Cargando…

A Comparison of Methods for Identifying Enterobacterales Isolates from Fish and Prawns

Enterobacterales is a prevalent order, which inhabits a variety of environments including food. Due to the high similarities between pathogenic and non-pathogenic species, their identification might be difficult and laborious, and therefore there is a need for rapid and precise identification. The a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zakrzewski, Arkadiusz Józef, Zarzecka, Urszula, Chajęcka-Wierzchowska, Wioleta, Zadernowska, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9032566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35456084
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11040410
_version_ 1784692675187834880
author Zakrzewski, Arkadiusz Józef
Zarzecka, Urszula
Chajęcka-Wierzchowska, Wioleta
Zadernowska, Anna
author_facet Zakrzewski, Arkadiusz Józef
Zarzecka, Urszula
Chajęcka-Wierzchowska, Wioleta
Zadernowska, Anna
author_sort Zakrzewski, Arkadiusz Józef
collection PubMed
description Enterobacterales is a prevalent order, which inhabits a variety of environments including food. Due to the high similarities between pathogenic and non-pathogenic species, their identification might be difficult and laborious, and therefore there is a need for rapid and precise identification. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the available methods of identifying order Enterobacterales strains isolated from fresh fish and shrimps (n = 62). The following methods were used in this study: biochemical, sequencing and identification using the matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). For this purpose, biochemical identification was performed with the use of the EnteroTest 24N set, while the identification using the MALDI-TOF MS technology was operated on VITEK(®) MS. Results were compared with identification made by 16S rRNA sequencing. The results of the study showed that conventional identification methods might provide a false result. Identification by VITEK(®) MS to the species level was correct at 70.97%, and the accuracy of EnteroTest 24N identification did not exceed 50.0%. The genus identification reached 90.32% for the MALDI-TOF technique, while for EnteroTest 24N it was nearly 70.0%. Due to errors in identification, especially of pathogenic organisms, the use of each of these methods should be confirmed by another method, preferably sequencing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9032566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90325662022-04-23 A Comparison of Methods for Identifying Enterobacterales Isolates from Fish and Prawns Zakrzewski, Arkadiusz Józef Zarzecka, Urszula Chajęcka-Wierzchowska, Wioleta Zadernowska, Anna Pathogens Article Enterobacterales is a prevalent order, which inhabits a variety of environments including food. Due to the high similarities between pathogenic and non-pathogenic species, their identification might be difficult and laborious, and therefore there is a need for rapid and precise identification. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the available methods of identifying order Enterobacterales strains isolated from fresh fish and shrimps (n = 62). The following methods were used in this study: biochemical, sequencing and identification using the matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). For this purpose, biochemical identification was performed with the use of the EnteroTest 24N set, while the identification using the MALDI-TOF MS technology was operated on VITEK(®) MS. Results were compared with identification made by 16S rRNA sequencing. The results of the study showed that conventional identification methods might provide a false result. Identification by VITEK(®) MS to the species level was correct at 70.97%, and the accuracy of EnteroTest 24N identification did not exceed 50.0%. The genus identification reached 90.32% for the MALDI-TOF technique, while for EnteroTest 24N it was nearly 70.0%. Due to errors in identification, especially of pathogenic organisms, the use of each of these methods should be confirmed by another method, preferably sequencing. MDPI 2022-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9032566/ /pubmed/35456084 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11040410 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zakrzewski, Arkadiusz Józef
Zarzecka, Urszula
Chajęcka-Wierzchowska, Wioleta
Zadernowska, Anna
A Comparison of Methods for Identifying Enterobacterales Isolates from Fish and Prawns
title A Comparison of Methods for Identifying Enterobacterales Isolates from Fish and Prawns
title_full A Comparison of Methods for Identifying Enterobacterales Isolates from Fish and Prawns
title_fullStr A Comparison of Methods for Identifying Enterobacterales Isolates from Fish and Prawns
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Methods for Identifying Enterobacterales Isolates from Fish and Prawns
title_short A Comparison of Methods for Identifying Enterobacterales Isolates from Fish and Prawns
title_sort comparison of methods for identifying enterobacterales isolates from fish and prawns
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9032566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35456084
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11040410
work_keys_str_mv AT zakrzewskiarkadiuszjozef acomparisonofmethodsforidentifyingenterobacteralesisolatesfromfishandprawns
AT zarzeckaurszula acomparisonofmethodsforidentifyingenterobacteralesisolatesfromfishandprawns
AT chajeckawierzchowskawioleta acomparisonofmethodsforidentifyingenterobacteralesisolatesfromfishandprawns
AT zadernowskaanna acomparisonofmethodsforidentifyingenterobacteralesisolatesfromfishandprawns
AT zakrzewskiarkadiuszjozef comparisonofmethodsforidentifyingenterobacteralesisolatesfromfishandprawns
AT zarzeckaurszula comparisonofmethodsforidentifyingenterobacteralesisolatesfromfishandprawns
AT chajeckawierzchowskawioleta comparisonofmethodsforidentifyingenterobacteralesisolatesfromfishandprawns
AT zadernowskaanna comparisonofmethodsforidentifyingenterobacteralesisolatesfromfishandprawns