Cargando…

A comparison between the adductor pollicis muscle and the abductor digiti minimi muscle using electromyography AF-201P in rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: a prospective comparative study

BACKGROUND: The AF-201P, a new electromyography (EMG)-based neuromuscular monitor has been developed recently. The aim of this clinical study was to compare two ulnar nerve innervated muscles: the adductor pollicis (AP) muscle and the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscle during the recovery from rocu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iwasaki, Hajime, Sato, Hanae, Takagi, Shunichi, Kitajima, Osamu, Luthe, Sarah Kyuragi, Suzuki, Takahiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9034586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35459095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01656-y
_version_ 1784693140691615744
author Iwasaki, Hajime
Sato, Hanae
Takagi, Shunichi
Kitajima, Osamu
Luthe, Sarah Kyuragi
Suzuki, Takahiro
author_facet Iwasaki, Hajime
Sato, Hanae
Takagi, Shunichi
Kitajima, Osamu
Luthe, Sarah Kyuragi
Suzuki, Takahiro
author_sort Iwasaki, Hajime
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The AF-201P, a new electromyography (EMG)-based neuromuscular monitor has been developed recently. The aim of this clinical study was to compare two ulnar nerve innervated muscles: the adductor pollicis (AP) muscle and the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscle during the recovery from rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block by using EMG AF-201P. METHODS: Twenty patients undergoing surgery with general anesthesia were enrolled in the study. During total intravenous general anesthesia, train-of-four (TOF) and post-tetanic counts (PTC) responses following 0.9 mg/kg rocuronium administration were concurrently monitored at the AP and the ADM muscles with EMG AF-201P on the opposite arms. At the end of the surgery, sugammadex 2 mg/kg was administered when TOF counts of 2 (TOFC2) was observed at both muscles. The primary outcome of the study was time from administration of rocuronium to first appearance of PTC response (first PTC). The secondary outcomes of the study were time from administration of rocuronium to TOF count of 1 (TOFC1), time from first PTC to TOFC1 (PTC-TOF time), time to TOFC2, and time from administration of sugammadex to TOF ratio ≥ 0.9. Agreement between the two muscles was assessed using the Bland–Altman analysis. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included in the analysis. Time to first PTC was significantly faster at the ADM muscle than the AP muscle (24.4 ± 11.4 min vs 32.4 ± 13.1 min, p = 0.006). PTC-TOF time was significantly longer with the ADM muscle than the AP muscle (19.4 ± 7.3 min vs 12.4 ± 10.6 min, p = 0.019). There were no significant differences in time to TOFC2 and sugammadex-facilitated recovery between the two muscles. Bland–Altman analyses showed acceptable ranges of bias and limits of agreement of the two muscles. CONCLUSIONS: The ADM muscle showed a good agreement with the AP muscle during rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block but faster recovery of PTC response when using EMG. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN-CTR (Registration No. UMIN000044904). Registered 19 July 2021 -Retrospectively registered, https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000051290.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9034586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90345862022-04-24 A comparison between the adductor pollicis muscle and the abductor digiti minimi muscle using electromyography AF-201P in rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: a prospective comparative study Iwasaki, Hajime Sato, Hanae Takagi, Shunichi Kitajima, Osamu Luthe, Sarah Kyuragi Suzuki, Takahiro BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: The AF-201P, a new electromyography (EMG)-based neuromuscular monitor has been developed recently. The aim of this clinical study was to compare two ulnar nerve innervated muscles: the adductor pollicis (AP) muscle and the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscle during the recovery from rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block by using EMG AF-201P. METHODS: Twenty patients undergoing surgery with general anesthesia were enrolled in the study. During total intravenous general anesthesia, train-of-four (TOF) and post-tetanic counts (PTC) responses following 0.9 mg/kg rocuronium administration were concurrently monitored at the AP and the ADM muscles with EMG AF-201P on the opposite arms. At the end of the surgery, sugammadex 2 mg/kg was administered when TOF counts of 2 (TOFC2) was observed at both muscles. The primary outcome of the study was time from administration of rocuronium to first appearance of PTC response (first PTC). The secondary outcomes of the study were time from administration of rocuronium to TOF count of 1 (TOFC1), time from first PTC to TOFC1 (PTC-TOF time), time to TOFC2, and time from administration of sugammadex to TOF ratio ≥ 0.9. Agreement between the two muscles was assessed using the Bland–Altman analysis. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included in the analysis. Time to first PTC was significantly faster at the ADM muscle than the AP muscle (24.4 ± 11.4 min vs 32.4 ± 13.1 min, p = 0.006). PTC-TOF time was significantly longer with the ADM muscle than the AP muscle (19.4 ± 7.3 min vs 12.4 ± 10.6 min, p = 0.019). There were no significant differences in time to TOFC2 and sugammadex-facilitated recovery between the two muscles. Bland–Altman analyses showed acceptable ranges of bias and limits of agreement of the two muscles. CONCLUSIONS: The ADM muscle showed a good agreement with the AP muscle during rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block but faster recovery of PTC response when using EMG. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN-CTR (Registration No. UMIN000044904). Registered 19 July 2021 -Retrospectively registered, https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000051290. BioMed Central 2022-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9034586/ /pubmed/35459095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01656-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Iwasaki, Hajime
Sato, Hanae
Takagi, Shunichi
Kitajima, Osamu
Luthe, Sarah Kyuragi
Suzuki, Takahiro
A comparison between the adductor pollicis muscle and the abductor digiti minimi muscle using electromyography AF-201P in rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: a prospective comparative study
title A comparison between the adductor pollicis muscle and the abductor digiti minimi muscle using electromyography AF-201P in rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: a prospective comparative study
title_full A comparison between the adductor pollicis muscle and the abductor digiti minimi muscle using electromyography AF-201P in rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: a prospective comparative study
title_fullStr A comparison between the adductor pollicis muscle and the abductor digiti minimi muscle using electromyography AF-201P in rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: a prospective comparative study
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between the adductor pollicis muscle and the abductor digiti minimi muscle using electromyography AF-201P in rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: a prospective comparative study
title_short A comparison between the adductor pollicis muscle and the abductor digiti minimi muscle using electromyography AF-201P in rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: a prospective comparative study
title_sort comparison between the adductor pollicis muscle and the abductor digiti minimi muscle using electromyography af-201p in rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: a prospective comparative study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9034586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35459095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01656-y
work_keys_str_mv AT iwasakihajime acomparisonbetweentheadductorpollicismuscleandtheabductordigitiminimimuscleusingelectromyographyaf201pinrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT satohanae acomparisonbetweentheadductorpollicismuscleandtheabductordigitiminimimuscleusingelectromyographyaf201pinrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT takagishunichi acomparisonbetweentheadductorpollicismuscleandtheabductordigitiminimimuscleusingelectromyographyaf201pinrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT kitajimaosamu acomparisonbetweentheadductorpollicismuscleandtheabductordigitiminimimuscleusingelectromyographyaf201pinrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT luthesarahkyuragi acomparisonbetweentheadductorpollicismuscleandtheabductordigitiminimimuscleusingelectromyographyaf201pinrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT suzukitakahiro acomparisonbetweentheadductorpollicismuscleandtheabductordigitiminimimuscleusingelectromyographyaf201pinrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT iwasakihajime comparisonbetweentheadductorpollicismuscleandtheabductordigitiminimimuscleusingelectromyographyaf201pinrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT satohanae comparisonbetweentheadductorpollicismuscleandtheabductordigitiminimimuscleusingelectromyographyaf201pinrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT takagishunichi comparisonbetweentheadductorpollicismuscleandtheabductordigitiminimimuscleusingelectromyographyaf201pinrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT kitajimaosamu comparisonbetweentheadductorpollicismuscleandtheabductordigitiminimimuscleusingelectromyographyaf201pinrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT luthesarahkyuragi comparisonbetweentheadductorpollicismuscleandtheabductordigitiminimimuscleusingelectromyographyaf201pinrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT suzukitakahiro comparisonbetweentheadductorpollicismuscleandtheabductordigitiminimimuscleusingelectromyographyaf201pinrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockaprospectivecomparativestudy