Cargando…

Optimal timing of introducing mobilization therapy for ICU patients with sepsis

BACKGROUND: For patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with sepsis, mobilization therapy during ICU stay can improve their outcomes during and after the ICU stay. However, little is known about the optimal timing of introducing mobilization therapy. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Keibun, Shibata, Junichiro, Fukuchi, Kiyoyasu, Takahashi, Kunihiko, Sonoo, Tomohiro, Ogura, Takayuki, Goto, Tadahiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9036689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35468868
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-022-00613-8
_version_ 1784693570412740608
author Liu, Keibun
Shibata, Junichiro
Fukuchi, Kiyoyasu
Takahashi, Kunihiko
Sonoo, Tomohiro
Ogura, Takayuki
Goto, Tadahiro
author_facet Liu, Keibun
Shibata, Junichiro
Fukuchi, Kiyoyasu
Takahashi, Kunihiko
Sonoo, Tomohiro
Ogura, Takayuki
Goto, Tadahiro
author_sort Liu, Keibun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with sepsis, mobilization therapy during ICU stay can improve their outcomes during and after the ICU stay. However, little is known about the optimal timing of introducing mobilization therapy. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using data from a tertiary medical center in Japan during 2013–2017. We included patients aged ≥ 18 years who were admitted to the ICU with sepsis based on the Sepsis-3 criteria. We defined early mobilization (EM) as the rehabilitation at the level of sitting on the edge of the bed or more within the first 3 days of the patients’ ICU stay. Patients were divided into the EM and non-EM groups. The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and ambulatory dependence at hospital discharge. We estimated the effects of EM by stabilized inverse probability weighting (sIPW). We then tested alternative definitions of EM by changing the cutoff in days to mobilization by 1-day increments from 2 to 7 days to investigate the optimal timing of mobilization. RESULTS: Our study sample consisted of a total of 296 septic patients, including 96 patients in the EM group and 200 patients in the non-EM group. In the sIPW model, the adjusted OR for in-hospital mortality in the EM group compared to the non-EM group was 0.22 [95% CI 0.06–0.88], and the adjusted OR for ambulatory dependence at the hospital discharge was 0.24 [95% CI 0.09–0.61]. When alternative definitions of EM were tested, patients who achieved mobilization within the first 2–4 days of their ICU stays had better outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Achieving mobilization within the first 3 days of ICU stay was significantly associated with better outcomes. Patients with sepsis might benefit most from achieving mobilization within 2–4 days. Further studies are warranted to validate the findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40560-022-00613-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9036689
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90366892022-04-26 Optimal timing of introducing mobilization therapy for ICU patients with sepsis Liu, Keibun Shibata, Junichiro Fukuchi, Kiyoyasu Takahashi, Kunihiko Sonoo, Tomohiro Ogura, Takayuki Goto, Tadahiro J Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: For patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with sepsis, mobilization therapy during ICU stay can improve their outcomes during and after the ICU stay. However, little is known about the optimal timing of introducing mobilization therapy. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using data from a tertiary medical center in Japan during 2013–2017. We included patients aged ≥ 18 years who were admitted to the ICU with sepsis based on the Sepsis-3 criteria. We defined early mobilization (EM) as the rehabilitation at the level of sitting on the edge of the bed or more within the first 3 days of the patients’ ICU stay. Patients were divided into the EM and non-EM groups. The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and ambulatory dependence at hospital discharge. We estimated the effects of EM by stabilized inverse probability weighting (sIPW). We then tested alternative definitions of EM by changing the cutoff in days to mobilization by 1-day increments from 2 to 7 days to investigate the optimal timing of mobilization. RESULTS: Our study sample consisted of a total of 296 septic patients, including 96 patients in the EM group and 200 patients in the non-EM group. In the sIPW model, the adjusted OR for in-hospital mortality in the EM group compared to the non-EM group was 0.22 [95% CI 0.06–0.88], and the adjusted OR for ambulatory dependence at the hospital discharge was 0.24 [95% CI 0.09–0.61]. When alternative definitions of EM were tested, patients who achieved mobilization within the first 2–4 days of their ICU stays had better outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Achieving mobilization within the first 3 days of ICU stay was significantly associated with better outcomes. Patients with sepsis might benefit most from achieving mobilization within 2–4 days. Further studies are warranted to validate the findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40560-022-00613-8. BioMed Central 2022-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9036689/ /pubmed/35468868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-022-00613-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Liu, Keibun
Shibata, Junichiro
Fukuchi, Kiyoyasu
Takahashi, Kunihiko
Sonoo, Tomohiro
Ogura, Takayuki
Goto, Tadahiro
Optimal timing of introducing mobilization therapy for ICU patients with sepsis
title Optimal timing of introducing mobilization therapy for ICU patients with sepsis
title_full Optimal timing of introducing mobilization therapy for ICU patients with sepsis
title_fullStr Optimal timing of introducing mobilization therapy for ICU patients with sepsis
title_full_unstemmed Optimal timing of introducing mobilization therapy for ICU patients with sepsis
title_short Optimal timing of introducing mobilization therapy for ICU patients with sepsis
title_sort optimal timing of introducing mobilization therapy for icu patients with sepsis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9036689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35468868
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-022-00613-8
work_keys_str_mv AT liukeibun optimaltimingofintroducingmobilizationtherapyforicupatientswithsepsis
AT shibatajunichiro optimaltimingofintroducingmobilizationtherapyforicupatientswithsepsis
AT fukuchikiyoyasu optimaltimingofintroducingmobilizationtherapyforicupatientswithsepsis
AT takahashikunihiko optimaltimingofintroducingmobilizationtherapyforicupatientswithsepsis
AT sonootomohiro optimaltimingofintroducingmobilizationtherapyforicupatientswithsepsis
AT oguratakayuki optimaltimingofintroducingmobilizationtherapyforicupatientswithsepsis
AT gototadahiro optimaltimingofintroducingmobilizationtherapyforicupatientswithsepsis