Cargando…
A Comparison of Methods for Identifying Enterobacterales Isolates from Fish and Prawns
Enterobacterales is a prevalent order, which inhabits a variety of environments including food. Due to the high similarities between pathogenic and non-pathogenic species, their identification might be difficult and laborious, and therefore there is a need for rapid and precise identification. The a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9032566/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35456084 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11040410 |
_version_ | 1784692675187834880 |
---|---|
author | Zakrzewski, Arkadiusz Józef Zarzecka, Urszula Chajęcka-Wierzchowska, Wioleta Zadernowska, Anna |
author_facet | Zakrzewski, Arkadiusz Józef Zarzecka, Urszula Chajęcka-Wierzchowska, Wioleta Zadernowska, Anna |
author_sort | Zakrzewski, Arkadiusz Józef |
collection | PubMed |
description | Enterobacterales is a prevalent order, which inhabits a variety of environments including food. Due to the high similarities between pathogenic and non-pathogenic species, their identification might be difficult and laborious, and therefore there is a need for rapid and precise identification. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the available methods of identifying order Enterobacterales strains isolated from fresh fish and shrimps (n = 62). The following methods were used in this study: biochemical, sequencing and identification using the matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). For this purpose, biochemical identification was performed with the use of the EnteroTest 24N set, while the identification using the MALDI-TOF MS technology was operated on VITEK(®) MS. Results were compared with identification made by 16S rRNA sequencing. The results of the study showed that conventional identification methods might provide a false result. Identification by VITEK(®) MS to the species level was correct at 70.97%, and the accuracy of EnteroTest 24N identification did not exceed 50.0%. The genus identification reached 90.32% for the MALDI-TOF technique, while for EnteroTest 24N it was nearly 70.0%. Due to errors in identification, especially of pathogenic organisms, the use of each of these methods should be confirmed by another method, preferably sequencing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9032566 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90325662022-04-23 A Comparison of Methods for Identifying Enterobacterales Isolates from Fish and Prawns Zakrzewski, Arkadiusz Józef Zarzecka, Urszula Chajęcka-Wierzchowska, Wioleta Zadernowska, Anna Pathogens Article Enterobacterales is a prevalent order, which inhabits a variety of environments including food. Due to the high similarities between pathogenic and non-pathogenic species, their identification might be difficult and laborious, and therefore there is a need for rapid and precise identification. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the available methods of identifying order Enterobacterales strains isolated from fresh fish and shrimps (n = 62). The following methods were used in this study: biochemical, sequencing and identification using the matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). For this purpose, biochemical identification was performed with the use of the EnteroTest 24N set, while the identification using the MALDI-TOF MS technology was operated on VITEK(®) MS. Results were compared with identification made by 16S rRNA sequencing. The results of the study showed that conventional identification methods might provide a false result. Identification by VITEK(®) MS to the species level was correct at 70.97%, and the accuracy of EnteroTest 24N identification did not exceed 50.0%. The genus identification reached 90.32% for the MALDI-TOF technique, while for EnteroTest 24N it was nearly 70.0%. Due to errors in identification, especially of pathogenic organisms, the use of each of these methods should be confirmed by another method, preferably sequencing. MDPI 2022-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9032566/ /pubmed/35456084 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11040410 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zakrzewski, Arkadiusz Józef Zarzecka, Urszula Chajęcka-Wierzchowska, Wioleta Zadernowska, Anna A Comparison of Methods for Identifying Enterobacterales Isolates from Fish and Prawns |
title | A Comparison of Methods for Identifying Enterobacterales Isolates from Fish and Prawns |
title_full | A Comparison of Methods for Identifying Enterobacterales Isolates from Fish and Prawns |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Methods for Identifying Enterobacterales Isolates from Fish and Prawns |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Methods for Identifying Enterobacterales Isolates from Fish and Prawns |
title_short | A Comparison of Methods for Identifying Enterobacterales Isolates from Fish and Prawns |
title_sort | comparison of methods for identifying enterobacterales isolates from fish and prawns |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9032566/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35456084 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11040410 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zakrzewskiarkadiuszjozef acomparisonofmethodsforidentifyingenterobacteralesisolatesfromfishandprawns AT zarzeckaurszula acomparisonofmethodsforidentifyingenterobacteralesisolatesfromfishandprawns AT chajeckawierzchowskawioleta acomparisonofmethodsforidentifyingenterobacteralesisolatesfromfishandprawns AT zadernowskaanna acomparisonofmethodsforidentifyingenterobacteralesisolatesfromfishandprawns AT zakrzewskiarkadiuszjozef comparisonofmethodsforidentifyingenterobacteralesisolatesfromfishandprawns AT zarzeckaurszula comparisonofmethodsforidentifyingenterobacteralesisolatesfromfishandprawns AT chajeckawierzchowskawioleta comparisonofmethodsforidentifyingenterobacteralesisolatesfromfishandprawns AT zadernowskaanna comparisonofmethodsforidentifyingenterobacteralesisolatesfromfishandprawns |