Cargando…

Introduction of Lazy Luna an automatic software-driven multilevel comparison of ventricular function quantification in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging is the gold standard for cardiac function assessment. Quantification of clinical results (CR) requires precise segmentation. Clinicians statistically compare CRs to ensure reproducibility. Convolutional Neural Network developers compare their results via met...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hadler, Thomas, Wetzl, Jens, Lange, Steffen, Geppert, Christian, Fenski, Max, Abazi, Endri, Gröschel, Jan, Ammann, Clemens, Wenson, Felix, Töpper, Agnieszka, Däuber, Sascha, Schulz-Menger, Jeanette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9033783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35459270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10464-w
_version_ 1784692974134755328
author Hadler, Thomas
Wetzl, Jens
Lange, Steffen
Geppert, Christian
Fenski, Max
Abazi, Endri
Gröschel, Jan
Ammann, Clemens
Wenson, Felix
Töpper, Agnieszka
Däuber, Sascha
Schulz-Menger, Jeanette
author_facet Hadler, Thomas
Wetzl, Jens
Lange, Steffen
Geppert, Christian
Fenski, Max
Abazi, Endri
Gröschel, Jan
Ammann, Clemens
Wenson, Felix
Töpper, Agnieszka
Däuber, Sascha
Schulz-Menger, Jeanette
author_sort Hadler, Thomas
collection PubMed
description Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging is the gold standard for cardiac function assessment. Quantification of clinical results (CR) requires precise segmentation. Clinicians statistically compare CRs to ensure reproducibility. Convolutional Neural Network developers compare their results via metrics. Aim: Introducing software capable of automatic multilevel comparison. A multilevel analysis covering segmentations and CRs builds on a generic software backend. Metrics and CRs are calculated with geometric accuracy. Segmentations and CRs are connected to track errors and their effects. An interactive GUI makes the software accessible to different users. The software’s multilevel comparison was tested on a use case based on cardiac function assessment. The software shows good reader agreement in CRs and segmentation metrics (Dice > 90%). Decomposing differences by cardiac position revealed excellent agreement in midventricular slices: > 90% but poorer segmentations in apical (> 71%) and basal slices (> 74%). Further decomposition by contour type locates the largest millilitre differences in the basal right cavity (> 3 ml). Visual inspection shows these differences being caused by different basal slice choices. The software illuminated reader differences on several levels. Producing spreadsheets and figures concerning metric values and CR differences was automated. A multilevel reader comparison is feasible and extendable to other cardiac structures in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9033783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90337832022-04-25 Introduction of Lazy Luna an automatic software-driven multilevel comparison of ventricular function quantification in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging Hadler, Thomas Wetzl, Jens Lange, Steffen Geppert, Christian Fenski, Max Abazi, Endri Gröschel, Jan Ammann, Clemens Wenson, Felix Töpper, Agnieszka Däuber, Sascha Schulz-Menger, Jeanette Sci Rep Article Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging is the gold standard for cardiac function assessment. Quantification of clinical results (CR) requires precise segmentation. Clinicians statistically compare CRs to ensure reproducibility. Convolutional Neural Network developers compare their results via metrics. Aim: Introducing software capable of automatic multilevel comparison. A multilevel analysis covering segmentations and CRs builds on a generic software backend. Metrics and CRs are calculated with geometric accuracy. Segmentations and CRs are connected to track errors and their effects. An interactive GUI makes the software accessible to different users. The software’s multilevel comparison was tested on a use case based on cardiac function assessment. The software shows good reader agreement in CRs and segmentation metrics (Dice > 90%). Decomposing differences by cardiac position revealed excellent agreement in midventricular slices: > 90% but poorer segmentations in apical (> 71%) and basal slices (> 74%). Further decomposition by contour type locates the largest millilitre differences in the basal right cavity (> 3 ml). Visual inspection shows these differences being caused by different basal slice choices. The software illuminated reader differences on several levels. Producing spreadsheets and figures concerning metric values and CR differences was automated. A multilevel reader comparison is feasible and extendable to other cardiac structures in the future. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9033783/ /pubmed/35459270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10464-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Hadler, Thomas
Wetzl, Jens
Lange, Steffen
Geppert, Christian
Fenski, Max
Abazi, Endri
Gröschel, Jan
Ammann, Clemens
Wenson, Felix
Töpper, Agnieszka
Däuber, Sascha
Schulz-Menger, Jeanette
Introduction of Lazy Luna an automatic software-driven multilevel comparison of ventricular function quantification in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
title Introduction of Lazy Luna an automatic software-driven multilevel comparison of ventricular function quantification in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
title_full Introduction of Lazy Luna an automatic software-driven multilevel comparison of ventricular function quantification in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
title_fullStr Introduction of Lazy Luna an automatic software-driven multilevel comparison of ventricular function quantification in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
title_full_unstemmed Introduction of Lazy Luna an automatic software-driven multilevel comparison of ventricular function quantification in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
title_short Introduction of Lazy Luna an automatic software-driven multilevel comparison of ventricular function quantification in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
title_sort introduction of lazy luna an automatic software-driven multilevel comparison of ventricular function quantification in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9033783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35459270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10464-w
work_keys_str_mv AT hadlerthomas introductionoflazylunaanautomaticsoftwaredrivenmultilevelcomparisonofventricularfunctionquantificationincardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaging
AT wetzljens introductionoflazylunaanautomaticsoftwaredrivenmultilevelcomparisonofventricularfunctionquantificationincardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaging
AT langesteffen introductionoflazylunaanautomaticsoftwaredrivenmultilevelcomparisonofventricularfunctionquantificationincardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaging
AT geppertchristian introductionoflazylunaanautomaticsoftwaredrivenmultilevelcomparisonofventricularfunctionquantificationincardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaging
AT fenskimax introductionoflazylunaanautomaticsoftwaredrivenmultilevelcomparisonofventricularfunctionquantificationincardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaging
AT abaziendri introductionoflazylunaanautomaticsoftwaredrivenmultilevelcomparisonofventricularfunctionquantificationincardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaging
AT groscheljan introductionoflazylunaanautomaticsoftwaredrivenmultilevelcomparisonofventricularfunctionquantificationincardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaging
AT ammannclemens introductionoflazylunaanautomaticsoftwaredrivenmultilevelcomparisonofventricularfunctionquantificationincardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaging
AT wensonfelix introductionoflazylunaanautomaticsoftwaredrivenmultilevelcomparisonofventricularfunctionquantificationincardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaging
AT topperagnieszka introductionoflazylunaanautomaticsoftwaredrivenmultilevelcomparisonofventricularfunctionquantificationincardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaging
AT daubersascha introductionoflazylunaanautomaticsoftwaredrivenmultilevelcomparisonofventricularfunctionquantificationincardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaging
AT schulzmengerjeanette introductionoflazylunaanautomaticsoftwaredrivenmultilevelcomparisonofventricularfunctionquantificationincardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaging