Cargando…
The Listening Zone of Human Electrocorticographic Field Potential Recordings
Intracranial electroencephalographic (icEEG) recordings provide invaluable insights into neural dynamics in humans because of their unmatched spatiotemporal resolution. Yet, such recordings reflect the combined activity of multiple underlying generators, confounding the ability to resolve spatially...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society for Neuroscience
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9034754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35410871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0492-21.2022 |
_version_ | 1784693178516897792 |
---|---|
author | McCarty, Meredith J. Woolnough, Oscar Mosher, John C. Seymour, John Tandon, Nitin |
author_facet | McCarty, Meredith J. Woolnough, Oscar Mosher, John C. Seymour, John Tandon, Nitin |
author_sort | McCarty, Meredith J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Intracranial electroencephalographic (icEEG) recordings provide invaluable insights into neural dynamics in humans because of their unmatched spatiotemporal resolution. Yet, such recordings reflect the combined activity of multiple underlying generators, confounding the ability to resolve spatially distinct neural sources. To empirically quantify the listening zone of icEEG recordings, we computed correlations between signals as a function of distance (full width at half maximum; FWHM) between 8752 recording sites in 71 patients (33 female) implanted with either subdural electrodes (SDEs), stereo-encephalography electrodes (sEEG), or high-density sEEG electrodes. As expected, for both SDEs and sEEGs, higher frequency signals exhibited a sharper fall off relative to lower frequency signals. For broadband high γ (BHG) activity, the mean FWHM of SDEs (6.6 ± 2.5 mm) and sEEGs in gray matter (7.14 ± 1.7 mm) was not significantly different; however, FWHM for low frequencies recorded by sEEGs was 2.45 mm smaller than SDEs. White matter sEEGs showed much lower power for frequencies 17–200 Hz (q < 0.01) and a much broader decay (11.3 ± 3.2 mm) than gray matter electrodes (7.14 ± 1.7 mm). The use of a bipolar referencing scheme significantly lowered FWHM for sEEGs, relative to a white matter reference or a common average reference (CAR). These results outline the influence of array design, spectral bands, and referencing schema on local field potential recordings and source localization in icEEG recordings in humans. The metrics we derive have immediate relevance to the analysis and interpretation of both cognitive and epileptic data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9034754 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Society for Neuroscience |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90347542022-04-25 The Listening Zone of Human Electrocorticographic Field Potential Recordings McCarty, Meredith J. Woolnough, Oscar Mosher, John C. Seymour, John Tandon, Nitin eNeuro Research Article: Methods/New Tools Intracranial electroencephalographic (icEEG) recordings provide invaluable insights into neural dynamics in humans because of their unmatched spatiotemporal resolution. Yet, such recordings reflect the combined activity of multiple underlying generators, confounding the ability to resolve spatially distinct neural sources. To empirically quantify the listening zone of icEEG recordings, we computed correlations between signals as a function of distance (full width at half maximum; FWHM) between 8752 recording sites in 71 patients (33 female) implanted with either subdural electrodes (SDEs), stereo-encephalography electrodes (sEEG), or high-density sEEG electrodes. As expected, for both SDEs and sEEGs, higher frequency signals exhibited a sharper fall off relative to lower frequency signals. For broadband high γ (BHG) activity, the mean FWHM of SDEs (6.6 ± 2.5 mm) and sEEGs in gray matter (7.14 ± 1.7 mm) was not significantly different; however, FWHM for low frequencies recorded by sEEGs was 2.45 mm smaller than SDEs. White matter sEEGs showed much lower power for frequencies 17–200 Hz (q < 0.01) and a much broader decay (11.3 ± 3.2 mm) than gray matter electrodes (7.14 ± 1.7 mm). The use of a bipolar referencing scheme significantly lowered FWHM for sEEGs, relative to a white matter reference or a common average reference (CAR). These results outline the influence of array design, spectral bands, and referencing schema on local field potential recordings and source localization in icEEG recordings in humans. The metrics we derive have immediate relevance to the analysis and interpretation of both cognitive and epileptic data. Society for Neuroscience 2022-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9034754/ /pubmed/35410871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0492-21.2022 Text en Copyright © 2022 McCarty et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Research Article: Methods/New Tools McCarty, Meredith J. Woolnough, Oscar Mosher, John C. Seymour, John Tandon, Nitin The Listening Zone of Human Electrocorticographic Field Potential Recordings |
title | The Listening Zone of Human Electrocorticographic Field Potential Recordings |
title_full | The Listening Zone of Human Electrocorticographic Field Potential Recordings |
title_fullStr | The Listening Zone of Human Electrocorticographic Field Potential Recordings |
title_full_unstemmed | The Listening Zone of Human Electrocorticographic Field Potential Recordings |
title_short | The Listening Zone of Human Electrocorticographic Field Potential Recordings |
title_sort | listening zone of human electrocorticographic field potential recordings |
topic | Research Article: Methods/New Tools |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9034754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35410871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0492-21.2022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mccartymeredithj thelisteningzoneofhumanelectrocorticographicfieldpotentialrecordings AT woolnoughoscar thelisteningzoneofhumanelectrocorticographicfieldpotentialrecordings AT mosherjohnc thelisteningzoneofhumanelectrocorticographicfieldpotentialrecordings AT seymourjohn thelisteningzoneofhumanelectrocorticographicfieldpotentialrecordings AT tandonnitin thelisteningzoneofhumanelectrocorticographicfieldpotentialrecordings AT mccartymeredithj listeningzoneofhumanelectrocorticographicfieldpotentialrecordings AT woolnoughoscar listeningzoneofhumanelectrocorticographicfieldpotentialrecordings AT mosherjohnc listeningzoneofhumanelectrocorticographicfieldpotentialrecordings AT seymourjohn listeningzoneofhumanelectrocorticographicfieldpotentialrecordings AT tandonnitin listeningzoneofhumanelectrocorticographicfieldpotentialrecordings |