliative care often have existing comorbidities necessitating the prescribing of multiple medications. To maximize quality of life in this patient cohort, it is important to tailor prescribing of medication for preventing and treating existing illnesses and those for controlling symptoms, such as pain, according to individual specific needs. OBJECTIVE(S): To provide an overview of peer-reviewed observational research on prescribing practices, patterns, and potential harms in patients receiving palliative care. METHODS: A systematic scoping review was conducted using four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science). Each database was searched from inception to May 2020. Search terms included ‘palliative care,’ ‘end of life,’ and ‘prescribing.’ Eligible studies had to examine prescribing for adults (≥18 years) receiving palliative care in any setting as a study aim or outcome. Studies focusing on single medication types (e.g., opioids), medication classes (e.g., chemotherapy), or clinical indications (e.g., pain) were excluded. The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for scoping reviews, and the findings were described using narrative synthesis. RESULTS: Following deduplication, 16,565 unique citations were reviewed, and 56 studies met inclusion criteria. The average number of prescribed medications per patient ranged from 3 to 23. Typically, prescribing changes involved decreases in preventative medications and increases in symptom-specific medications closer to the time of death. Twenty-one studies assessed the appropriateness of prescribing using various tools. The prevalence of patients with ≥1 potentially inappropriate prescription ranged from 15 to 92%. Three studies reported on adverse drug events. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review provides a broad overview of existing research and shows that many patients receiving palliative care receive multiple medications closer to the time of death. Future research should focus in greater detail on prescribing appropriateness using tools specifically developed to guide prescribing in palliative care and the potential for harm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9031741
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90317412022-04-26 Prescribing practices, patterns, and potential harms in patients receiving palliative care: A systematic scoping review Cadogan, Cathal A. Murphy, Melanie Boland, Miriam Bennett, Kathleen McLean, Sarah Hughes, Carmel Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm Article BACKGROUND: Patients receiving palliative care often have existing comorbidities necessitating the prescribing of multiple medications. To maximize quality of life in this patient cohort, it is important to tailor prescribing of medication for preventing and treating existing illnesses and those for controlling symptoms, such as pain, according to individual specific needs. OBJECTIVE(S): To provide an overview of peer-reviewed observational research on prescribing practices, patterns, and potential harms in patients receiving palliative care. METHODS: A systematic scoping review was conducted using four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science). Each database was searched from inception to May 2020. Search terms included ‘palliative care,’ ‘end of life,’ and ‘prescribing.’ Eligible studies had to examine prescribing for adults (≥18 years) receiving palliative care in any setting as a study aim or outcome. Studies focusing on single medication types (e.g., opioids), medication classes (e.g., chemotherapy), or clinical indications (e.g., pain) were excluded. The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for scoping reviews, and the findings were described using narrative synthesis. RESULTS: Following deduplication, 16,565 unique citations were reviewed, and 56 studies met inclusion criteria. The average number of prescribed medications per patient ranged from 3 to 23. Typically, prescribing changes involved decreases in preventative medications and increases in symptom-specific medications closer to the time of death. Twenty-one studies assessed the appropriateness of prescribing using various tools. The prevalence of patients with ≥1 potentially inappropriate prescription ranged from 15 to 92%. Three studies reported on adverse drug events. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review provides a broad overview of existing research and shows that many patients receiving palliative care receive multiple medications closer to the time of death. Future research should focus in greater detail on prescribing appropriateness using tools specifically developed to guide prescribing in palliative care and the potential for harm. Elsevier 2021-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9031741/ /pubmed/35480601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2021.100050 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cadogan, Cathal A.
Murphy, Melanie
Boland, Miriam
Bennett, Kathleen
McLean, Sarah
Hughes, Carmel
Prescribing practices, patterns, and potential harms in patients receiving palliative care: A systematic scoping review
title Prescribing practices, patterns, and potential harms in patients receiving palliative care: A systematic scoping review
title_full Prescribing practices, patterns, and potential harms in patients receiving palliative care: A systematic scoping review
title_fullStr Prescribing practices, patterns, and potential harms in patients receiving palliative care: A systematic scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Prescribing practices, patterns, and potential harms in patients receiving palliative care: A systematic scoping review
title_short Prescribing practices, patterns, and potential harms in patients receiving palliative care: A systematic scoping review
title_sort prescribing practices, patterns, and potential harms in patients receiving palliative care: a systematic scoping review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9031741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35480601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2021.100050
work_keys_str_mv AT cadogancathala prescribingpracticespatternsandpotentialharmsinpatientsreceivingpalliativecareasystematicscopingreview
AT murphymelanie prescribingpracticespatternsandpotentialharmsinpatientsreceivingpalliativecareasystematicscopingreview
AT bolandmiriam prescribingpracticespatternsandpotentialharmsinpatientsreceivingpalliativecareasystematicscopingreview
AT bennettkathleen prescribingpracticespatternsandpotentialharmsinpatientsreceivingpalliativecareasystematicscopingreview
AT mcleansarah prescribingpracticespatternsandpotentialharmsinpatientsreceivingpalliativecareasystematicscopingreview
AT hughescarmel prescribingpracticespatternsandpotentialharmsinpatientsreceivingpalliativecareasystematicscopingreview