Cargando…
The effectiveness of incentives for research participation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
BACKGROUND: Recruitment plays a vital role in conducting randomized control trials (RCTs). Challenges and failure of proper recruitment lead to early termination of trials. Monetary incentives have been suggested as a potential solution to these challenges. Therefore, we aimed to do a systematic rev...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9032371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35452488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267534 |
_version_ | 1784692626975358976 |
---|---|
author | Abdelazeem, Basel Abbas, Kirellos Said Amin, Mostafa Atef El-Shahat, Nahla Ahmed Malik, Bilal Kalantary, Atefeh Eltobgy, Mostafa |
author_facet | Abdelazeem, Basel Abbas, Kirellos Said Amin, Mostafa Atef El-Shahat, Nahla Ahmed Malik, Bilal Kalantary, Atefeh Eltobgy, Mostafa |
author_sort | Abdelazeem, Basel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recruitment plays a vital role in conducting randomized control trials (RCTs). Challenges and failure of proper recruitment lead to early termination of trials. Monetary incentives have been suggested as a potential solution to these challenges. Therefore, we aimed to do a systematic review and analysis to evaluate the effect of incentives on the number of participants willing to consent to and participate in RCTs. METHODS: Electronic databases were systematically searched from inception to September 23(rd), 2021, using the following keywords: payments, incentive, response, participation, enrollment, randomized, randomization, and RCT. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess the quality of the included trials. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated with their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). All analyses were done with the random-effects model. We used Revman software to perform the analysis. RESULTS: Six RCTs with 6,253 Participants met the inclusion criteria. Our analysis showed significant improvement in response rate (RR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.55; P = 0.02) and consent rates (RR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.85; P = 0.006) when an incentive payment was offered to participants. Even a small amount of incentive showed significant improvement in both consent (RR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.73; P = 0.03) and response rates (RR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.08, 1.47; P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our meta-analysis demonstrated statistically significant increases in the rate of consent and responses from participants when offered even small monetary value incentives. These findings suggest that incentives may be used to reduce the rate of recruitment failure and subsequent study termination. However, further RCTs are needed to establish a critical threshold beyond which incentive amount does not alter response rates further and the types of RCTs in which financial incentives are likely to be effective. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9032371 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90323712022-04-23 The effectiveness of incentives for research participation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Abdelazeem, Basel Abbas, Kirellos Said Amin, Mostafa Atef El-Shahat, Nahla Ahmed Malik, Bilal Kalantary, Atefeh Eltobgy, Mostafa PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Recruitment plays a vital role in conducting randomized control trials (RCTs). Challenges and failure of proper recruitment lead to early termination of trials. Monetary incentives have been suggested as a potential solution to these challenges. Therefore, we aimed to do a systematic review and analysis to evaluate the effect of incentives on the number of participants willing to consent to and participate in RCTs. METHODS: Electronic databases were systematically searched from inception to September 23(rd), 2021, using the following keywords: payments, incentive, response, participation, enrollment, randomized, randomization, and RCT. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess the quality of the included trials. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated with their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). All analyses were done with the random-effects model. We used Revman software to perform the analysis. RESULTS: Six RCTs with 6,253 Participants met the inclusion criteria. Our analysis showed significant improvement in response rate (RR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.55; P = 0.02) and consent rates (RR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.85; P = 0.006) when an incentive payment was offered to participants. Even a small amount of incentive showed significant improvement in both consent (RR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.73; P = 0.03) and response rates (RR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.08, 1.47; P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our meta-analysis demonstrated statistically significant increases in the rate of consent and responses from participants when offered even small monetary value incentives. These findings suggest that incentives may be used to reduce the rate of recruitment failure and subsequent study termination. However, further RCTs are needed to establish a critical threshold beyond which incentive amount does not alter response rates further and the types of RCTs in which financial incentives are likely to be effective. Public Library of Science 2022-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9032371/ /pubmed/35452488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267534 Text en © 2022 Abdelazeem et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Abdelazeem, Basel Abbas, Kirellos Said Amin, Mostafa Atef El-Shahat, Nahla Ahmed Malik, Bilal Kalantary, Atefeh Eltobgy, Mostafa The effectiveness of incentives for research participation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title | The effectiveness of incentives for research participation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full | The effectiveness of incentives for research participation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | The effectiveness of incentives for research participation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | The effectiveness of incentives for research participation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_short | The effectiveness of incentives for research participation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | effectiveness of incentives for research participation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9032371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35452488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267534 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abdelazeembasel theeffectivenessofincentivesforresearchparticipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT abbaskirellossaid theeffectivenessofincentivesforresearchparticipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT aminmostafaatef theeffectivenessofincentivesforresearchparticipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT elshahatnahlaahmed theeffectivenessofincentivesforresearchparticipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT malikbilal theeffectivenessofincentivesforresearchparticipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT kalantaryatefeh theeffectivenessofincentivesforresearchparticipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT eltobgymostafa theeffectivenessofincentivesforresearchparticipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT abdelazeembasel effectivenessofincentivesforresearchparticipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT abbaskirellossaid effectivenessofincentivesforresearchparticipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT aminmostafaatef effectivenessofincentivesforresearchparticipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT elshahatnahlaahmed effectivenessofincentivesforresearchparticipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT malikbilal effectivenessofincentivesforresearchparticipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT kalantaryatefeh effectivenessofincentivesforresearchparticipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT eltobgymostafa effectivenessofincentivesforresearchparticipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |