Cargando…

A Novel Splenic Vein Flow Volume to the Portal Vein Flow Velocity Index as a Predictor for the Degree of Esophageal Varices in Liver Cirrhosis Patients

Bleeding esophageal varices (EV) have the highest mortality rate from all complications of liver cirrhosis (LC). Several Doppler ultrasound (DUS) studies have been done on the splenic or portal vein (PV) to evaluate the hemodynamic of the esophageal vein. Our study focused on finding a better index...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wicaksono, Krishna Pandu, Matondang, Sahat, Silman, Christopher, Prihartono, Joedo, Lesmana, Cosmas Rinaldi Adithya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9035959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35528777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000523757
_version_ 1784693415861026816
author Wicaksono, Krishna Pandu
Matondang, Sahat
Silman, Christopher
Prihartono, Joedo
Lesmana, Cosmas Rinaldi Adithya
author_facet Wicaksono, Krishna Pandu
Matondang, Sahat
Silman, Christopher
Prihartono, Joedo
Lesmana, Cosmas Rinaldi Adithya
author_sort Wicaksono, Krishna Pandu
collection PubMed
description Bleeding esophageal varices (EV) have the highest mortality rate from all complications of liver cirrhosis (LC). Several Doppler ultrasound (DUS) studies have been done on the splenic or portal vein (PV) to evaluate the hemodynamic of the esophageal vein. Our study focused on finding a better index using the ratio from two parameters correlated with EV, splenic vein flow volume (SFV), and PV flow velocity. In this study, 28 patients with LC were evaluated using DUS to compare the SFV to PV flow velocity/speed (Sv/Ps) index and other measured DUS parameters with the EV degree. Afterward, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed on statistically significant DUS parameters. Mean Sv/Ps index value in the group of nonvarices was 9.89 ± 3.56; 19.50 ± 5.56 in the small esophageal varices (SEV) and 74.12 ± 29.37 in the large esophageal varices (LEV) group with p < 0.001. ROC curve analysis generated an optimal cutoff point of 16.5 (90% sensitivity and 100% specificity) to predict the presence of EV and the cutoff point of 46.7 (100% sensitivity and specificity) to predict the presence of LEV. In conclusion, the Sv/Ps index measured using DUS can be used as a noninvasive method to predict the presence of EV, especially in predicting LEV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9035959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90359592022-05-06 A Novel Splenic Vein Flow Volume to the Portal Vein Flow Velocity Index as a Predictor for the Degree of Esophageal Varices in Liver Cirrhosis Patients Wicaksono, Krishna Pandu Matondang, Sahat Silman, Christopher Prihartono, Joedo Lesmana, Cosmas Rinaldi Adithya Case Rep Gastroenterol Case Series Bleeding esophageal varices (EV) have the highest mortality rate from all complications of liver cirrhosis (LC). Several Doppler ultrasound (DUS) studies have been done on the splenic or portal vein (PV) to evaluate the hemodynamic of the esophageal vein. Our study focused on finding a better index using the ratio from two parameters correlated with EV, splenic vein flow volume (SFV), and PV flow velocity. In this study, 28 patients with LC were evaluated using DUS to compare the SFV to PV flow velocity/speed (Sv/Ps) index and other measured DUS parameters with the EV degree. Afterward, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed on statistically significant DUS parameters. Mean Sv/Ps index value in the group of nonvarices was 9.89 ± 3.56; 19.50 ± 5.56 in the small esophageal varices (SEV) and 74.12 ± 29.37 in the large esophageal varices (LEV) group with p < 0.001. ROC curve analysis generated an optimal cutoff point of 16.5 (90% sensitivity and 100% specificity) to predict the presence of EV and the cutoff point of 46.7 (100% sensitivity and specificity) to predict the presence of LEV. In conclusion, the Sv/Ps index measured using DUS can be used as a noninvasive method to predict the presence of EV, especially in predicting LEV. S. Karger AG 2022-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9035959/ /pubmed/35528777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000523757 Text en Copyright © 2022 by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-4.0 International License (CC BY-NC) (http://www.karger.com/Services/OpenAccessLicense). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission.
spellingShingle Case Series
Wicaksono, Krishna Pandu
Matondang, Sahat
Silman, Christopher
Prihartono, Joedo
Lesmana, Cosmas Rinaldi Adithya
A Novel Splenic Vein Flow Volume to the Portal Vein Flow Velocity Index as a Predictor for the Degree of Esophageal Varices in Liver Cirrhosis Patients
title A Novel Splenic Vein Flow Volume to the Portal Vein Flow Velocity Index as a Predictor for the Degree of Esophageal Varices in Liver Cirrhosis Patients
title_full A Novel Splenic Vein Flow Volume to the Portal Vein Flow Velocity Index as a Predictor for the Degree of Esophageal Varices in Liver Cirrhosis Patients
title_fullStr A Novel Splenic Vein Flow Volume to the Portal Vein Flow Velocity Index as a Predictor for the Degree of Esophageal Varices in Liver Cirrhosis Patients
title_full_unstemmed A Novel Splenic Vein Flow Volume to the Portal Vein Flow Velocity Index as a Predictor for the Degree of Esophageal Varices in Liver Cirrhosis Patients
title_short A Novel Splenic Vein Flow Volume to the Portal Vein Flow Velocity Index as a Predictor for the Degree of Esophageal Varices in Liver Cirrhosis Patients
title_sort novel splenic vein flow volume to the portal vein flow velocity index as a predictor for the degree of esophageal varices in liver cirrhosis patients
topic Case Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9035959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35528777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000523757
work_keys_str_mv AT wicaksonokrishnapandu anovelsplenicveinflowvolumetotheportalveinflowvelocityindexasapredictorforthedegreeofesophagealvaricesinlivercirrhosispatients
AT matondangsahat anovelsplenicveinflowvolumetotheportalveinflowvelocityindexasapredictorforthedegreeofesophagealvaricesinlivercirrhosispatients
AT silmanchristopher anovelsplenicveinflowvolumetotheportalveinflowvelocityindexasapredictorforthedegreeofesophagealvaricesinlivercirrhosispatients
AT prihartonojoedo anovelsplenicveinflowvolumetotheportalveinflowvelocityindexasapredictorforthedegreeofesophagealvaricesinlivercirrhosispatients
AT lesmanacosmasrinaldiadithya anovelsplenicveinflowvolumetotheportalveinflowvelocityindexasapredictorforthedegreeofesophagealvaricesinlivercirrhosispatients
AT wicaksonokrishnapandu novelsplenicveinflowvolumetotheportalveinflowvelocityindexasapredictorforthedegreeofesophagealvaricesinlivercirrhosispatients
AT matondangsahat novelsplenicveinflowvolumetotheportalveinflowvelocityindexasapredictorforthedegreeofesophagealvaricesinlivercirrhosispatients
AT silmanchristopher novelsplenicveinflowvolumetotheportalveinflowvelocityindexasapredictorforthedegreeofesophagealvaricesinlivercirrhosispatients
AT prihartonojoedo novelsplenicveinflowvolumetotheportalveinflowvelocityindexasapredictorforthedegreeofesophagealvaricesinlivercirrhosispatients
AT lesmanacosmasrinaldiadithya novelsplenicveinflowvolumetotheportalveinflowvelocityindexasapredictorforthedegreeofesophagealvaricesinlivercirrhosispatients