Cargando…

Evaluation of pharmacy value-added services in public health facilities: Staff perception and cost analysis

BACKGROUND: Pharmacy Value Added Services (VAS) were introduced in Malaysian public health facilities to facilitate the process of medicine collection. Examples include Drive-through pharmacy, Medicine by Post, SMS Take&Go, Appointment Card and medicine locker, commonly referred to as Medibox. O...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yussof, Izzati, Ibrahim, Nor Haizan, Che Ayub, Asilah, Ab Hashim, Norsyazana, Choon, Ching Ju, Chee, Chew Yee, Abdul Rani, Asma Amalina, Hashim, Helmi Hafiz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9032075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35478509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2022.100120
_version_ 1784692551176945664
author Yussof, Izzati
Ibrahim, Nor Haizan
Che Ayub, Asilah
Ab Hashim, Norsyazana
Choon, Ching Ju
Chee, Chew Yee
Abdul Rani, Asma Amalina
Hashim, Helmi Hafiz
author_facet Yussof, Izzati
Ibrahim, Nor Haizan
Che Ayub, Asilah
Ab Hashim, Norsyazana
Choon, Ching Ju
Chee, Chew Yee
Abdul Rani, Asma Amalina
Hashim, Helmi Hafiz
author_sort Yussof, Izzati
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pharmacy Value Added Services (VAS) were introduced in Malaysian public health facilities to facilitate the process of medicine collection. Examples include Drive-through pharmacy, Medicine by Post, SMS Take&Go, Appointment Card and medicine locker, commonly referred to as Medibox. OBJECTIVES: To assess the perception of VAS among pharmacy staff, and to compare the time and cost needed to prepare medications for VAS and conventional counter service. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 17 public health facilities across Kuala Lumpur and Putrajaya from May until September 2020. There were two parts of this study: 1) a survey on the perception of VAS among pharmacy staff, which assessed respondents' experience of handling VAS and their perception towards the services; and 2) a cost analysis to compare the direct cost of preparing refill medications for VAS and conventional counter service, estimated from average salary and direct non-medical cost. RESULTS: 290 respondents answered the survey. Most respondents had a positive opinion about VAS. Lack of storage and insufficient manpower were the top two barriers in VAS utilisation and implementation as perceived by pharmacy staff. The average time (in minutes) needed to prepare one prescription was highest for Medicine by Post service (10.31), followed by Medibox (10.25), Appointment Systems (6.24) and conventional counter service (3.99). Medibox had the highest average cost per prescription (RM5.49), followed by Medicine by Post (RM5.05), Appointment Systems (RM2.89) and conventional counter service (RM1.75). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the respondents involved in this study acknowledged the benefits of VAS to patients, but there were aspects of the services that could be improved. Preparation of patient medication for VAS requires significantly more time and cost than conventional counter service, indicating the need to review and streamline implementation of the services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9032075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90320752022-04-26 Evaluation of pharmacy value-added services in public health facilities: Staff perception and cost analysis Yussof, Izzati Ibrahim, Nor Haizan Che Ayub, Asilah Ab Hashim, Norsyazana Choon, Ching Ju Chee, Chew Yee Abdul Rani, Asma Amalina Hashim, Helmi Hafiz Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm Article BACKGROUND: Pharmacy Value Added Services (VAS) were introduced in Malaysian public health facilities to facilitate the process of medicine collection. Examples include Drive-through pharmacy, Medicine by Post, SMS Take&Go, Appointment Card and medicine locker, commonly referred to as Medibox. OBJECTIVES: To assess the perception of VAS among pharmacy staff, and to compare the time and cost needed to prepare medications for VAS and conventional counter service. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 17 public health facilities across Kuala Lumpur and Putrajaya from May until September 2020. There were two parts of this study: 1) a survey on the perception of VAS among pharmacy staff, which assessed respondents' experience of handling VAS and their perception towards the services; and 2) a cost analysis to compare the direct cost of preparing refill medications for VAS and conventional counter service, estimated from average salary and direct non-medical cost. RESULTS: 290 respondents answered the survey. Most respondents had a positive opinion about VAS. Lack of storage and insufficient manpower were the top two barriers in VAS utilisation and implementation as perceived by pharmacy staff. The average time (in minutes) needed to prepare one prescription was highest for Medicine by Post service (10.31), followed by Medibox (10.25), Appointment Systems (6.24) and conventional counter service (3.99). Medibox had the highest average cost per prescription (RM5.49), followed by Medicine by Post (RM5.05), Appointment Systems (RM2.89) and conventional counter service (RM1.75). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the respondents involved in this study acknowledged the benefits of VAS to patients, but there were aspects of the services that could be improved. Preparation of patient medication for VAS requires significantly more time and cost than conventional counter service, indicating the need to review and streamline implementation of the services. Elsevier 2022-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9032075/ /pubmed/35478509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2022.100120 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yussof, Izzati
Ibrahim, Nor Haizan
Che Ayub, Asilah
Ab Hashim, Norsyazana
Choon, Ching Ju
Chee, Chew Yee
Abdul Rani, Asma Amalina
Hashim, Helmi Hafiz
Evaluation of pharmacy value-added services in public health facilities: Staff perception and cost analysis
title Evaluation of pharmacy value-added services in public health facilities: Staff perception and cost analysis
title_full Evaluation of pharmacy value-added services in public health facilities: Staff perception and cost analysis
title_fullStr Evaluation of pharmacy value-added services in public health facilities: Staff perception and cost analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of pharmacy value-added services in public health facilities: Staff perception and cost analysis
title_short Evaluation of pharmacy value-added services in public health facilities: Staff perception and cost analysis
title_sort evaluation of pharmacy value-added services in public health facilities: staff perception and cost analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9032075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35478509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2022.100120
work_keys_str_mv AT yussofizzati evaluationofpharmacyvalueaddedservicesinpublichealthfacilitiesstaffperceptionandcostanalysis
AT ibrahimnorhaizan evaluationofpharmacyvalueaddedservicesinpublichealthfacilitiesstaffperceptionandcostanalysis
AT cheayubasilah evaluationofpharmacyvalueaddedservicesinpublichealthfacilitiesstaffperceptionandcostanalysis
AT abhashimnorsyazana evaluationofpharmacyvalueaddedservicesinpublichealthfacilitiesstaffperceptionandcostanalysis
AT choonchingju evaluationofpharmacyvalueaddedservicesinpublichealthfacilitiesstaffperceptionandcostanalysis
AT cheechewyee evaluationofpharmacyvalueaddedservicesinpublichealthfacilitiesstaffperceptionandcostanalysis
AT abdulraniasmaamalina evaluationofpharmacyvalueaddedservicesinpublichealthfacilitiesstaffperceptionandcostanalysis
AT hashimhelmihafiz evaluationofpharmacyvalueaddedservicesinpublichealthfacilitiesstaffperceptionandcostanalysis