Cargando…

Patients’ Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Controlled Study

Background: As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly important in modern dentistry, we aimed to assess patients’ perspectives on AI in dentistry specifically for radiographic caries detection and the impact of AI-based diagnosis on patients’ trust. Methods: Validated questionnaires with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kosan, Esra, Krois, Joachim, Wingenfeld, Katja, Deuter, Christian Eric, Gaudin, Robert, Schwendicke, Falk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9032784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35456236
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11082143
_version_ 1784692729962299392
author Kosan, Esra
Krois, Joachim
Wingenfeld, Katja
Deuter, Christian Eric
Gaudin, Robert
Schwendicke, Falk
author_facet Kosan, Esra
Krois, Joachim
Wingenfeld, Katja
Deuter, Christian Eric
Gaudin, Robert
Schwendicke, Falk
author_sort Kosan, Esra
collection PubMed
description Background: As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly important in modern dentistry, we aimed to assess patients’ perspectives on AI in dentistry specifically for radiographic caries detection and the impact of AI-based diagnosis on patients’ trust. Methods: Validated questionnaires with Likert-scale batteries (1: “strongly disagree” to 5: “strongly agree”) were used to query participants’ experiences with dental radiographs and their knowledge/attitudes towards AI as well as to assess how AI-based communication of a diagnosis impacted their trust, belief, and understanding. Analyses of variance and ordinal logistic regression (OLR) were used (p < 0.05). Results: Patients were convinced that “AI is useful” (mean Likert ± standard deviation 4.2 ± 0.8) and did not fear AI in general (2.2 ± 1.0) nor in dentistry (1.6 ± 0.8). Age, education, and employment status were significantly associated with patients’ attitudes towards AI for dental diagnostics. When shown a radiograph with a caries lesion highlighted by an arrow, patients recognized the lesion significantly less often than when using AI-generated coloured overlays highlighting the lesion (p < 0.0005). AI-based communication did not significantly affect patients’ trust in dentists’ diagnosis (p = 0.44; OLR). Conclusions: Patients showed a positive attitude towards AI in dentistry. AI-supported diagnostics may assist communicating radiographic findings by increasing patients’ ability to recognize caries lesions on dental radiographs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9032784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90327842022-04-23 Patients’ Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Controlled Study Kosan, Esra Krois, Joachim Wingenfeld, Katja Deuter, Christian Eric Gaudin, Robert Schwendicke, Falk J Clin Med Article Background: As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly important in modern dentistry, we aimed to assess patients’ perspectives on AI in dentistry specifically for radiographic caries detection and the impact of AI-based diagnosis on patients’ trust. Methods: Validated questionnaires with Likert-scale batteries (1: “strongly disagree” to 5: “strongly agree”) were used to query participants’ experiences with dental radiographs and their knowledge/attitudes towards AI as well as to assess how AI-based communication of a diagnosis impacted their trust, belief, and understanding. Analyses of variance and ordinal logistic regression (OLR) were used (p < 0.05). Results: Patients were convinced that “AI is useful” (mean Likert ± standard deviation 4.2 ± 0.8) and did not fear AI in general (2.2 ± 1.0) nor in dentistry (1.6 ± 0.8). Age, education, and employment status were significantly associated with patients’ attitudes towards AI for dental diagnostics. When shown a radiograph with a caries lesion highlighted by an arrow, patients recognized the lesion significantly less often than when using AI-generated coloured overlays highlighting the lesion (p < 0.0005). AI-based communication did not significantly affect patients’ trust in dentists’ diagnosis (p = 0.44; OLR). Conclusions: Patients showed a positive attitude towards AI in dentistry. AI-supported diagnostics may assist communicating radiographic findings by increasing patients’ ability to recognize caries lesions on dental radiographs. MDPI 2022-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9032784/ /pubmed/35456236 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11082143 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kosan, Esra
Krois, Joachim
Wingenfeld, Katja
Deuter, Christian Eric
Gaudin, Robert
Schwendicke, Falk
Patients’ Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Controlled Study
title Patients’ Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Controlled Study
title_full Patients’ Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Controlled Study
title_fullStr Patients’ Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Controlled Study
title_full_unstemmed Patients’ Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Controlled Study
title_short Patients’ Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Controlled Study
title_sort patients’ perspectives on artificial intelligence in dentistry: a controlled study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9032784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35456236
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11082143
work_keys_str_mv AT kosanesra patientsperspectivesonartificialintelligenceindentistryacontrolledstudy
AT kroisjoachim patientsperspectivesonartificialintelligenceindentistryacontrolledstudy
AT wingenfeldkatja patientsperspectivesonartificialintelligenceindentistryacontrolledstudy
AT deuterchristianeric patientsperspectivesonartificialintelligenceindentistryacontrolledstudy
AT gaudinrobert patientsperspectivesonartificialintelligenceindentistryacontrolledstudy
AT schwendickefalk patientsperspectivesonartificialintelligenceindentistryacontrolledstudy