Cargando…

Exploring Social Support Networks and Interactions of Young Adult and LGBTQIA+ Cancer Survivors and Care Partners

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe the social support networks and daily support interactions of cancer-affected individuals, including young adult (YA) and LGBTQIA+ survivors and care partners. METHODS: Participants were recruited at two United States cancer centers and via social m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cloyes, Kristin G., Guo, Jia-Wen, Tennant, Karrin E., McCormick, Rachael, Mansfield, Kelly J., Wawrzynski, Sarah E., Classen, Sarah C., Jones, Eric C., Reblin, Maija
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9033283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35463370
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.852267
_version_ 1784692850626134016
author Cloyes, Kristin G.
Guo, Jia-Wen
Tennant, Karrin E.
McCormick, Rachael
Mansfield, Kelly J.
Wawrzynski, Sarah E.
Classen, Sarah C.
Jones, Eric C.
Reblin, Maija
author_facet Cloyes, Kristin G.
Guo, Jia-Wen
Tennant, Karrin E.
McCormick, Rachael
Mansfield, Kelly J.
Wawrzynski, Sarah E.
Classen, Sarah C.
Jones, Eric C.
Reblin, Maija
author_sort Cloyes, Kristin G.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe the social support networks and daily support interactions of cancer-affected individuals, including young adult (YA) and LGBTQIA+ survivors and care partners. METHODS: Participants were recruited at two United States cancer centers and via social media for a pilot study testing a novel online method for collecting prospective, daily social support interaction data (N=28). All participants were aged 18+; survivors had a current or recent cancer diagnosis and were engaged in treatment and/or services; care partners were identified by the survivors. Enrollment also purposefully targeted YA and LGBTQIA+ survivors. Social network data (up to 10 members) were assessed at baseline. Daily online surveys assessed support interactions between participants and specific network members over 14 days. Descriptive statistics summarized data and explored between-group (YA/non-YA, LGBTQIA+/non-LGBTQIA+) differences in social network characteristics (size, heterogeneity, density, centralization, cohesion) and support interactions (support source and type). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between YA and non-YA participants on any measures. LGBTQIA+ participants’ support networks were less dense (Mdn=0.69 vs. 0.82, p=.02), less cohesive (Mdn=0.85 vs. 0.91,.02), more centered on the participant (Mdn=0.40 vs. 0.24, p=.047), and included more LGBTQIA+ members (Mdn=0.35 vs. 0.00, p<.001). LGBTQIA+ participants reported having more interactions with LGBTQIA+ network members (Mdn=14.0 vs. Mdn=0.00, p<.001) and received significantly more of all types of support from LGBTQIA+ vs. non-LGBTQIA+ members. LGBTQIA+ participants also reported receiving more appraisal support than non-LGBTQIA+ (Mdn 21.64 vs. 9.12, p=.008) including more appraisal support from relatives (Mdn=11.73 vs 6.0, p+.037). CONCLUSIONS: Important information related to support access, engagement, and needs is embedded within the everyday contexts of the social networks of cancer-affected people. Individualized, accessible, and prospective assessment could help illuminate how their “real world” support systems are working and identify specific strengths and unmet needs. These insights would inform the development of more culturally competent and tailored interventions to help people understand and leverage their unique support systems. This is particularly critical for groups like YA and LGBTQIA+ survivors and care partners that are underserved by formal support services and underrepresented in cancer, caregiving, and social support research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9033283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90332832022-04-23 Exploring Social Support Networks and Interactions of Young Adult and LGBTQIA+ Cancer Survivors and Care Partners Cloyes, Kristin G. Guo, Jia-Wen Tennant, Karrin E. McCormick, Rachael Mansfield, Kelly J. Wawrzynski, Sarah E. Classen, Sarah C. Jones, Eric C. Reblin, Maija Front Oncol Oncology PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe the social support networks and daily support interactions of cancer-affected individuals, including young adult (YA) and LGBTQIA+ survivors and care partners. METHODS: Participants were recruited at two United States cancer centers and via social media for a pilot study testing a novel online method for collecting prospective, daily social support interaction data (N=28). All participants were aged 18+; survivors had a current or recent cancer diagnosis and were engaged in treatment and/or services; care partners were identified by the survivors. Enrollment also purposefully targeted YA and LGBTQIA+ survivors. Social network data (up to 10 members) were assessed at baseline. Daily online surveys assessed support interactions between participants and specific network members over 14 days. Descriptive statistics summarized data and explored between-group (YA/non-YA, LGBTQIA+/non-LGBTQIA+) differences in social network characteristics (size, heterogeneity, density, centralization, cohesion) and support interactions (support source and type). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between YA and non-YA participants on any measures. LGBTQIA+ participants’ support networks were less dense (Mdn=0.69 vs. 0.82, p=.02), less cohesive (Mdn=0.85 vs. 0.91,.02), more centered on the participant (Mdn=0.40 vs. 0.24, p=.047), and included more LGBTQIA+ members (Mdn=0.35 vs. 0.00, p<.001). LGBTQIA+ participants reported having more interactions with LGBTQIA+ network members (Mdn=14.0 vs. Mdn=0.00, p<.001) and received significantly more of all types of support from LGBTQIA+ vs. non-LGBTQIA+ members. LGBTQIA+ participants also reported receiving more appraisal support than non-LGBTQIA+ (Mdn 21.64 vs. 9.12, p=.008) including more appraisal support from relatives (Mdn=11.73 vs 6.0, p+.037). CONCLUSIONS: Important information related to support access, engagement, and needs is embedded within the everyday contexts of the social networks of cancer-affected people. Individualized, accessible, and prospective assessment could help illuminate how their “real world” support systems are working and identify specific strengths and unmet needs. These insights would inform the development of more culturally competent and tailored interventions to help people understand and leverage their unique support systems. This is particularly critical for groups like YA and LGBTQIA+ survivors and care partners that are underserved by formal support services and underrepresented in cancer, caregiving, and social support research. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9033283/ /pubmed/35463370 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.852267 Text en Copyright © 2022 Cloyes, Guo, Tennant, McCormick, Mansfield, Wawrzynski, Classen, Jones and Reblin https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Cloyes, Kristin G.
Guo, Jia-Wen
Tennant, Karrin E.
McCormick, Rachael
Mansfield, Kelly J.
Wawrzynski, Sarah E.
Classen, Sarah C.
Jones, Eric C.
Reblin, Maija
Exploring Social Support Networks and Interactions of Young Adult and LGBTQIA+ Cancer Survivors and Care Partners
title Exploring Social Support Networks and Interactions of Young Adult and LGBTQIA+ Cancer Survivors and Care Partners
title_full Exploring Social Support Networks and Interactions of Young Adult and LGBTQIA+ Cancer Survivors and Care Partners
title_fullStr Exploring Social Support Networks and Interactions of Young Adult and LGBTQIA+ Cancer Survivors and Care Partners
title_full_unstemmed Exploring Social Support Networks and Interactions of Young Adult and LGBTQIA+ Cancer Survivors and Care Partners
title_short Exploring Social Support Networks and Interactions of Young Adult and LGBTQIA+ Cancer Survivors and Care Partners
title_sort exploring social support networks and interactions of young adult and lgbtqia+ cancer survivors and care partners
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9033283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35463370
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.852267
work_keys_str_mv AT cloyeskristing exploringsocialsupportnetworksandinteractionsofyoungadultandlgbtqiacancersurvivorsandcarepartners
AT guojiawen exploringsocialsupportnetworksandinteractionsofyoungadultandlgbtqiacancersurvivorsandcarepartners
AT tennantkarrine exploringsocialsupportnetworksandinteractionsofyoungadultandlgbtqiacancersurvivorsandcarepartners
AT mccormickrachael exploringsocialsupportnetworksandinteractionsofyoungadultandlgbtqiacancersurvivorsandcarepartners
AT mansfieldkellyj exploringsocialsupportnetworksandinteractionsofyoungadultandlgbtqiacancersurvivorsandcarepartners
AT wawrzynskisarahe exploringsocialsupportnetworksandinteractionsofyoungadultandlgbtqiacancersurvivorsandcarepartners
AT classensarahc exploringsocialsupportnetworksandinteractionsofyoungadultandlgbtqiacancersurvivorsandcarepartners
AT jonesericc exploringsocialsupportnetworksandinteractionsofyoungadultandlgbtqiacancersurvivorsandcarepartners
AT reblinmaija exploringsocialsupportnetworksandinteractionsofyoungadultandlgbtqiacancersurvivorsandcarepartners