Cargando…

Comparison of Two Diet and Exercise Approaches on Weight Loss and Health Outcomes in Obese Women

Aim: To compare the efficacy of two popular weight loss approaches on weight loss, body composition, and markers of health in sedentary obese women. Methods: In total, 51 sedentary women (age 34.5 ± 7.7 yrs.; weight 90.0 ± 14.5 kg; BMI 34.0 ± 5.1 kg/m(2); 46.5 ± 7.0% fat) were matched and randomized...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lockard, Brittanie, Mardock, Michelle, Oliver, Jonathan M., Byrd, Mike, Simbo, Sunday, Jagim, Andrew R., Kresta, Julie, Baetge, Claire C., Jung, Yanghoon Peter, Koozehchian, Majid S., Khanna, Deepesh, Rasmussen, Chris, Kreider, Richard B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9032860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35457744
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084877
_version_ 1784692749061062656
author Lockard, Brittanie
Mardock, Michelle
Oliver, Jonathan M.
Byrd, Mike
Simbo, Sunday
Jagim, Andrew R.
Kresta, Julie
Baetge, Claire C.
Jung, Yanghoon Peter
Koozehchian, Majid S.
Khanna, Deepesh
Rasmussen, Chris
Kreider, Richard B.
author_facet Lockard, Brittanie
Mardock, Michelle
Oliver, Jonathan M.
Byrd, Mike
Simbo, Sunday
Jagim, Andrew R.
Kresta, Julie
Baetge, Claire C.
Jung, Yanghoon Peter
Koozehchian, Majid S.
Khanna, Deepesh
Rasmussen, Chris
Kreider, Richard B.
author_sort Lockard, Brittanie
collection PubMed
description Aim: To compare the efficacy of two popular weight loss approaches on weight loss, body composition, and markers of health in sedentary obese women. Methods: In total, 51 sedentary women (age 34.5 ± 7.7 yrs.; weight 90.0 ± 14.5 kg; BMI 34.0 ± 5.1 kg/m(2); 46.5 ± 7.0% fat) were matched and randomized to participate in the Weight Watchers(®) Momentum™ (WW) or Curves(®) (CV) Fitness and Weight Management program for 16 weeks. Participants in the WW group (n = 27) were provided a point-based diet program, received weekly progress checks and counseling, and were encouraged to exercise. Participants in the CV group (n = 24) followed a menu-based higher protein/low-fat diet (1200 kcal/d) for 1 week; 1500 kcal/d diet for 3 weeks; and 2000–2500 kcals/d for 2 weeks that was repeated three times (except the last segment) while participating in a supervised circuit-style resistance training program (3 d/wk). A general linear model (GLM) with repeated measures was used to analyze data and are presented as mean changes from baseline (mean [UL, LL]). Results: Supervised CV training resulted in greater amounts of vigorous and total physical activity. After 16 weeks, both groups lost weight (WW −6.1 [−7.8, −4.6], CV −4.9 [−6.2, −3.2] kg, p = 0.264). Participants in the CV group observed greater reductions in fat mass (WW −2.9 [−6.7, −0.2], CV −6.4 [−9.2, −3.6] kg, p = 0.081) and increases in lean mass (WW −2.5 [−4.3, −0.7], CV 1.3 [−0.6, 3.2] kg, p = 0.005) resulting in more favorable changes in percent body fat (WW −1.4 [−4.1, 1.2], CV −4.7 [−7.5, −1.8]%, p = 0.098). Both groups observed improvements in peak aerobic capacity and muscular endurance, although bench press lifting volume was greater in the CV group. Those in the CV group experienced a greater increase in HDLc and reduction in the CHL–HDLc ratio and triglycerides. Conclusion: Both interventions promoted weight loss and improvements in fitness and markers of health. The CV program, which included supervised resistance training and higher protein diet menus, promoted greater fat loss, increases in lean mass, and improvements in percent body fat and blood lipids. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, #NCT04372771, registered retrospectively 1 May 2020.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9032860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90328602022-04-23 Comparison of Two Diet and Exercise Approaches on Weight Loss and Health Outcomes in Obese Women Lockard, Brittanie Mardock, Michelle Oliver, Jonathan M. Byrd, Mike Simbo, Sunday Jagim, Andrew R. Kresta, Julie Baetge, Claire C. Jung, Yanghoon Peter Koozehchian, Majid S. Khanna, Deepesh Rasmussen, Chris Kreider, Richard B. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Aim: To compare the efficacy of two popular weight loss approaches on weight loss, body composition, and markers of health in sedentary obese women. Methods: In total, 51 sedentary women (age 34.5 ± 7.7 yrs.; weight 90.0 ± 14.5 kg; BMI 34.0 ± 5.1 kg/m(2); 46.5 ± 7.0% fat) were matched and randomized to participate in the Weight Watchers(®) Momentum™ (WW) or Curves(®) (CV) Fitness and Weight Management program for 16 weeks. Participants in the WW group (n = 27) were provided a point-based diet program, received weekly progress checks and counseling, and were encouraged to exercise. Participants in the CV group (n = 24) followed a menu-based higher protein/low-fat diet (1200 kcal/d) for 1 week; 1500 kcal/d diet for 3 weeks; and 2000–2500 kcals/d for 2 weeks that was repeated three times (except the last segment) while participating in a supervised circuit-style resistance training program (3 d/wk). A general linear model (GLM) with repeated measures was used to analyze data and are presented as mean changes from baseline (mean [UL, LL]). Results: Supervised CV training resulted in greater amounts of vigorous and total physical activity. After 16 weeks, both groups lost weight (WW −6.1 [−7.8, −4.6], CV −4.9 [−6.2, −3.2] kg, p = 0.264). Participants in the CV group observed greater reductions in fat mass (WW −2.9 [−6.7, −0.2], CV −6.4 [−9.2, −3.6] kg, p = 0.081) and increases in lean mass (WW −2.5 [−4.3, −0.7], CV 1.3 [−0.6, 3.2] kg, p = 0.005) resulting in more favorable changes in percent body fat (WW −1.4 [−4.1, 1.2], CV −4.7 [−7.5, −1.8]%, p = 0.098). Both groups observed improvements in peak aerobic capacity and muscular endurance, although bench press lifting volume was greater in the CV group. Those in the CV group experienced a greater increase in HDLc and reduction in the CHL–HDLc ratio and triglycerides. Conclusion: Both interventions promoted weight loss and improvements in fitness and markers of health. The CV program, which included supervised resistance training and higher protein diet menus, promoted greater fat loss, increases in lean mass, and improvements in percent body fat and blood lipids. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, #NCT04372771, registered retrospectively 1 May 2020. MDPI 2022-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9032860/ /pubmed/35457744 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084877 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lockard, Brittanie
Mardock, Michelle
Oliver, Jonathan M.
Byrd, Mike
Simbo, Sunday
Jagim, Andrew R.
Kresta, Julie
Baetge, Claire C.
Jung, Yanghoon Peter
Koozehchian, Majid S.
Khanna, Deepesh
Rasmussen, Chris
Kreider, Richard B.
Comparison of Two Diet and Exercise Approaches on Weight Loss and Health Outcomes in Obese Women
title Comparison of Two Diet and Exercise Approaches on Weight Loss and Health Outcomes in Obese Women
title_full Comparison of Two Diet and Exercise Approaches on Weight Loss and Health Outcomes in Obese Women
title_fullStr Comparison of Two Diet and Exercise Approaches on Weight Loss and Health Outcomes in Obese Women
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Two Diet and Exercise Approaches on Weight Loss and Health Outcomes in Obese Women
title_short Comparison of Two Diet and Exercise Approaches on Weight Loss and Health Outcomes in Obese Women
title_sort comparison of two diet and exercise approaches on weight loss and health outcomes in obese women
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9032860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35457744
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084877
work_keys_str_mv AT lockardbrittanie comparisonoftwodietandexerciseapproachesonweightlossandhealthoutcomesinobesewomen
AT mardockmichelle comparisonoftwodietandexerciseapproachesonweightlossandhealthoutcomesinobesewomen
AT oliverjonathanm comparisonoftwodietandexerciseapproachesonweightlossandhealthoutcomesinobesewomen
AT byrdmike comparisonoftwodietandexerciseapproachesonweightlossandhealthoutcomesinobesewomen
AT simbosunday comparisonoftwodietandexerciseapproachesonweightlossandhealthoutcomesinobesewomen
AT jagimandrewr comparisonoftwodietandexerciseapproachesonweightlossandhealthoutcomesinobesewomen
AT krestajulie comparisonoftwodietandexerciseapproachesonweightlossandhealthoutcomesinobesewomen
AT baetgeclairec comparisonoftwodietandexerciseapproachesonweightlossandhealthoutcomesinobesewomen
AT jungyanghoonpeter comparisonoftwodietandexerciseapproachesonweightlossandhealthoutcomesinobesewomen
AT koozehchianmajids comparisonoftwodietandexerciseapproachesonweightlossandhealthoutcomesinobesewomen
AT khannadeepesh comparisonoftwodietandexerciseapproachesonweightlossandhealthoutcomesinobesewomen
AT rasmussenchris comparisonoftwodietandexerciseapproachesonweightlossandhealthoutcomesinobesewomen
AT kreiderrichardb comparisonoftwodietandexerciseapproachesonweightlossandhealthoutcomesinobesewomen