Cargando…

The effectiveness of incentives for research participation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Recruitment plays a vital role in conducting randomized control trials (RCTs). Challenges and failure of proper recruitment lead to early termination of trials. Monetary incentives have been suggested as a potential solution to these challenges. Therefore, we aimed to do a systematic rev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdelazeem, Basel, Abbas, Kirellos Said, Amin, Mostafa Atef, El-Shahat, Nahla Ahmed, Malik, Bilal, Kalantary, Atefeh, Eltobgy, Mostafa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9032371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35452488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267534
_version_ 1784692626975358976
author Abdelazeem, Basel
Abbas, Kirellos Said
Amin, Mostafa Atef
El-Shahat, Nahla Ahmed
Malik, Bilal
Kalantary, Atefeh
Eltobgy, Mostafa
author_facet Abdelazeem, Basel
Abbas, Kirellos Said
Amin, Mostafa Atef
El-Shahat, Nahla Ahmed
Malik, Bilal
Kalantary, Atefeh
Eltobgy, Mostafa
author_sort Abdelazeem, Basel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recruitment plays a vital role in conducting randomized control trials (RCTs). Challenges and failure of proper recruitment lead to early termination of trials. Monetary incentives have been suggested as a potential solution to these challenges. Therefore, we aimed to do a systematic review and analysis to evaluate the effect of incentives on the number of participants willing to consent to and participate in RCTs. METHODS: Electronic databases were systematically searched from inception to September 23(rd), 2021, using the following keywords: payments, incentive, response, participation, enrollment, randomized, randomization, and RCT. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess the quality of the included trials. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated with their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). All analyses were done with the random-effects model. We used Revman software to perform the analysis. RESULTS: Six RCTs with 6,253 Participants met the inclusion criteria. Our analysis showed significant improvement in response rate (RR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.55; P = 0.02) and consent rates (RR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.85; P = 0.006) when an incentive payment was offered to participants. Even a small amount of incentive showed significant improvement in both consent (RR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.73; P = 0.03) and response rates (RR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.08, 1.47; P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our meta-analysis demonstrated statistically significant increases in the rate of consent and responses from participants when offered even small monetary value incentives. These findings suggest that incentives may be used to reduce the rate of recruitment failure and subsequent study termination. However, further RCTs are needed to establish a critical threshold beyond which incentive amount does not alter response rates further and the types of RCTs in which financial incentives are likely to be effective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9032371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90323712022-04-23 The effectiveness of incentives for research participation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Abdelazeem, Basel Abbas, Kirellos Said Amin, Mostafa Atef El-Shahat, Nahla Ahmed Malik, Bilal Kalantary, Atefeh Eltobgy, Mostafa PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Recruitment plays a vital role in conducting randomized control trials (RCTs). Challenges and failure of proper recruitment lead to early termination of trials. Monetary incentives have been suggested as a potential solution to these challenges. Therefore, we aimed to do a systematic review and analysis to evaluate the effect of incentives on the number of participants willing to consent to and participate in RCTs. METHODS: Electronic databases were systematically searched from inception to September 23(rd), 2021, using the following keywords: payments, incentive, response, participation, enrollment, randomized, randomization, and RCT. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess the quality of the included trials. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated with their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). All analyses were done with the random-effects model. We used Revman software to perform the analysis. RESULTS: Six RCTs with 6,253 Participants met the inclusion criteria. Our analysis showed significant improvement in response rate (RR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.55; P = 0.02) and consent rates (RR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.85; P = 0.006) when an incentive payment was offered to participants. Even a small amount of incentive showed significant improvement in both consent (RR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.73; P = 0.03) and response rates (RR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.08, 1.47; P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our meta-analysis demonstrated statistically significant increases in the rate of consent and responses from participants when offered even small monetary value incentives. These findings suggest that incentives may be used to reduce the rate of recruitment failure and subsequent study termination. However, further RCTs are needed to establish a critical threshold beyond which incentive amount does not alter response rates further and the types of RCTs in which financial incentives are likely to be effective. Public Library of Science 2022-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9032371/ /pubmed/35452488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267534 Text en © 2022 Abdelazeem et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Abdelazeem, Basel
Abbas, Kirellos Said
Amin, Mostafa Atef
El-Shahat, Nahla Ahmed
Malik, Bilal
Kalantary, Atefeh
Eltobgy, Mostafa
The effectiveness of incentives for research participation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title The effectiveness of incentives for research participation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full The effectiveness of incentives for research participation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr The effectiveness of incentives for research participation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of incentives for research participation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short The effectiveness of incentives for research participation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort effectiveness of incentives for research participation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9032371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35452488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267534
work_keys_str_mv AT abdelazeembasel theeffectivenessofincentivesforresearchparticipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT abbaskirellossaid theeffectivenessofincentivesforresearchparticipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT aminmostafaatef theeffectivenessofincentivesforresearchparticipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT elshahatnahlaahmed theeffectivenessofincentivesforresearchparticipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT malikbilal theeffectivenessofincentivesforresearchparticipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT kalantaryatefeh theeffectivenessofincentivesforresearchparticipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT eltobgymostafa theeffectivenessofincentivesforresearchparticipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT abdelazeembasel effectivenessofincentivesforresearchparticipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT abbaskirellossaid effectivenessofincentivesforresearchparticipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT aminmostafaatef effectivenessofincentivesforresearchparticipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT elshahatnahlaahmed effectivenessofincentivesforresearchparticipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT malikbilal effectivenessofincentivesforresearchparticipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT kalantaryatefeh effectivenessofincentivesforresearchparticipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT eltobgymostafa effectivenessofincentivesforresearchparticipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials