Cargando…

Determining the frequency and level of task-sharing for hypertension management in LMICs: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) bear a disproportionately higher burden of Cardiovascular Disease (CVD). Team-based care approach adds capacity to improve blood pressure (BP) control. This updated review aimed to test team-based care efficacy at different levels of hypertension...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ogungbe, Oluwabunmi, Cazabon, Danielle, Ajenikoko, Adefunke, Jeemon, Panniyammakal, Moran, Andrew E., Commodore-Mensah, Yvonne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9035722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35480075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101388
_version_ 1784693359653158912
author Ogungbe, Oluwabunmi
Cazabon, Danielle
Ajenikoko, Adefunke
Jeemon, Panniyammakal
Moran, Andrew E.
Commodore-Mensah, Yvonne
author_facet Ogungbe, Oluwabunmi
Cazabon, Danielle
Ajenikoko, Adefunke
Jeemon, Panniyammakal
Moran, Andrew E.
Commodore-Mensah, Yvonne
author_sort Ogungbe, Oluwabunmi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) bear a disproportionately higher burden of Cardiovascular Disease (CVD). Team-based care approach adds capacity to improve blood pressure (BP) control. This updated review aimed to test team-based care efficacy at different levels of hypertension team-based care complexity. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL for newer articles on task-sharing interventions to manage hypertension in LMICs. Levels of tasks complexity performed by healthcare workers added to the clinical team in hypertension control programs were categorized as administrative tasks (level 1), basic clinical tasks (level 2), and/or advanced clinical tasks (level 3). Meta-analysis using an inverse variance weighted random-effects model summarized trial-based evidence on the efficacy of team-based care on BP control, compared with usual care. FINDINGS: Forty-three RCT articles were included in the meta-analysis: 31 studies from the previous systematic review, 12 articles from the updated search. The pooled mean effect for team-based care was a -4.6 mm Hg (95% CI: -5.8, -3.4, I(2) = 80.2%) decrease in systolic BP compared with usual care. We found similar comparative reduction among different levels of team-based care complexity, i.e., administrative and basic clinical tasks (-4.7 mm Hg, 95% CI: -6.8, -2.2; I(2) = 79.8%); and advanced clinical tasks (-4.5 mmHg, 95%CI: -6.1, -3.3; I(2) = 81%). Systolic BP was reduced most by team-based care involving pharmacists (-7.3 mm Hg, 95% CI: -9.2, -5.4; I(2) = 67.2%); followed by nurses (-5.1 mm Hg, 95% CI: -8.0, -2.2; I(2) = 72.7%), dieticians (-4.7 mmHg, 95%CI: -7.1, -2.3; I(2) = 0.0%), then community health workers (-3.3 mm Hg, 95% CI: -4.8, -1.8; I(2) = 77.3%). INTERPRETATION: Overall, team-based hypertension care interventions consistently contributed to lower systolic BP compared to usual care; the effect size varies by the clinical training of the healthcare team members. FUNDING: Resolve To Save Lives (RTSL) Vital Strategies, Danielle Cazabon, Andrew E. Moran, Yvonne Commodore-Mensah receive salary support from Resolve to Save Lives, an initiative of Vital Strategies. Resolve to Save Lives is jointly supported by grants from Bloomberg Philanthropies, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and Gates Philanthropy Partners, which is funded with support from the Chan Zuckerberg Foundation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9035722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90357222022-04-26 Determining the frequency and level of task-sharing for hypertension management in LMICs: A systematic review and meta-analysis Ogungbe, Oluwabunmi Cazabon, Danielle Ajenikoko, Adefunke Jeemon, Panniyammakal Moran, Andrew E. Commodore-Mensah, Yvonne EClinicalMedicine Articles BACKGROUND: Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) bear a disproportionately higher burden of Cardiovascular Disease (CVD). Team-based care approach adds capacity to improve blood pressure (BP) control. This updated review aimed to test team-based care efficacy at different levels of hypertension team-based care complexity. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL for newer articles on task-sharing interventions to manage hypertension in LMICs. Levels of tasks complexity performed by healthcare workers added to the clinical team in hypertension control programs were categorized as administrative tasks (level 1), basic clinical tasks (level 2), and/or advanced clinical tasks (level 3). Meta-analysis using an inverse variance weighted random-effects model summarized trial-based evidence on the efficacy of team-based care on BP control, compared with usual care. FINDINGS: Forty-three RCT articles were included in the meta-analysis: 31 studies from the previous systematic review, 12 articles from the updated search. The pooled mean effect for team-based care was a -4.6 mm Hg (95% CI: -5.8, -3.4, I(2) = 80.2%) decrease in systolic BP compared with usual care. We found similar comparative reduction among different levels of team-based care complexity, i.e., administrative and basic clinical tasks (-4.7 mm Hg, 95% CI: -6.8, -2.2; I(2) = 79.8%); and advanced clinical tasks (-4.5 mmHg, 95%CI: -6.1, -3.3; I(2) = 81%). Systolic BP was reduced most by team-based care involving pharmacists (-7.3 mm Hg, 95% CI: -9.2, -5.4; I(2) = 67.2%); followed by nurses (-5.1 mm Hg, 95% CI: -8.0, -2.2; I(2) = 72.7%), dieticians (-4.7 mmHg, 95%CI: -7.1, -2.3; I(2) = 0.0%), then community health workers (-3.3 mm Hg, 95% CI: -4.8, -1.8; I(2) = 77.3%). INTERPRETATION: Overall, team-based hypertension care interventions consistently contributed to lower systolic BP compared to usual care; the effect size varies by the clinical training of the healthcare team members. FUNDING: Resolve To Save Lives (RTSL) Vital Strategies, Danielle Cazabon, Andrew E. Moran, Yvonne Commodore-Mensah receive salary support from Resolve to Save Lives, an initiative of Vital Strategies. Resolve to Save Lives is jointly supported by grants from Bloomberg Philanthropies, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and Gates Philanthropy Partners, which is funded with support from the Chan Zuckerberg Foundation. Elsevier 2022-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9035722/ /pubmed/35480075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101388 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Ogungbe, Oluwabunmi
Cazabon, Danielle
Ajenikoko, Adefunke
Jeemon, Panniyammakal
Moran, Andrew E.
Commodore-Mensah, Yvonne
Determining the frequency and level of task-sharing for hypertension management in LMICs: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Determining the frequency and level of task-sharing for hypertension management in LMICs: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Determining the frequency and level of task-sharing for hypertension management in LMICs: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Determining the frequency and level of task-sharing for hypertension management in LMICs: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Determining the frequency and level of task-sharing for hypertension management in LMICs: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Determining the frequency and level of task-sharing for hypertension management in LMICs: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort determining the frequency and level of task-sharing for hypertension management in lmics: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9035722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35480075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101388
work_keys_str_mv AT ogungbeoluwabunmi determiningthefrequencyandleveloftasksharingforhypertensionmanagementinlmicsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cazabondanielle determiningthefrequencyandleveloftasksharingforhypertensionmanagementinlmicsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ajenikokoadefunke determiningthefrequencyandleveloftasksharingforhypertensionmanagementinlmicsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jeemonpanniyammakal determiningthefrequencyandleveloftasksharingforhypertensionmanagementinlmicsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT moranandrewe determiningthefrequencyandleveloftasksharingforhypertensionmanagementinlmicsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT commodoremensahyvonne determiningthefrequencyandleveloftasksharingforhypertensionmanagementinlmicsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis