Cargando…

External validation of the T.O.HO. score as predictor of success after retrograde intrarenal surgery

BACKGROUND: To assess the effectiveness of T.O.HO. (Tallness, Occupied lesion, Houndsfield unit evaluation) score in predicting the retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) success and to validate this scoring system. METHODS: The age, sex, previous stone surgery, hospitalization, surgery duration, post...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Senel, Samet, Kasap, Yusuf, Kizilkan, Yalcin, Tastemur, Sedat, Ozden, Cuneyt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9036695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35462554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-01018-3
_version_ 1784693571419373568
author Senel, Samet
Kasap, Yusuf
Kizilkan, Yalcin
Tastemur, Sedat
Ozden, Cuneyt
author_facet Senel, Samet
Kasap, Yusuf
Kizilkan, Yalcin
Tastemur, Sedat
Ozden, Cuneyt
author_sort Senel, Samet
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To assess the effectiveness of T.O.HO. (Tallness, Occupied lesion, Houndsfield unit evaluation) score in predicting the retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) success and to validate this scoring system. METHODS: The age, sex, previous stone surgery, hospitalization, surgery duration, postoperative complication, stone length, stone location, stone density, stone number, lateralization, presence of hydronephrosis, and presence of preoperative stent datas of 611 patients who underwent RIRS in our clinic between January 2013 and January 2021 were retrospectively assessed. The patients were divided into two groups as successful and unsuccessful. The T.O.HO scores of all patients were calculated. RESULTS: The success rate was 72.5%. Compared to the unsuccessful group, stone length and stone density were lower, surgery duration was shorter and there were less lower pole stones in the successful group (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of the other parameters. The T.O.HO. score was significantly lower in the successful group compared to the unsuccessful group (p < 0.001). According to the multivariate logistic regression analysis, stone length (OR: 0.905; 95% Cl: 0.866–0.946; p < 0.001), lower pole location (OR: 0.546; 95% Cl: 0.013–0.296; p < 0.001), stone density (OR: 0.999; 95% Cl: 0.998–1; p = 0.044) and the T.O.HO. score (OR: 0.684; 95%Cl: 0.554–0.844; p < 0.001) were found as the independent risk factors for RIRS success. ROC curve analysis showed that the T.O.HO. score could predict the RIRS success with 7.5 cut-off point (AUC: 0.799, CI: 0.76–0.839; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The T.O.HO. score can predict RIRS success with a high rate of accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9036695
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90366952022-04-26 External validation of the T.O.HO. score as predictor of success after retrograde intrarenal surgery Senel, Samet Kasap, Yusuf Kizilkan, Yalcin Tastemur, Sedat Ozden, Cuneyt BMC Urol Research BACKGROUND: To assess the effectiveness of T.O.HO. (Tallness, Occupied lesion, Houndsfield unit evaluation) score in predicting the retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) success and to validate this scoring system. METHODS: The age, sex, previous stone surgery, hospitalization, surgery duration, postoperative complication, stone length, stone location, stone density, stone number, lateralization, presence of hydronephrosis, and presence of preoperative stent datas of 611 patients who underwent RIRS in our clinic between January 2013 and January 2021 were retrospectively assessed. The patients were divided into two groups as successful and unsuccessful. The T.O.HO scores of all patients were calculated. RESULTS: The success rate was 72.5%. Compared to the unsuccessful group, stone length and stone density were lower, surgery duration was shorter and there were less lower pole stones in the successful group (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of the other parameters. The T.O.HO. score was significantly lower in the successful group compared to the unsuccessful group (p < 0.001). According to the multivariate logistic regression analysis, stone length (OR: 0.905; 95% Cl: 0.866–0.946; p < 0.001), lower pole location (OR: 0.546; 95% Cl: 0.013–0.296; p < 0.001), stone density (OR: 0.999; 95% Cl: 0.998–1; p = 0.044) and the T.O.HO. score (OR: 0.684; 95%Cl: 0.554–0.844; p < 0.001) were found as the independent risk factors for RIRS success. ROC curve analysis showed that the T.O.HO. score could predict the RIRS success with 7.5 cut-off point (AUC: 0.799, CI: 0.76–0.839; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The T.O.HO. score can predict RIRS success with a high rate of accuracy. BioMed Central 2022-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9036695/ /pubmed/35462554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-01018-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Senel, Samet
Kasap, Yusuf
Kizilkan, Yalcin
Tastemur, Sedat
Ozden, Cuneyt
External validation of the T.O.HO. score as predictor of success after retrograde intrarenal surgery
title External validation of the T.O.HO. score as predictor of success after retrograde intrarenal surgery
title_full External validation of the T.O.HO. score as predictor of success after retrograde intrarenal surgery
title_fullStr External validation of the T.O.HO. score as predictor of success after retrograde intrarenal surgery
title_full_unstemmed External validation of the T.O.HO. score as predictor of success after retrograde intrarenal surgery
title_short External validation of the T.O.HO. score as predictor of success after retrograde intrarenal surgery
title_sort external validation of the t.o.ho. score as predictor of success after retrograde intrarenal surgery
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9036695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35462554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-01018-3
work_keys_str_mv AT senelsamet externalvalidationofthetohoscoreaspredictorofsuccessafterretrogradeintrarenalsurgery
AT kasapyusuf externalvalidationofthetohoscoreaspredictorofsuccessafterretrogradeintrarenalsurgery
AT kizilkanyalcin externalvalidationofthetohoscoreaspredictorofsuccessafterretrogradeintrarenalsurgery
AT tastemursedat externalvalidationofthetohoscoreaspredictorofsuccessafterretrogradeintrarenalsurgery
AT ozdencuneyt externalvalidationofthetohoscoreaspredictorofsuccessafterretrogradeintrarenalsurgery