Cargando…
New horizons in evidence-based care for older people: individual participant data meta-analysis
Evidence-based decisions on clinical and cost-effectiveness of interventions are ideally informed by meta-analyses of intervention trial data. However, when undertaken, such meta-analyses in ageing research have typically been conducted using standard methods whereby summary (aggregate) data are ext...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9034697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35460409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afac090 |
_version_ | 1784693165714833408 |
---|---|
author | Clegg, Andrew Bandeen-Roche, Karen Farrin, Amanda Forster, Anne Gill, Thomas M Gladman, John Kerse, Ngaire Lindley, Richard McManus, Richard J Melis, Rene Mujica-Mota, Ruben Raina, Parminder Rockwood, Kenneth Teh, Ruth van der Windt, Danielle Witham, Miles |
author_facet | Clegg, Andrew Bandeen-Roche, Karen Farrin, Amanda Forster, Anne Gill, Thomas M Gladman, John Kerse, Ngaire Lindley, Richard McManus, Richard J Melis, Rene Mujica-Mota, Ruben Raina, Parminder Rockwood, Kenneth Teh, Ruth van der Windt, Danielle Witham, Miles |
author_sort | Clegg, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | Evidence-based decisions on clinical and cost-effectiveness of interventions are ideally informed by meta-analyses of intervention trial data. However, when undertaken, such meta-analyses in ageing research have typically been conducted using standard methods whereby summary (aggregate) data are extracted from published trial reports. Although meta-analysis of aggregate data can provide useful insights into the average effect of interventions within a selected trial population, it has limitations regarding robust conclusions on which subgroups of people stand to gain the greatest benefit from an intervention or are at risk of experiencing harm. Future evidence synthesis using individual participant data from ageing research trials for meta-analysis could transform understanding of the effectiveness of interventions for older people, supporting evidence-based and sustainable commissioning. A major advantage of individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) is that it enables examination of characteristics that predict treatment effects, such as frailty, disability, cognitive impairment, ethnicity, gender and other wider determinants of health. Key challenges of IPDMA relate to the complexity and resources needed for obtaining, managing and preparing datasets, requiring a meticulous approach involving experienced researchers, frequently with expertise in designing and analysing clinical trials. In anticipation of future IPDMA work in ageing research, we are establishing an international Ageing Research Trialists collective, to bring together trialists with a common focus on transforming care for older people as a shared ambition across nations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9034697 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90346972022-04-25 New horizons in evidence-based care for older people: individual participant data meta-analysis Clegg, Andrew Bandeen-Roche, Karen Farrin, Amanda Forster, Anne Gill, Thomas M Gladman, John Kerse, Ngaire Lindley, Richard McManus, Richard J Melis, Rene Mujica-Mota, Ruben Raina, Parminder Rockwood, Kenneth Teh, Ruth van der Windt, Danielle Witham, Miles Age Ageing New Horizons Evidence-based decisions on clinical and cost-effectiveness of interventions are ideally informed by meta-analyses of intervention trial data. However, when undertaken, such meta-analyses in ageing research have typically been conducted using standard methods whereby summary (aggregate) data are extracted from published trial reports. Although meta-analysis of aggregate data can provide useful insights into the average effect of interventions within a selected trial population, it has limitations regarding robust conclusions on which subgroups of people stand to gain the greatest benefit from an intervention or are at risk of experiencing harm. Future evidence synthesis using individual participant data from ageing research trials for meta-analysis could transform understanding of the effectiveness of interventions for older people, supporting evidence-based and sustainable commissioning. A major advantage of individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) is that it enables examination of characteristics that predict treatment effects, such as frailty, disability, cognitive impairment, ethnicity, gender and other wider determinants of health. Key challenges of IPDMA relate to the complexity and resources needed for obtaining, managing and preparing datasets, requiring a meticulous approach involving experienced researchers, frequently with expertise in designing and analysing clinical trials. In anticipation of future IPDMA work in ageing research, we are establishing an international Ageing Research Trialists collective, to bring together trialists with a common focus on transforming care for older people as a shared ambition across nations. Oxford University Press 2022-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9034697/ /pubmed/35460409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afac090 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | New Horizons Clegg, Andrew Bandeen-Roche, Karen Farrin, Amanda Forster, Anne Gill, Thomas M Gladman, John Kerse, Ngaire Lindley, Richard McManus, Richard J Melis, Rene Mujica-Mota, Ruben Raina, Parminder Rockwood, Kenneth Teh, Ruth van der Windt, Danielle Witham, Miles New horizons in evidence-based care for older people: individual participant data meta-analysis |
title | New horizons in evidence-based care for older people: individual participant data meta-analysis |
title_full | New horizons in evidence-based care for older people: individual participant data meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | New horizons in evidence-based care for older people: individual participant data meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | New horizons in evidence-based care for older people: individual participant data meta-analysis |
title_short | New horizons in evidence-based care for older people: individual participant data meta-analysis |
title_sort | new horizons in evidence-based care for older people: individual participant data meta-analysis |
topic | New Horizons |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9034697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35460409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afac090 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cleggandrew newhorizonsinevidencebasedcareforolderpeopleindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT bandeenrochekaren newhorizonsinevidencebasedcareforolderpeopleindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT farrinamanda newhorizonsinevidencebasedcareforolderpeopleindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT forsteranne newhorizonsinevidencebasedcareforolderpeopleindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT gillthomasm newhorizonsinevidencebasedcareforolderpeopleindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT gladmanjohn newhorizonsinevidencebasedcareforolderpeopleindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT kersengaire newhorizonsinevidencebasedcareforolderpeopleindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT lindleyrichard newhorizonsinevidencebasedcareforolderpeopleindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT mcmanusrichardj newhorizonsinevidencebasedcareforolderpeopleindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT melisrene newhorizonsinevidencebasedcareforolderpeopleindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT mujicamotaruben newhorizonsinevidencebasedcareforolderpeopleindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT rainaparminder newhorizonsinevidencebasedcareforolderpeopleindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT rockwoodkenneth newhorizonsinevidencebasedcareforolderpeopleindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT tehruth newhorizonsinevidencebasedcareforolderpeopleindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT vanderwindtdanielle newhorizonsinevidencebasedcareforolderpeopleindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT withammiles newhorizonsinevidencebasedcareforolderpeopleindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis |