Cargando…
A comparison between the adductor pollicis muscle and the abductor digiti minimi muscle using electromyography AF-201P in rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: a prospective comparative study
BACKGROUND: The AF-201P, a new electromyography (EMG)-based neuromuscular monitor has been developed recently. The aim of this clinical study was to compare two ulnar nerve innervated muscles: the adductor pollicis (AP) muscle and the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscle during the recovery from rocu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9034586/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35459095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01656-y |
_version_ | 1784693140691615744 |
---|---|
author | Iwasaki, Hajime Sato, Hanae Takagi, Shunichi Kitajima, Osamu Luthe, Sarah Kyuragi Suzuki, Takahiro |
author_facet | Iwasaki, Hajime Sato, Hanae Takagi, Shunichi Kitajima, Osamu Luthe, Sarah Kyuragi Suzuki, Takahiro |
author_sort | Iwasaki, Hajime |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The AF-201P, a new electromyography (EMG)-based neuromuscular monitor has been developed recently. The aim of this clinical study was to compare two ulnar nerve innervated muscles: the adductor pollicis (AP) muscle and the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscle during the recovery from rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block by using EMG AF-201P. METHODS: Twenty patients undergoing surgery with general anesthesia were enrolled in the study. During total intravenous general anesthesia, train-of-four (TOF) and post-tetanic counts (PTC) responses following 0.9 mg/kg rocuronium administration were concurrently monitored at the AP and the ADM muscles with EMG AF-201P on the opposite arms. At the end of the surgery, sugammadex 2 mg/kg was administered when TOF counts of 2 (TOFC2) was observed at both muscles. The primary outcome of the study was time from administration of rocuronium to first appearance of PTC response (first PTC). The secondary outcomes of the study were time from administration of rocuronium to TOF count of 1 (TOFC1), time from first PTC to TOFC1 (PTC-TOF time), time to TOFC2, and time from administration of sugammadex to TOF ratio ≥ 0.9. Agreement between the two muscles was assessed using the Bland–Altman analysis. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included in the analysis. Time to first PTC was significantly faster at the ADM muscle than the AP muscle (24.4 ± 11.4 min vs 32.4 ± 13.1 min, p = 0.006). PTC-TOF time was significantly longer with the ADM muscle than the AP muscle (19.4 ± 7.3 min vs 12.4 ± 10.6 min, p = 0.019). There were no significant differences in time to TOFC2 and sugammadex-facilitated recovery between the two muscles. Bland–Altman analyses showed acceptable ranges of bias and limits of agreement of the two muscles. CONCLUSIONS: The ADM muscle showed a good agreement with the AP muscle during rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block but faster recovery of PTC response when using EMG. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN-CTR (Registration No. UMIN000044904). Registered 19 July 2021 -Retrospectively registered, https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000051290. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9034586 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90345862022-04-24 A comparison between the adductor pollicis muscle and the abductor digiti minimi muscle using electromyography AF-201P in rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: a prospective comparative study Iwasaki, Hajime Sato, Hanae Takagi, Shunichi Kitajima, Osamu Luthe, Sarah Kyuragi Suzuki, Takahiro BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: The AF-201P, a new electromyography (EMG)-based neuromuscular monitor has been developed recently. The aim of this clinical study was to compare two ulnar nerve innervated muscles: the adductor pollicis (AP) muscle and the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscle during the recovery from rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block by using EMG AF-201P. METHODS: Twenty patients undergoing surgery with general anesthesia were enrolled in the study. During total intravenous general anesthesia, train-of-four (TOF) and post-tetanic counts (PTC) responses following 0.9 mg/kg rocuronium administration were concurrently monitored at the AP and the ADM muscles with EMG AF-201P on the opposite arms. At the end of the surgery, sugammadex 2 mg/kg was administered when TOF counts of 2 (TOFC2) was observed at both muscles. The primary outcome of the study was time from administration of rocuronium to first appearance of PTC response (first PTC). The secondary outcomes of the study were time from administration of rocuronium to TOF count of 1 (TOFC1), time from first PTC to TOFC1 (PTC-TOF time), time to TOFC2, and time from administration of sugammadex to TOF ratio ≥ 0.9. Agreement between the two muscles was assessed using the Bland–Altman analysis. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included in the analysis. Time to first PTC was significantly faster at the ADM muscle than the AP muscle (24.4 ± 11.4 min vs 32.4 ± 13.1 min, p = 0.006). PTC-TOF time was significantly longer with the ADM muscle than the AP muscle (19.4 ± 7.3 min vs 12.4 ± 10.6 min, p = 0.019). There were no significant differences in time to TOFC2 and sugammadex-facilitated recovery between the two muscles. Bland–Altman analyses showed acceptable ranges of bias and limits of agreement of the two muscles. CONCLUSIONS: The ADM muscle showed a good agreement with the AP muscle during rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block but faster recovery of PTC response when using EMG. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN-CTR (Registration No. UMIN000044904). Registered 19 July 2021 -Retrospectively registered, https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000051290. BioMed Central 2022-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9034586/ /pubmed/35459095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01656-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Iwasaki, Hajime Sato, Hanae Takagi, Shunichi Kitajima, Osamu Luthe, Sarah Kyuragi Suzuki, Takahiro A comparison between the adductor pollicis muscle and the abductor digiti minimi muscle using electromyography AF-201P in rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: a prospective comparative study |
title | A comparison between the adductor pollicis muscle and the abductor digiti minimi muscle using electromyography AF-201P in rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: a prospective comparative study |
title_full | A comparison between the adductor pollicis muscle and the abductor digiti minimi muscle using electromyography AF-201P in rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: a prospective comparative study |
title_fullStr | A comparison between the adductor pollicis muscle and the abductor digiti minimi muscle using electromyography AF-201P in rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: a prospective comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison between the adductor pollicis muscle and the abductor digiti minimi muscle using electromyography AF-201P in rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: a prospective comparative study |
title_short | A comparison between the adductor pollicis muscle and the abductor digiti minimi muscle using electromyography AF-201P in rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: a prospective comparative study |
title_sort | comparison between the adductor pollicis muscle and the abductor digiti minimi muscle using electromyography af-201p in rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: a prospective comparative study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9034586/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35459095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01656-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iwasakihajime acomparisonbetweentheadductorpollicismuscleandtheabductordigitiminimimuscleusingelectromyographyaf201pinrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockaprospectivecomparativestudy AT satohanae acomparisonbetweentheadductorpollicismuscleandtheabductordigitiminimimuscleusingelectromyographyaf201pinrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockaprospectivecomparativestudy AT takagishunichi acomparisonbetweentheadductorpollicismuscleandtheabductordigitiminimimuscleusingelectromyographyaf201pinrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockaprospectivecomparativestudy AT kitajimaosamu acomparisonbetweentheadductorpollicismuscleandtheabductordigitiminimimuscleusingelectromyographyaf201pinrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockaprospectivecomparativestudy AT luthesarahkyuragi acomparisonbetweentheadductorpollicismuscleandtheabductordigitiminimimuscleusingelectromyographyaf201pinrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockaprospectivecomparativestudy AT suzukitakahiro acomparisonbetweentheadductorpollicismuscleandtheabductordigitiminimimuscleusingelectromyographyaf201pinrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockaprospectivecomparativestudy AT iwasakihajime comparisonbetweentheadductorpollicismuscleandtheabductordigitiminimimuscleusingelectromyographyaf201pinrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockaprospectivecomparativestudy AT satohanae comparisonbetweentheadductorpollicismuscleandtheabductordigitiminimimuscleusingelectromyographyaf201pinrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockaprospectivecomparativestudy AT takagishunichi comparisonbetweentheadductorpollicismuscleandtheabductordigitiminimimuscleusingelectromyographyaf201pinrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockaprospectivecomparativestudy AT kitajimaosamu comparisonbetweentheadductorpollicismuscleandtheabductordigitiminimimuscleusingelectromyographyaf201pinrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockaprospectivecomparativestudy AT luthesarahkyuragi comparisonbetweentheadductorpollicismuscleandtheabductordigitiminimimuscleusingelectromyographyaf201pinrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockaprospectivecomparativestudy AT suzukitakahiro comparisonbetweentheadductorpollicismuscleandtheabductordigitiminimimuscleusingelectromyographyaf201pinrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockaprospectivecomparativestudy |