Cargando…
Chemical structure stabilities of a Si(x)F(y) (x ≤ 6, y ≤ 12) series
In this paper, we construct a Si(x)F(y) (x ≤ 6, y ≤ 12) series optimised at the B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level. At the same level, we perform frontline molecular orbital (FMO), Mayer bond order (MBO), molecular surface electrostatic potential (MS-EPS) and natural population analysis (NPA) calculations to st...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society of Chemistry
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9034129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35478778 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1ra03526f |
Sumario: | In this paper, we construct a Si(x)F(y) (x ≤ 6, y ≤ 12) series optimised at the B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level. At the same level, we perform frontline molecular orbital (FMO), Mayer bond order (MBO), molecular surface electrostatic potential (MS-EPS) and natural population analysis (NPA) calculations to study the chemical structure stabilities of these Si(x)F(y) molecules. The FMO and MBO results demonstrate that the chemical structure stabilities of the Si(x)F(y) (x ≤ 6, y ≤ 12) series are ranked (from strong to weak) as SiF(4) > Si(2)F(6) > Si(3)F(8) > Si(4)F(10) > SiF(2) > Si(5)F(12) > Si(3)F(6) (ring) > Si(5)F(10) (ring) > Si(6)F(12) (ring) > Si(4)F(8) (ring). Furthermore, the chemical structure stabilities of the chains are stronger than those of the rings, while the number of silicon atoms is the same. In addition, infrared spectroscopy analysis shows that SiF(4) is the most stable among the Si(x)F(y) (x ≤ 6, y ≤ 12) series, followed by Si(2)F(6), and SiF(2) is unstable. The experimental results are consistent with theoretical calculations. Finally, the MS-EPS and NPA results indicate that compounds in the Si(x)F(y) (x ≤ 6, y ≤ 12) series tend to be attacked by nucleophiles rather than by electrophiles; also, they show poor chemical structure stability when encountering nucleophiles. |
---|