Cargando…
Uncertainty in GRACE/GRACE-follow on global ocean mass change estimates due to mis-modeled glacial isostatic adjustment and geocenter motion
Global mean sea level has increased about 3 mm/yr over several decades due to increases in ocean mass and changes in sea water density. Ocean mass, accounting for about two-thirds of the increase, can be directly measured by the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and GRACE Follow-On (GF...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9033860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35459768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10628-8 |
_version_ | 1784692992674627584 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Jae-Seung Seo, Ki-Weon Chen, Jianli Wilson, Clark |
author_facet | Kim, Jae-Seung Seo, Ki-Weon Chen, Jianli Wilson, Clark |
author_sort | Kim, Jae-Seung |
collection | PubMed |
description | Global mean sea level has increased about 3 mm/yr over several decades due to increases in ocean mass and changes in sea water density. Ocean mass, accounting for about two-thirds of the increase, can be directly measured by the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and GRACE Follow-On (GFO) satellites. An independent measure is obtained by combining satellite altimetry (measuring total sea level change) and Argo float data (measuring steric changes associated with sea water density). Many previous studies have reported that the two estimates of global mean ocean mass (GMOM) change are in good agreement within stated confidence intervals. Recently, particularly since 2016, estimates by the two methods have diverged. A partial explanation appears to be a spurious variation in steric sea level data. An additional contributor may be deficiencies in Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) corrections and degree-1 spherical harmonic (SH) coefficients. We found that erroneous corrections for GIA contaminate GRACE/GFO estimates as time goes forward. Errors in GIA corrections affect degree-1 SH coefficients, and degree-1 errors may also be associated with ocean dynamics. Poor estimates of degree-1 SH coefficients are likely an important source of discrepancies in the two methods of estimating GMOM change. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9033860 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90338602022-04-25 Uncertainty in GRACE/GRACE-follow on global ocean mass change estimates due to mis-modeled glacial isostatic adjustment and geocenter motion Kim, Jae-Seung Seo, Ki-Weon Chen, Jianli Wilson, Clark Sci Rep Article Global mean sea level has increased about 3 mm/yr over several decades due to increases in ocean mass and changes in sea water density. Ocean mass, accounting for about two-thirds of the increase, can be directly measured by the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and GRACE Follow-On (GFO) satellites. An independent measure is obtained by combining satellite altimetry (measuring total sea level change) and Argo float data (measuring steric changes associated with sea water density). Many previous studies have reported that the two estimates of global mean ocean mass (GMOM) change are in good agreement within stated confidence intervals. Recently, particularly since 2016, estimates by the two methods have diverged. A partial explanation appears to be a spurious variation in steric sea level data. An additional contributor may be deficiencies in Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) corrections and degree-1 spherical harmonic (SH) coefficients. We found that erroneous corrections for GIA contaminate GRACE/GFO estimates as time goes forward. Errors in GIA corrections affect degree-1 SH coefficients, and degree-1 errors may also be associated with ocean dynamics. Poor estimates of degree-1 SH coefficients are likely an important source of discrepancies in the two methods of estimating GMOM change. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9033860/ /pubmed/35459768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10628-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Kim, Jae-Seung Seo, Ki-Weon Chen, Jianli Wilson, Clark Uncertainty in GRACE/GRACE-follow on global ocean mass change estimates due to mis-modeled glacial isostatic adjustment and geocenter motion |
title | Uncertainty in GRACE/GRACE-follow on global ocean mass change estimates due to mis-modeled glacial isostatic adjustment and geocenter motion |
title_full | Uncertainty in GRACE/GRACE-follow on global ocean mass change estimates due to mis-modeled glacial isostatic adjustment and geocenter motion |
title_fullStr | Uncertainty in GRACE/GRACE-follow on global ocean mass change estimates due to mis-modeled glacial isostatic adjustment and geocenter motion |
title_full_unstemmed | Uncertainty in GRACE/GRACE-follow on global ocean mass change estimates due to mis-modeled glacial isostatic adjustment and geocenter motion |
title_short | Uncertainty in GRACE/GRACE-follow on global ocean mass change estimates due to mis-modeled glacial isostatic adjustment and geocenter motion |
title_sort | uncertainty in grace/grace-follow on global ocean mass change estimates due to mis-modeled glacial isostatic adjustment and geocenter motion |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9033860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35459768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10628-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimjaeseung uncertaintyingracegracefollowonglobaloceanmasschangeestimatesduetomismodeledglacialisostaticadjustmentandgeocentermotion AT seokiweon uncertaintyingracegracefollowonglobaloceanmasschangeestimatesduetomismodeledglacialisostaticadjustmentandgeocentermotion AT chenjianli uncertaintyingracegracefollowonglobaloceanmasschangeestimatesduetomismodeledglacialisostaticadjustmentandgeocentermotion AT wilsonclark uncertaintyingracegracefollowonglobaloceanmasschangeestimatesduetomismodeledglacialisostaticadjustmentandgeocentermotion |