Cargando…

Bacterial Membranes Are More Perturbed by the Asymmetric Versus Symmetric Loading of Amphiphilic Molecules

Characterizing the biophysical properties of bacterial membranes is critical for understanding the protective nature of the microbial envelope, interaction of biological membranes with exogenous materials, and designing new antibacterial agents. Presented here are molecular dynamics simulations for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drew Bennett, W. F., Fox, Stephen J., Sun, Delin, Maupin, C. Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9032087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35448320
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12040350
_version_ 1784692554089889792
author Drew Bennett, W. F.
Fox, Stephen J.
Sun, Delin
Maupin, C. Mark
author_facet Drew Bennett, W. F.
Fox, Stephen J.
Sun, Delin
Maupin, C. Mark
author_sort Drew Bennett, W. F.
collection PubMed
description Characterizing the biophysical properties of bacterial membranes is critical for understanding the protective nature of the microbial envelope, interaction of biological membranes with exogenous materials, and designing new antibacterial agents. Presented here are molecular dynamics simulations for two cationic quaternary ammonium compounds, and the anionic and nonionic form of a fatty acid molecule interacting with a Staphylococcus aureus bacterial inner membrane. The effect of the tested materials on the properties of the model membranes are evaluated with respect to various structural properties such as the lateral pressure profile, lipid tail order parameter, and the bilayer’s electrostatic potential. Conducting asymmetric loading of molecules in only one leaflet, it was observed that anionic and cationic amphiphiles have a large impact on the Staphylococcus aureus membrane’s electrostatic potential and lateral pressure profile as compared to a symmetric distribution. Nonintuitively, we find that the cationic and anionic molecules induce a similar change in the electrostatic potential, which points to the complexity of membrane interfaces, and how asymmetry can induce biophysical consequences. Finally, we link changes in membrane structure to the rate of electroporation for the membranes, and again find a crucial impact of introducing asymmetry to the system. Understanding these physical mechanisms provides critical insights and viable pathways for the rational design of membrane-active molecules, where controlling the localization is key.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9032087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90320872022-04-23 Bacterial Membranes Are More Perturbed by the Asymmetric Versus Symmetric Loading of Amphiphilic Molecules Drew Bennett, W. F. Fox, Stephen J. Sun, Delin Maupin, C. Mark Membranes (Basel) Article Characterizing the biophysical properties of bacterial membranes is critical for understanding the protective nature of the microbial envelope, interaction of biological membranes with exogenous materials, and designing new antibacterial agents. Presented here are molecular dynamics simulations for two cationic quaternary ammonium compounds, and the anionic and nonionic form of a fatty acid molecule interacting with a Staphylococcus aureus bacterial inner membrane. The effect of the tested materials on the properties of the model membranes are evaluated with respect to various structural properties such as the lateral pressure profile, lipid tail order parameter, and the bilayer’s electrostatic potential. Conducting asymmetric loading of molecules in only one leaflet, it was observed that anionic and cationic amphiphiles have a large impact on the Staphylococcus aureus membrane’s electrostatic potential and lateral pressure profile as compared to a symmetric distribution. Nonintuitively, we find that the cationic and anionic molecules induce a similar change in the electrostatic potential, which points to the complexity of membrane interfaces, and how asymmetry can induce biophysical consequences. Finally, we link changes in membrane structure to the rate of electroporation for the membranes, and again find a crucial impact of introducing asymmetry to the system. Understanding these physical mechanisms provides critical insights and viable pathways for the rational design of membrane-active molecules, where controlling the localization is key. MDPI 2022-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9032087/ /pubmed/35448320 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12040350 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Drew Bennett, W. F.
Fox, Stephen J.
Sun, Delin
Maupin, C. Mark
Bacterial Membranes Are More Perturbed by the Asymmetric Versus Symmetric Loading of Amphiphilic Molecules
title Bacterial Membranes Are More Perturbed by the Asymmetric Versus Symmetric Loading of Amphiphilic Molecules
title_full Bacterial Membranes Are More Perturbed by the Asymmetric Versus Symmetric Loading of Amphiphilic Molecules
title_fullStr Bacterial Membranes Are More Perturbed by the Asymmetric Versus Symmetric Loading of Amphiphilic Molecules
title_full_unstemmed Bacterial Membranes Are More Perturbed by the Asymmetric Versus Symmetric Loading of Amphiphilic Molecules
title_short Bacterial Membranes Are More Perturbed by the Asymmetric Versus Symmetric Loading of Amphiphilic Molecules
title_sort bacterial membranes are more perturbed by the asymmetric versus symmetric loading of amphiphilic molecules
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9032087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35448320
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12040350
work_keys_str_mv AT drewbennettwf bacterialmembranesaremoreperturbedbytheasymmetricversussymmetricloadingofamphiphilicmolecules
AT foxstephenj bacterialmembranesaremoreperturbedbytheasymmetricversussymmetricloadingofamphiphilicmolecules
AT sundelin bacterialmembranesaremoreperturbedbytheasymmetricversussymmetricloadingofamphiphilicmolecules
AT maupincmark bacterialmembranesaremoreperturbedbytheasymmetricversussymmetricloadingofamphiphilicmolecules