Cargando…
Progressive Retinal Degeneration Increases Cortical Response Latency of Light Stimulation but Not of Electric Stimulation
PURPOSE: The brain is known to change functionally and structurally in response to blindness, but less is known about the effects of restoration of cortical input on brain function. Here, we present a preliminary study to observe alterations in visual and electrical evoked cortical potentials as a f...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9034728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35446408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.4.19 |
_version_ | 1784693173284503552 |
---|---|
author | Koo, Beomseo Weiland, James D. |
author_facet | Koo, Beomseo Weiland, James D. |
author_sort | Koo, Beomseo |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The brain is known to change functionally and structurally in response to blindness, but less is known about the effects of restoration of cortical input on brain function. Here, we present a preliminary study to observe alterations in visual and electrical evoked cortical potentials as a function of age in a clinically relevant animal model of retinitis pigmentosa. METHODS: We recorded brain potentials elicited by light (visual evoked potentials [VEPs]) or corneal electrical stimulation (electrical evoked response [EER]) in retinal degenerate animal model LE-P23H-1. We used a linear mixed model to examine the effects of age on latency and amplitude of VEP and EER age groups P120, P180, and P360. RESULTS: VEP N1, P1, and N2 latency and amplitude were analyzed across animal age. For 1 Hz VEP, N1 latency increased significantly with animal age (slope = 0.053 ± 0.020 ms/day, P < 0.01). For 10 Hz VEP, N1, P1, and N2 latency increased significantly with animal age (slope = 0.104 ± 0.011, 0.135 ± 0.011, 0.087 ± 0.023 ms/day, and P < 0.001 for all VEP peaks). Conversely, EER latency did not change with age. Signal amplitude of VEP or EER did not change with age. CONCLUSIONS: Cortical potentials evoked by electrical stimulation of the retina do not diminish in spite of continued retinal degeneration in P23H rats. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that retinal bioelectronic treatments of retinitis pigmentosa will activate cortex consistently despite variations in outer retinal degeneration. Clinical studies of retinal stimulation should consider varying retinitis pigmentosa genotypes as part of the experimental design. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9034728 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90347282022-04-24 Progressive Retinal Degeneration Increases Cortical Response Latency of Light Stimulation but Not of Electric Stimulation Koo, Beomseo Weiland, James D. Transl Vis Sci Technol Article PURPOSE: The brain is known to change functionally and structurally in response to blindness, but less is known about the effects of restoration of cortical input on brain function. Here, we present a preliminary study to observe alterations in visual and electrical evoked cortical potentials as a function of age in a clinically relevant animal model of retinitis pigmentosa. METHODS: We recorded brain potentials elicited by light (visual evoked potentials [VEPs]) or corneal electrical stimulation (electrical evoked response [EER]) in retinal degenerate animal model LE-P23H-1. We used a linear mixed model to examine the effects of age on latency and amplitude of VEP and EER age groups P120, P180, and P360. RESULTS: VEP N1, P1, and N2 latency and amplitude were analyzed across animal age. For 1 Hz VEP, N1 latency increased significantly with animal age (slope = 0.053 ± 0.020 ms/day, P < 0.01). For 10 Hz VEP, N1, P1, and N2 latency increased significantly with animal age (slope = 0.104 ± 0.011, 0.135 ± 0.011, 0.087 ± 0.023 ms/day, and P < 0.001 for all VEP peaks). Conversely, EER latency did not change with age. Signal amplitude of VEP or EER did not change with age. CONCLUSIONS: Cortical potentials evoked by electrical stimulation of the retina do not diminish in spite of continued retinal degeneration in P23H rats. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that retinal bioelectronic treatments of retinitis pigmentosa will activate cortex consistently despite variations in outer retinal degeneration. Clinical studies of retinal stimulation should consider varying retinitis pigmentosa genotypes as part of the experimental design. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9034728/ /pubmed/35446408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.4.19 Text en Copyright 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Article Koo, Beomseo Weiland, James D. Progressive Retinal Degeneration Increases Cortical Response Latency of Light Stimulation but Not of Electric Stimulation |
title | Progressive Retinal Degeneration Increases Cortical Response Latency of Light Stimulation but Not of Electric Stimulation |
title_full | Progressive Retinal Degeneration Increases Cortical Response Latency of Light Stimulation but Not of Electric Stimulation |
title_fullStr | Progressive Retinal Degeneration Increases Cortical Response Latency of Light Stimulation but Not of Electric Stimulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Progressive Retinal Degeneration Increases Cortical Response Latency of Light Stimulation but Not of Electric Stimulation |
title_short | Progressive Retinal Degeneration Increases Cortical Response Latency of Light Stimulation but Not of Electric Stimulation |
title_sort | progressive retinal degeneration increases cortical response latency of light stimulation but not of electric stimulation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9034728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35446408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.4.19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koobeomseo progressiveretinaldegenerationincreasescorticalresponselatencyoflightstimulationbutnotofelectricstimulation AT weilandjamesd progressiveretinaldegenerationincreasescorticalresponselatencyoflightstimulationbutnotofelectricstimulation |