Cargando…

Are Machine Learning Models on Wrist Accelerometry Robust against Differences in Physical Performance among Older Adults?

Sufficient physical activity (PA) reduces the risk of a myriad of diseases and preserves physical capabilities in later life. While there have been significant achievements in mapping accelerations to real-life movements using machine learning (ML), errors continue to be common, particularly for wri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bai, Chen, Wanigatunga, Amal A., Saldana, Santiago, Casanova, Ramon, Manini, Todd M., Mardini, Mamoun T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9032589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35459045
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22083061
_version_ 1784692681202466816
author Bai, Chen
Wanigatunga, Amal A.
Saldana, Santiago
Casanova, Ramon
Manini, Todd M.
Mardini, Mamoun T.
author_facet Bai, Chen
Wanigatunga, Amal A.
Saldana, Santiago
Casanova, Ramon
Manini, Todd M.
Mardini, Mamoun T.
author_sort Bai, Chen
collection PubMed
description Sufficient physical activity (PA) reduces the risk of a myriad of diseases and preserves physical capabilities in later life. While there have been significant achievements in mapping accelerations to real-life movements using machine learning (ML), errors continue to be common, particularly for wrist-worn devices. It remains unknown whether ML models are robust for estimating age-related loss of physical function. In this study, we evaluated the performance of ML models (XGBoost and LASSO) to estimate the hallmark measures of PA in low physical performance (LPP) and high physical performance (HPP) groups. Our models were built to recognize PA types and intensities, identify each individual activity, and estimate energy expenditure (EE) using wrist-worn accelerometer data (33 activities per participant) from a large sample of participants (n = 247, 57% females, aged 60+ years). Results indicated that the ML models were accurate in recognizing PA by type and intensity while also estimating EE accurately. However, the models built to recognize individual activities were less robust. Across all tasks, XGBoost outperformed LASSO. XGBoost obtained F1-Scores for sedentary (0.932 [Formula: see text] 0.005), locomotion (0.946 [Formula: see text] 0.003), lifestyle (0.927 [Formula: see text] 0.006), and strength flexibility exercise (0.915 [Formula: see text] 0.017) activity type recognition tasks. The F1-Scores for recognizing low, light, and moderate activity intensity were (0.932 [Formula: see text] 0.005), (0.840 [Formula: see text] 0.004), and (0.869 [Formula: see text] 0.005), respectively. The root mean square error for EE estimation was 0.836 [Formula: see text] 0.059 METs. There was no evidence showing that splitting the participants into the LPP and HPP groups improved the models’ performance on estimating the hallmark measures of physical activities. In conclusion, using features derived from wrist-worn accelerometer data, machine learning models can accurately recognize PA types and intensities and estimate EE for older adults with high and low physical function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9032589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90325892022-04-23 Are Machine Learning Models on Wrist Accelerometry Robust against Differences in Physical Performance among Older Adults? Bai, Chen Wanigatunga, Amal A. Saldana, Santiago Casanova, Ramon Manini, Todd M. Mardini, Mamoun T. Sensors (Basel) Article Sufficient physical activity (PA) reduces the risk of a myriad of diseases and preserves physical capabilities in later life. While there have been significant achievements in mapping accelerations to real-life movements using machine learning (ML), errors continue to be common, particularly for wrist-worn devices. It remains unknown whether ML models are robust for estimating age-related loss of physical function. In this study, we evaluated the performance of ML models (XGBoost and LASSO) to estimate the hallmark measures of PA in low physical performance (LPP) and high physical performance (HPP) groups. Our models were built to recognize PA types and intensities, identify each individual activity, and estimate energy expenditure (EE) using wrist-worn accelerometer data (33 activities per participant) from a large sample of participants (n = 247, 57% females, aged 60+ years). Results indicated that the ML models were accurate in recognizing PA by type and intensity while also estimating EE accurately. However, the models built to recognize individual activities were less robust. Across all tasks, XGBoost outperformed LASSO. XGBoost obtained F1-Scores for sedentary (0.932 [Formula: see text] 0.005), locomotion (0.946 [Formula: see text] 0.003), lifestyle (0.927 [Formula: see text] 0.006), and strength flexibility exercise (0.915 [Formula: see text] 0.017) activity type recognition tasks. The F1-Scores for recognizing low, light, and moderate activity intensity were (0.932 [Formula: see text] 0.005), (0.840 [Formula: see text] 0.004), and (0.869 [Formula: see text] 0.005), respectively. The root mean square error for EE estimation was 0.836 [Formula: see text] 0.059 METs. There was no evidence showing that splitting the participants into the LPP and HPP groups improved the models’ performance on estimating the hallmark measures of physical activities. In conclusion, using features derived from wrist-worn accelerometer data, machine learning models can accurately recognize PA types and intensities and estimate EE for older adults with high and low physical function. MDPI 2022-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9032589/ /pubmed/35459045 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22083061 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bai, Chen
Wanigatunga, Amal A.
Saldana, Santiago
Casanova, Ramon
Manini, Todd M.
Mardini, Mamoun T.
Are Machine Learning Models on Wrist Accelerometry Robust against Differences in Physical Performance among Older Adults?
title Are Machine Learning Models on Wrist Accelerometry Robust against Differences in Physical Performance among Older Adults?
title_full Are Machine Learning Models on Wrist Accelerometry Robust against Differences in Physical Performance among Older Adults?
title_fullStr Are Machine Learning Models on Wrist Accelerometry Robust against Differences in Physical Performance among Older Adults?
title_full_unstemmed Are Machine Learning Models on Wrist Accelerometry Robust against Differences in Physical Performance among Older Adults?
title_short Are Machine Learning Models on Wrist Accelerometry Robust against Differences in Physical Performance among Older Adults?
title_sort are machine learning models on wrist accelerometry robust against differences in physical performance among older adults?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9032589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35459045
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22083061
work_keys_str_mv AT baichen aremachinelearningmodelsonwristaccelerometryrobustagainstdifferencesinphysicalperformanceamongolderadults
AT wanigatungaamala aremachinelearningmodelsonwristaccelerometryrobustagainstdifferencesinphysicalperformanceamongolderadults
AT saldanasantiago aremachinelearningmodelsonwristaccelerometryrobustagainstdifferencesinphysicalperformanceamongolderadults
AT casanovaramon aremachinelearningmodelsonwristaccelerometryrobustagainstdifferencesinphysicalperformanceamongolderadults
AT maninitoddm aremachinelearningmodelsonwristaccelerometryrobustagainstdifferencesinphysicalperformanceamongolderadults
AT mardinimamount aremachinelearningmodelsonwristaccelerometryrobustagainstdifferencesinphysicalperformanceamongolderadults