Cargando…

The Listening Zone of Human Electrocorticographic Field Potential Recordings

Intracranial electroencephalographic (icEEG) recordings provide invaluable insights into neural dynamics in humans because of their unmatched spatiotemporal resolution. Yet, such recordings reflect the combined activity of multiple underlying generators, confounding the ability to resolve spatially...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCarty, Meredith J., Woolnough, Oscar, Mosher, John C., Seymour, John, Tandon, Nitin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society for Neuroscience 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9034754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35410871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0492-21.2022
_version_ 1784693178516897792
author McCarty, Meredith J.
Woolnough, Oscar
Mosher, John C.
Seymour, John
Tandon, Nitin
author_facet McCarty, Meredith J.
Woolnough, Oscar
Mosher, John C.
Seymour, John
Tandon, Nitin
author_sort McCarty, Meredith J.
collection PubMed
description Intracranial electroencephalographic (icEEG) recordings provide invaluable insights into neural dynamics in humans because of their unmatched spatiotemporal resolution. Yet, such recordings reflect the combined activity of multiple underlying generators, confounding the ability to resolve spatially distinct neural sources. To empirically quantify the listening zone of icEEG recordings, we computed correlations between signals as a function of distance (full width at half maximum; FWHM) between 8752 recording sites in 71 patients (33 female) implanted with either subdural electrodes (SDEs), stereo-encephalography electrodes (sEEG), or high-density sEEG electrodes. As expected, for both SDEs and sEEGs, higher frequency signals exhibited a sharper fall off relative to lower frequency signals. For broadband high γ (BHG) activity, the mean FWHM of SDEs (6.6 ± 2.5 mm) and sEEGs in gray matter (7.14 ± 1.7 mm) was not significantly different; however, FWHM for low frequencies recorded by sEEGs was 2.45 mm smaller than SDEs. White matter sEEGs showed much lower power for frequencies 17–200 Hz (q < 0.01) and a much broader decay (11.3 ± 3.2 mm) than gray matter electrodes (7.14 ± 1.7 mm). The use of a bipolar referencing scheme significantly lowered FWHM for sEEGs, relative to a white matter reference or a common average reference (CAR). These results outline the influence of array design, spectral bands, and referencing schema on local field potential recordings and source localization in icEEG recordings in humans. The metrics we derive have immediate relevance to the analysis and interpretation of both cognitive and epileptic data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9034754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Society for Neuroscience
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90347542022-04-25 The Listening Zone of Human Electrocorticographic Field Potential Recordings McCarty, Meredith J. Woolnough, Oscar Mosher, John C. Seymour, John Tandon, Nitin eNeuro Research Article: Methods/New Tools Intracranial electroencephalographic (icEEG) recordings provide invaluable insights into neural dynamics in humans because of their unmatched spatiotemporal resolution. Yet, such recordings reflect the combined activity of multiple underlying generators, confounding the ability to resolve spatially distinct neural sources. To empirically quantify the listening zone of icEEG recordings, we computed correlations between signals as a function of distance (full width at half maximum; FWHM) between 8752 recording sites in 71 patients (33 female) implanted with either subdural electrodes (SDEs), stereo-encephalography electrodes (sEEG), or high-density sEEG electrodes. As expected, for both SDEs and sEEGs, higher frequency signals exhibited a sharper fall off relative to lower frequency signals. For broadband high γ (BHG) activity, the mean FWHM of SDEs (6.6 ± 2.5 mm) and sEEGs in gray matter (7.14 ± 1.7 mm) was not significantly different; however, FWHM for low frequencies recorded by sEEGs was 2.45 mm smaller than SDEs. White matter sEEGs showed much lower power for frequencies 17–200 Hz (q < 0.01) and a much broader decay (11.3 ± 3.2 mm) than gray matter electrodes (7.14 ± 1.7 mm). The use of a bipolar referencing scheme significantly lowered FWHM for sEEGs, relative to a white matter reference or a common average reference (CAR). These results outline the influence of array design, spectral bands, and referencing schema on local field potential recordings and source localization in icEEG recordings in humans. The metrics we derive have immediate relevance to the analysis and interpretation of both cognitive and epileptic data. Society for Neuroscience 2022-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9034754/ /pubmed/35410871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0492-21.2022 Text en Copyright © 2022 McCarty et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Research Article: Methods/New Tools
McCarty, Meredith J.
Woolnough, Oscar
Mosher, John C.
Seymour, John
Tandon, Nitin
The Listening Zone of Human Electrocorticographic Field Potential Recordings
title The Listening Zone of Human Electrocorticographic Field Potential Recordings
title_full The Listening Zone of Human Electrocorticographic Field Potential Recordings
title_fullStr The Listening Zone of Human Electrocorticographic Field Potential Recordings
title_full_unstemmed The Listening Zone of Human Electrocorticographic Field Potential Recordings
title_short The Listening Zone of Human Electrocorticographic Field Potential Recordings
title_sort listening zone of human electrocorticographic field potential recordings
topic Research Article: Methods/New Tools
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9034754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35410871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0492-21.2022
work_keys_str_mv AT mccartymeredithj thelisteningzoneofhumanelectrocorticographicfieldpotentialrecordings
AT woolnoughoscar thelisteningzoneofhumanelectrocorticographicfieldpotentialrecordings
AT mosherjohnc thelisteningzoneofhumanelectrocorticographicfieldpotentialrecordings
AT seymourjohn thelisteningzoneofhumanelectrocorticographicfieldpotentialrecordings
AT tandonnitin thelisteningzoneofhumanelectrocorticographicfieldpotentialrecordings
AT mccartymeredithj listeningzoneofhumanelectrocorticographicfieldpotentialrecordings
AT woolnoughoscar listeningzoneofhumanelectrocorticographicfieldpotentialrecordings
AT mosherjohnc listeningzoneofhumanelectrocorticographicfieldpotentialrecordings
AT seymourjohn listeningzoneofhumanelectrocorticographicfieldpotentialrecordings
AT tandonnitin listeningzoneofhumanelectrocorticographicfieldpotentialrecordings