Cargando…

Long-term administration of fisetin was not as effective as short term in ameliorating IR injury in isolated rat heart

The current study aims to determine the comparative efficacy of fisetin in reducing myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury (IR) in isolated rat hearts when the drug was given either oral or intraperitoneal (ip) for short-term and long-term administration. Rats treated with fisetin (20 mg/kg-oral/ip)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prem, Priyanka N., Sivakumar, Bhavana, Boovarahan, Sri Rahavi, Kurian, Gino A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9033933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35460340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00210-022-02239-x
_version_ 1784693001397731328
author Prem, Priyanka N.
Sivakumar, Bhavana
Boovarahan, Sri Rahavi
Kurian, Gino A.
author_facet Prem, Priyanka N.
Sivakumar, Bhavana
Boovarahan, Sri Rahavi
Kurian, Gino A.
author_sort Prem, Priyanka N.
collection PubMed
description The current study aims to determine the comparative efficacy of fisetin in reducing myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury (IR) in isolated rat hearts when the drug was given either oral or intraperitoneal (ip) for short-term and long-term administration. Rats treated with fisetin (20 mg/kg-oral/ip) for short (30 min prior to surgery) and long (15 days prior to surgery followed by 1-day washout) duration were subjected to myocardial IR using Langendorf perfusion system. Hemodynamics, cardiac injury, mitochondrial functional assessment, and fisetin levels were estimated. Unlike the long-term administration of fisetin, the short-term treated-rat heart exhibited significant cardioprotection, measured via hemodynamic indices (RPP in mmHg × beats/min × 10 (^ 4): IR — 4 ± 0.1, FIPS — 2.49 ± 0.18, FIPL — 1.87 ± 0.14), reduced infarct size (in % area of infarct: IR — 38 ± 5, FIPS — 17 ± 1, FOS — 14 ± 2), improved mitochondrial ETC enzyme activity (NQR activity in IFM: FIPS — 0.25 ± 0.016, FIPL — 0.20 ± 0.02), and declined oxidative stress (GSH in IFM: FIPS — 1.52 ± 0.14, FIPL — 1.25 ± 0.22). However, no significant difference in the protection was observed between the animals treated with oral or intraperitoneally administered fisetin. Single dose of fisetin administration before IR protocol was more effective than 15 days of fisetin-treated drug followed by 1-day washout, thus may not be suitable for long-term dietary supplement for post-surgical cardiac rehabilitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9033933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90339332022-04-25 Long-term administration of fisetin was not as effective as short term in ameliorating IR injury in isolated rat heart Prem, Priyanka N. Sivakumar, Bhavana Boovarahan, Sri Rahavi Kurian, Gino A. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol Brief Communication The current study aims to determine the comparative efficacy of fisetin in reducing myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury (IR) in isolated rat hearts when the drug was given either oral or intraperitoneal (ip) for short-term and long-term administration. Rats treated with fisetin (20 mg/kg-oral/ip) for short (30 min prior to surgery) and long (15 days prior to surgery followed by 1-day washout) duration were subjected to myocardial IR using Langendorf perfusion system. Hemodynamics, cardiac injury, mitochondrial functional assessment, and fisetin levels were estimated. Unlike the long-term administration of fisetin, the short-term treated-rat heart exhibited significant cardioprotection, measured via hemodynamic indices (RPP in mmHg × beats/min × 10 (^ 4): IR — 4 ± 0.1, FIPS — 2.49 ± 0.18, FIPL — 1.87 ± 0.14), reduced infarct size (in % area of infarct: IR — 38 ± 5, FIPS — 17 ± 1, FOS — 14 ± 2), improved mitochondrial ETC enzyme activity (NQR activity in IFM: FIPS — 0.25 ± 0.016, FIPL — 0.20 ± 0.02), and declined oxidative stress (GSH in IFM: FIPS — 1.52 ± 0.14, FIPL — 1.25 ± 0.22). However, no significant difference in the protection was observed between the animals treated with oral or intraperitoneally administered fisetin. Single dose of fisetin administration before IR protocol was more effective than 15 days of fisetin-treated drug followed by 1-day washout, thus may not be suitable for long-term dietary supplement for post-surgical cardiac rehabilitation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-04-23 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9033933/ /pubmed/35460340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00210-022-02239-x Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Brief Communication
Prem, Priyanka N.
Sivakumar, Bhavana
Boovarahan, Sri Rahavi
Kurian, Gino A.
Long-term administration of fisetin was not as effective as short term in ameliorating IR injury in isolated rat heart
title Long-term administration of fisetin was not as effective as short term in ameliorating IR injury in isolated rat heart
title_full Long-term administration of fisetin was not as effective as short term in ameliorating IR injury in isolated rat heart
title_fullStr Long-term administration of fisetin was not as effective as short term in ameliorating IR injury in isolated rat heart
title_full_unstemmed Long-term administration of fisetin was not as effective as short term in ameliorating IR injury in isolated rat heart
title_short Long-term administration of fisetin was not as effective as short term in ameliorating IR injury in isolated rat heart
title_sort long-term administration of fisetin was not as effective as short term in ameliorating ir injury in isolated rat heart
topic Brief Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9033933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35460340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00210-022-02239-x
work_keys_str_mv AT prempriyankan longtermadministrationoffisetinwasnotaseffectiveasshortterminamelioratingirinjuryinisolatedratheart
AT sivakumarbhavana longtermadministrationoffisetinwasnotaseffectiveasshortterminamelioratingirinjuryinisolatedratheart
AT boovarahansrirahavi longtermadministrationoffisetinwasnotaseffectiveasshortterminamelioratingirinjuryinisolatedratheart
AT kurianginoa longtermadministrationoffisetinwasnotaseffectiveasshortterminamelioratingirinjuryinisolatedratheart