A Novel MRI Mapping Technique for Evaluating Bone Bruising Patterns Associated With Noncontact ACL Ruptures

BACKGROUND: Bone bruise patterns in the knee can aid in understanding the mechanism of injury in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures. There is no universally accepted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) mapping technique to describe the specific locations of bone bruises. HYPOTHESIS: The authors hypothesized that (1) our novel mapping technique would show high interrater and intrarater reliability for the location of bone bruises in noncontact ACL-injured knees and (2) the bone bruise patterns reported from this technique would support the most common mechanisms of noncontact ACL injury, including valgus stress, anterior tibial translation, and internal tibial rotation. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Included were 43 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction between 2018 and 2020, with MRI within 30 days of the injury on a 3.0-T scanner, documentation of a noncontact mechanism of injury, and no concomitant or previous knee injuries. Images were retrospectively reviewed by 2 radiologists blinded to all clinical data. The locations of bone bruises were mapped on fat-suppressed T2-weighted coronal and sagittal images using a novel technique that combined the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) tibiofemoral articular cartilage surgical lesions diagram and the Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring (WORMS) mapping system. Reliability between the reviewers was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), where ICC >0.90 indicated excellent agreement. RESULTS: The interrater and intrarater ICCs were 0.918 and 0.974, respectively, for femoral edema mapping and 0.979 and 0.978, respectively, for tibial edema mapping. Significantly more bone bruises were seen within the lateral femoral condyle compared with the medial femoral condyle (67% vs 33%; P < .0001), and more bruises were seen within the lateral tibial plateau compared with the medial tibial plateau (65% vs 35%; P < .0001). Femoral bruises were almost exclusively located in the anterior/central regions (98%) of the condyles as opposed to the posterior region (2%; P < .0001). Tibial bruises were localized to the posterior region (78%) of both plateaus as opposed to the anterior/central regions (22%; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: The combined mapping technique offered a standardized and reliable method for reporting bone bruises in noncontact ACL injuries. The contusion patterns identified using this technique were indicative of the most commonly reported mechanisms for noncontact ACL injuries.