Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillectomy: a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study on 227 patients
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic papillectomy is a minimally invasive treatment for benign tumors of the ampulla of Vater or early ampullary carcinoma. However, reported recurrence rates are significant and risk factors for recurrence are unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9036320/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35480299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562848221090820 |
_version_ | 1784693498173194240 |
---|---|
author | Gondran, Hannah Musquer, Nicolas Perez-Cuadrado-Robles, Enrique Deprez, Pierre Henri Buisson, François Berger, Arthur Cesbron-Métivier, Elodie Wallenhorst, Timothee David, Nicolas Cholet, Franck Perrot, Bastien Quénéhervé, Lucille Coron, Emmanuel |
author_facet | Gondran, Hannah Musquer, Nicolas Perez-Cuadrado-Robles, Enrique Deprez, Pierre Henri Buisson, François Berger, Arthur Cesbron-Métivier, Elodie Wallenhorst, Timothee David, Nicolas Cholet, Franck Perrot, Bastien Quénéhervé, Lucille Coron, Emmanuel |
author_sort | Gondran, Hannah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Endoscopic papillectomy is a minimally invasive treatment for benign tumors of the ampulla of Vater or early ampullary carcinoma. However, reported recurrence rates are significant and risk factors for recurrence are unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillectomy and to identify risk factors for recurrence and adverse events. METHODS: All patients who underwent endoscopic papillectomy at five tertiary referral centers between January 2008 and December 2018 were included. Recurrence was defined as the detection of residue on one of the follow-up endoscopies. Treatment success was defined as the absence of tumor residue on the last follow-up endoscopy. RESULTS: A total of 227 patients were included. The resections were en bloc in 64.8% of cases. The mean lesion size was 20 mm (range: 3–80) with lateral extension in 23.3% of cases. R0 resection was achieved in 45.3% of cases. The recurrence rate was 30.6%, and 60.7% of recurrences were successfully treated with additional endoscopic treatment. Finally, treatment success was achieved in 82.8% of patients with a median follow-up time of 22.3 months. R1 resection, intraductal invasion, and tumor size > 2 cm were associated with local recurrence. Adverse events occurred in 36.6% of patients and included pancreatitis (17.6%), post-procedural hemorrhage (11.0%), perforation (5.2%), and biliary stenosis (2.6%). The mortality rate was 0.9%. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic papillectomy is an effective and relatively well-tolerated treatment for localized ampullary tumors. In this series, R1 resection, intraductal invasion, and lesion size > 2 cm were associated with local recurrence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9036320 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90363202022-04-26 Efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillectomy: a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study on 227 patients Gondran, Hannah Musquer, Nicolas Perez-Cuadrado-Robles, Enrique Deprez, Pierre Henri Buisson, François Berger, Arthur Cesbron-Métivier, Elodie Wallenhorst, Timothee David, Nicolas Cholet, Franck Perrot, Bastien Quénéhervé, Lucille Coron, Emmanuel Therap Adv Gastroenterol Original Research BACKGROUND: Endoscopic papillectomy is a minimally invasive treatment for benign tumors of the ampulla of Vater or early ampullary carcinoma. However, reported recurrence rates are significant and risk factors for recurrence are unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillectomy and to identify risk factors for recurrence and adverse events. METHODS: All patients who underwent endoscopic papillectomy at five tertiary referral centers between January 2008 and December 2018 were included. Recurrence was defined as the detection of residue on one of the follow-up endoscopies. Treatment success was defined as the absence of tumor residue on the last follow-up endoscopy. RESULTS: A total of 227 patients were included. The resections were en bloc in 64.8% of cases. The mean lesion size was 20 mm (range: 3–80) with lateral extension in 23.3% of cases. R0 resection was achieved in 45.3% of cases. The recurrence rate was 30.6%, and 60.7% of recurrences were successfully treated with additional endoscopic treatment. Finally, treatment success was achieved in 82.8% of patients with a median follow-up time of 22.3 months. R1 resection, intraductal invasion, and tumor size > 2 cm were associated with local recurrence. Adverse events occurred in 36.6% of patients and included pancreatitis (17.6%), post-procedural hemorrhage (11.0%), perforation (5.2%), and biliary stenosis (2.6%). The mortality rate was 0.9%. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic papillectomy is an effective and relatively well-tolerated treatment for localized ampullary tumors. In this series, R1 resection, intraductal invasion, and lesion size > 2 cm were associated with local recurrence. SAGE Publications 2022-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9036320/ /pubmed/35480299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562848221090820 Text en © The Author(s), 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Gondran, Hannah Musquer, Nicolas Perez-Cuadrado-Robles, Enrique Deprez, Pierre Henri Buisson, François Berger, Arthur Cesbron-Métivier, Elodie Wallenhorst, Timothee David, Nicolas Cholet, Franck Perrot, Bastien Quénéhervé, Lucille Coron, Emmanuel Efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillectomy: a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study on 227 patients |
title | Efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillectomy: a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study on 227 patients |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillectomy: a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study on 227 patients |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillectomy: a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study on 227 patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillectomy: a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study on 227 patients |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillectomy: a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study on 227 patients |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillectomy: a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study on 227 patients |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9036320/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35480299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562848221090820 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gondranhannah efficacyandsafetyofendoscopicpapillectomyamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyon227patients AT musquernicolas efficacyandsafetyofendoscopicpapillectomyamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyon227patients AT perezcuadradoroblesenrique efficacyandsafetyofendoscopicpapillectomyamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyon227patients AT deprezpierrehenri efficacyandsafetyofendoscopicpapillectomyamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyon227patients AT buissonfrancois efficacyandsafetyofendoscopicpapillectomyamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyon227patients AT bergerarthur efficacyandsafetyofendoscopicpapillectomyamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyon227patients AT cesbronmetivierelodie efficacyandsafetyofendoscopicpapillectomyamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyon227patients AT wallenhorsttimothee efficacyandsafetyofendoscopicpapillectomyamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyon227patients AT davidnicolas efficacyandsafetyofendoscopicpapillectomyamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyon227patients AT choletfranck efficacyandsafetyofendoscopicpapillectomyamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyon227patients AT perrotbastien efficacyandsafetyofendoscopicpapillectomyamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyon227patients AT quenehervelucille efficacyandsafetyofendoscopicpapillectomyamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyon227patients AT coronemmanuel efficacyandsafetyofendoscopicpapillectomyamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyon227patients |