Cargando…
Introduction of Lazy Luna an automatic software-driven multilevel comparison of ventricular function quantification in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging is the gold standard for cardiac function assessment. Quantification of clinical results (CR) requires precise segmentation. Clinicians statistically compare CRs to ensure reproducibility. Convolutional Neural Network developers compare their results via met...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9033783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35459270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10464-w |
_version_ | 1784692974134755328 |
---|---|
author | Hadler, Thomas Wetzl, Jens Lange, Steffen Geppert, Christian Fenski, Max Abazi, Endri Gröschel, Jan Ammann, Clemens Wenson, Felix Töpper, Agnieszka Däuber, Sascha Schulz-Menger, Jeanette |
author_facet | Hadler, Thomas Wetzl, Jens Lange, Steffen Geppert, Christian Fenski, Max Abazi, Endri Gröschel, Jan Ammann, Clemens Wenson, Felix Töpper, Agnieszka Däuber, Sascha Schulz-Menger, Jeanette |
author_sort | Hadler, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging is the gold standard for cardiac function assessment. Quantification of clinical results (CR) requires precise segmentation. Clinicians statistically compare CRs to ensure reproducibility. Convolutional Neural Network developers compare their results via metrics. Aim: Introducing software capable of automatic multilevel comparison. A multilevel analysis covering segmentations and CRs builds on a generic software backend. Metrics and CRs are calculated with geometric accuracy. Segmentations and CRs are connected to track errors and their effects. An interactive GUI makes the software accessible to different users. The software’s multilevel comparison was tested on a use case based on cardiac function assessment. The software shows good reader agreement in CRs and segmentation metrics (Dice > 90%). Decomposing differences by cardiac position revealed excellent agreement in midventricular slices: > 90% but poorer segmentations in apical (> 71%) and basal slices (> 74%). Further decomposition by contour type locates the largest millilitre differences in the basal right cavity (> 3 ml). Visual inspection shows these differences being caused by different basal slice choices. The software illuminated reader differences on several levels. Producing spreadsheets and figures concerning metric values and CR differences was automated. A multilevel reader comparison is feasible and extendable to other cardiac structures in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9033783 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90337832022-04-25 Introduction of Lazy Luna an automatic software-driven multilevel comparison of ventricular function quantification in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging Hadler, Thomas Wetzl, Jens Lange, Steffen Geppert, Christian Fenski, Max Abazi, Endri Gröschel, Jan Ammann, Clemens Wenson, Felix Töpper, Agnieszka Däuber, Sascha Schulz-Menger, Jeanette Sci Rep Article Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging is the gold standard for cardiac function assessment. Quantification of clinical results (CR) requires precise segmentation. Clinicians statistically compare CRs to ensure reproducibility. Convolutional Neural Network developers compare their results via metrics. Aim: Introducing software capable of automatic multilevel comparison. A multilevel analysis covering segmentations and CRs builds on a generic software backend. Metrics and CRs are calculated with geometric accuracy. Segmentations and CRs are connected to track errors and their effects. An interactive GUI makes the software accessible to different users. The software’s multilevel comparison was tested on a use case based on cardiac function assessment. The software shows good reader agreement in CRs and segmentation metrics (Dice > 90%). Decomposing differences by cardiac position revealed excellent agreement in midventricular slices: > 90% but poorer segmentations in apical (> 71%) and basal slices (> 74%). Further decomposition by contour type locates the largest millilitre differences in the basal right cavity (> 3 ml). Visual inspection shows these differences being caused by different basal slice choices. The software illuminated reader differences on several levels. Producing spreadsheets and figures concerning metric values and CR differences was automated. A multilevel reader comparison is feasible and extendable to other cardiac structures in the future. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9033783/ /pubmed/35459270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10464-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Hadler, Thomas Wetzl, Jens Lange, Steffen Geppert, Christian Fenski, Max Abazi, Endri Gröschel, Jan Ammann, Clemens Wenson, Felix Töpper, Agnieszka Däuber, Sascha Schulz-Menger, Jeanette Introduction of Lazy Luna an automatic software-driven multilevel comparison of ventricular function quantification in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging |
title | Introduction of Lazy Luna an automatic software-driven multilevel comparison of ventricular function quantification in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging |
title_full | Introduction of Lazy Luna an automatic software-driven multilevel comparison of ventricular function quantification in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging |
title_fullStr | Introduction of Lazy Luna an automatic software-driven multilevel comparison of ventricular function quantification in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Introduction of Lazy Luna an automatic software-driven multilevel comparison of ventricular function quantification in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging |
title_short | Introduction of Lazy Luna an automatic software-driven multilevel comparison of ventricular function quantification in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging |
title_sort | introduction of lazy luna an automatic software-driven multilevel comparison of ventricular function quantification in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9033783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35459270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10464-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hadlerthomas introductionoflazylunaanautomaticsoftwaredrivenmultilevelcomparisonofventricularfunctionquantificationincardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaging AT wetzljens introductionoflazylunaanautomaticsoftwaredrivenmultilevelcomparisonofventricularfunctionquantificationincardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaging AT langesteffen introductionoflazylunaanautomaticsoftwaredrivenmultilevelcomparisonofventricularfunctionquantificationincardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaging AT geppertchristian introductionoflazylunaanautomaticsoftwaredrivenmultilevelcomparisonofventricularfunctionquantificationincardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaging AT fenskimax introductionoflazylunaanautomaticsoftwaredrivenmultilevelcomparisonofventricularfunctionquantificationincardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaging AT abaziendri introductionoflazylunaanautomaticsoftwaredrivenmultilevelcomparisonofventricularfunctionquantificationincardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaging AT groscheljan introductionoflazylunaanautomaticsoftwaredrivenmultilevelcomparisonofventricularfunctionquantificationincardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaging AT ammannclemens introductionoflazylunaanautomaticsoftwaredrivenmultilevelcomparisonofventricularfunctionquantificationincardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaging AT wensonfelix introductionoflazylunaanautomaticsoftwaredrivenmultilevelcomparisonofventricularfunctionquantificationincardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaging AT topperagnieszka introductionoflazylunaanautomaticsoftwaredrivenmultilevelcomparisonofventricularfunctionquantificationincardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaging AT daubersascha introductionoflazylunaanautomaticsoftwaredrivenmultilevelcomparisonofventricularfunctionquantificationincardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaging AT schulzmengerjeanette introductionoflazylunaanautomaticsoftwaredrivenmultilevelcomparisonofventricularfunctionquantificationincardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaging |