Cargando…

Comparison on the immersion corrosion and electrochemical corrosion resistance of WC–Al(2)O(3) composites and WC–Co cemented carbide in NaCl solution

WC–15 wt% Al(2)O(3) composites were prepared via hot pressing sintering technology. The corrosion behaviors of WC–Al(2)O(3) composites and traditional WC–Co cemented carbide in NaCl solution were studied by immersion corrosion and electrochemical technique. The impedance value of the WC–Al(2)O(3) co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Bin, Dong, Weiwei, Fan, Bowen, Zhu, Shigen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9034211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35480832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1ra03549e
_version_ 1784693065241329664
author Han, Bin
Dong, Weiwei
Fan, Bowen
Zhu, Shigen
author_facet Han, Bin
Dong, Weiwei
Fan, Bowen
Zhu, Shigen
author_sort Han, Bin
collection PubMed
description WC–15 wt% Al(2)O(3) composites were prepared via hot pressing sintering technology. The corrosion behaviors of WC–Al(2)O(3) composites and traditional WC–Co cemented carbide in NaCl solution were studied by immersion corrosion and electrochemical technique. The impedance value of the WC–Al(2)O(3) composite increased more rapidly than WC–Co cemented carbide during the 24 hours, which indicated that WC–Al(2)O(3) composites had a more compact passivation film than WC–Co cemented carbide. The results confirmed that the corrosion resistance of WC–Al(2)O(3) composites was higher than that of WC–Co cemented carbide in NaCl solution. The corrosion mechanisms of WC–Al(2)O(3) composites and WC–Co cemented carbide in NaCl solution were also revealed by SEM, EDS, XPS and Raman. The corrosion products of WC–Al(2)O(3) composites mainly contain WO(3), while for WC–Co cemented carbide they are Co(OH)(2), Co(3)O(4) and WO(3). The different corrosion mechanism of the two materials is attributed to the Al(2)O(3) phase instead of the Co binder, which avoids the galvanic corrosion between the WC phase and the Co binder.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9034211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90342112022-04-26 Comparison on the immersion corrosion and electrochemical corrosion resistance of WC–Al(2)O(3) composites and WC–Co cemented carbide in NaCl solution Han, Bin Dong, Weiwei Fan, Bowen Zhu, Shigen RSC Adv Chemistry WC–15 wt% Al(2)O(3) composites were prepared via hot pressing sintering technology. The corrosion behaviors of WC–Al(2)O(3) composites and traditional WC–Co cemented carbide in NaCl solution were studied by immersion corrosion and electrochemical technique. The impedance value of the WC–Al(2)O(3) composite increased more rapidly than WC–Co cemented carbide during the 24 hours, which indicated that WC–Al(2)O(3) composites had a more compact passivation film than WC–Co cemented carbide. The results confirmed that the corrosion resistance of WC–Al(2)O(3) composites was higher than that of WC–Co cemented carbide in NaCl solution. The corrosion mechanisms of WC–Al(2)O(3) composites and WC–Co cemented carbide in NaCl solution were also revealed by SEM, EDS, XPS and Raman. The corrosion products of WC–Al(2)O(3) composites mainly contain WO(3), while for WC–Co cemented carbide they are Co(OH)(2), Co(3)O(4) and WO(3). The different corrosion mechanism of the two materials is attributed to the Al(2)O(3) phase instead of the Co binder, which avoids the galvanic corrosion between the WC phase and the Co binder. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9034211/ /pubmed/35480832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1ra03549e Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Chemistry
Han, Bin
Dong, Weiwei
Fan, Bowen
Zhu, Shigen
Comparison on the immersion corrosion and electrochemical corrosion resistance of WC–Al(2)O(3) composites and WC–Co cemented carbide in NaCl solution
title Comparison on the immersion corrosion and electrochemical corrosion resistance of WC–Al(2)O(3) composites and WC–Co cemented carbide in NaCl solution
title_full Comparison on the immersion corrosion and electrochemical corrosion resistance of WC–Al(2)O(3) composites and WC–Co cemented carbide in NaCl solution
title_fullStr Comparison on the immersion corrosion and electrochemical corrosion resistance of WC–Al(2)O(3) composites and WC–Co cemented carbide in NaCl solution
title_full_unstemmed Comparison on the immersion corrosion and electrochemical corrosion resistance of WC–Al(2)O(3) composites and WC–Co cemented carbide in NaCl solution
title_short Comparison on the immersion corrosion and electrochemical corrosion resistance of WC–Al(2)O(3) composites and WC–Co cemented carbide in NaCl solution
title_sort comparison on the immersion corrosion and electrochemical corrosion resistance of wc–al(2)o(3) composites and wc–co cemented carbide in nacl solution
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9034211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35480832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1ra03549e
work_keys_str_mv AT hanbin comparisonontheimmersioncorrosionandelectrochemicalcorrosionresistanceofwcal2o3compositesandwccocementedcarbideinnaclsolution
AT dongweiwei comparisonontheimmersioncorrosionandelectrochemicalcorrosionresistanceofwcal2o3compositesandwccocementedcarbideinnaclsolution
AT fanbowen comparisonontheimmersioncorrosionandelectrochemicalcorrosionresistanceofwcal2o3compositesandwccocementedcarbideinnaclsolution
AT zhushigen comparisonontheimmersioncorrosionandelectrochemicalcorrosionresistanceofwcal2o3compositesandwccocementedcarbideinnaclsolution