Cargando…

Effects of Different Intervention Methods on Intestinal Cleanliness in Children Undergoing Colonoscopy

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effects of different intervention methods on intestinal cleanliness in children undergoing colonoscopy. METHODS: 61 children who underwent colonoscopy in our hospital from May 2020 to May 2021 were randomly divided into group A (n = 21), group B (n = 30), and group C (n = 1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Yirong, Xiao, Yuan, Zhang, Li, Lv, Jiajia, Huang, Qiyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9034936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35469232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1898610
_version_ 1784693209251708928
author Yang, Yirong
Xiao, Yuan
Zhang, Li
Lv, Jiajia
Huang, Qiyun
author_facet Yang, Yirong
Xiao, Yuan
Zhang, Li
Lv, Jiajia
Huang, Qiyun
author_sort Yang, Yirong
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To explore the effects of different intervention methods on intestinal cleanliness in children undergoing colonoscopy. METHODS: 61 children who underwent colonoscopy in our hospital from May 2020 to May 2021 were randomly divided into group A (n = 21), group B (n = 30), and group C (n = 10). The children in the three groups were intervened in different ways before the colonoscopy. Group A received a long-handled Kaiselu +1 cathartic intervention, while group B received a long-handled Kaiselu +2 cathartic intervention, and group C received an enema plus one cathartic intervention. The patients in the three groups were given the same diet before the examination until the examination was completed. The time-related indexes, cleanliness, adverse reactions, tolerance, and adaptability of the three groups under different dietary interventions and cleaning methods were evaluated. RESULTS: The first defecation time in group C was lower than that in group A and group B, the hospital stay was longer than that in group A and group B (p > 0.05), and the colonoscopy time in group C was shorter than that in group A and group B (p < 0.05). The BBPS score of group C was (2.10 ± 0.32), which was significantly higher than that of group A (1.16 ± 0.19) and group B (1.77 ± 0.18) (p < 0.05). The BBPS scores of children with liquid food in the three groups were significantly higher than those of common food, and the BBPS scores of liquid food and common food in group C were significantly higher than those in group A and group B (p < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in group C was 20.00%, which was significantly lower than 33.33% in group A and 23.33% in group B (p < 0.05). The proportion of grade I in group C was 50.00%, which was significantly higher than 38.10% in group A and 43.33% in group B (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Children undergoing colonoscopy take preintestinal preparation under different diets and intervention methods. The cleanliness of liquid food and enema + one-time laxative one day before colonoscopy is the best, which can significantly reduce adverse reactions and increase the acceptability and adaptability of children. It is worthy of clinical application.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9034936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90349362022-04-24 Effects of Different Intervention Methods on Intestinal Cleanliness in Children Undergoing Colonoscopy Yang, Yirong Xiao, Yuan Zhang, Li Lv, Jiajia Huang, Qiyun J Healthc Eng Research Article OBJECTIVE: To explore the effects of different intervention methods on intestinal cleanliness in children undergoing colonoscopy. METHODS: 61 children who underwent colonoscopy in our hospital from May 2020 to May 2021 were randomly divided into group A (n = 21), group B (n = 30), and group C (n = 10). The children in the three groups were intervened in different ways before the colonoscopy. Group A received a long-handled Kaiselu +1 cathartic intervention, while group B received a long-handled Kaiselu +2 cathartic intervention, and group C received an enema plus one cathartic intervention. The patients in the three groups were given the same diet before the examination until the examination was completed. The time-related indexes, cleanliness, adverse reactions, tolerance, and adaptability of the three groups under different dietary interventions and cleaning methods were evaluated. RESULTS: The first defecation time in group C was lower than that in group A and group B, the hospital stay was longer than that in group A and group B (p > 0.05), and the colonoscopy time in group C was shorter than that in group A and group B (p < 0.05). The BBPS score of group C was (2.10 ± 0.32), which was significantly higher than that of group A (1.16 ± 0.19) and group B (1.77 ± 0.18) (p < 0.05). The BBPS scores of children with liquid food in the three groups were significantly higher than those of common food, and the BBPS scores of liquid food and common food in group C were significantly higher than those in group A and group B (p < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in group C was 20.00%, which was significantly lower than 33.33% in group A and 23.33% in group B (p < 0.05). The proportion of grade I in group C was 50.00%, which was significantly higher than 38.10% in group A and 43.33% in group B (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Children undergoing colonoscopy take preintestinal preparation under different diets and intervention methods. The cleanliness of liquid food and enema + one-time laxative one day before colonoscopy is the best, which can significantly reduce adverse reactions and increase the acceptability and adaptability of children. It is worthy of clinical application. Hindawi 2022-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9034936/ /pubmed/35469232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1898610 Text en Copyright © 2022 Yirong Yang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yang, Yirong
Xiao, Yuan
Zhang, Li
Lv, Jiajia
Huang, Qiyun
Effects of Different Intervention Methods on Intestinal Cleanliness in Children Undergoing Colonoscopy
title Effects of Different Intervention Methods on Intestinal Cleanliness in Children Undergoing Colonoscopy
title_full Effects of Different Intervention Methods on Intestinal Cleanliness in Children Undergoing Colonoscopy
title_fullStr Effects of Different Intervention Methods on Intestinal Cleanliness in Children Undergoing Colonoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Different Intervention Methods on Intestinal Cleanliness in Children Undergoing Colonoscopy
title_short Effects of Different Intervention Methods on Intestinal Cleanliness in Children Undergoing Colonoscopy
title_sort effects of different intervention methods on intestinal cleanliness in children undergoing colonoscopy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9034936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35469232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1898610
work_keys_str_mv AT yangyirong effectsofdifferentinterventionmethodsonintestinalcleanlinessinchildrenundergoingcolonoscopy
AT xiaoyuan effectsofdifferentinterventionmethodsonintestinalcleanlinessinchildrenundergoingcolonoscopy
AT zhangli effectsofdifferentinterventionmethodsonintestinalcleanlinessinchildrenundergoingcolonoscopy
AT lvjiajia effectsofdifferentinterventionmethodsonintestinalcleanlinessinchildrenundergoingcolonoscopy
AT huangqiyun effectsofdifferentinterventionmethodsonintestinalcleanlinessinchildrenundergoingcolonoscopy