Cargando…

Global status of antimicrobial resistance among environmental isolates of Vibrio cholerae O1/O139: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Vibrio cholerae O1/O139 were the predominant circulating serogroups exhibiting multi-drug resistance (MDR) during the cholera outbreak which led to cholera treatment failures. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the weighted pooled resistance (WPR) rates in V. cholerae O1/O13...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuan, Xin-hui, Li, Yu-mei, Vaziri, Ali Zaman, Kaviar, Vahab Hassan, Jin, Yang, Jin, Yu, Maleki, Abbas, Omidi, Nazanin, Kouhsari, Ebrahim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9036709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35468830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-022-01100-3
_version_ 1784693574635356160
author Yuan, Xin-hui
Li, Yu-mei
Vaziri, Ali Zaman
Kaviar, Vahab Hassan
Jin, Yang
Jin, Yu
Maleki, Abbas
Omidi, Nazanin
Kouhsari, Ebrahim
author_facet Yuan, Xin-hui
Li, Yu-mei
Vaziri, Ali Zaman
Kaviar, Vahab Hassan
Jin, Yang
Jin, Yu
Maleki, Abbas
Omidi, Nazanin
Kouhsari, Ebrahim
author_sort Yuan, Xin-hui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vibrio cholerae O1/O139 were the predominant circulating serogroups exhibiting multi-drug resistance (MDR) during the cholera outbreak which led to cholera treatment failures. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the weighted pooled resistance (WPR) rates in V. cholerae O1/O139 isolates obtained from environmental samples. METHODS: We systematically searched the articles in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase (until January 2020). Subgroup analyses were then employed by publication year, geographic areas, and the quality of studies. Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA software (ver. 14.0). RESULTS: A total of 20 studies investigating 648 environmental V. cholerae O1/O139 isolates were analysed. The majority of the studies were originated from Asia (n = 9). In addition, a large number of studies (n = 15 i.e. 71.4%) included in the meta-analysis revealed the resistance to cotrimoxazole and ciprofloxacin. The WPR rates were as follows: cotrimoxazole 59%, erythromycin 28%, tetracycline 14%, doxycycline 5%, and ciprofloxacin 0%. There was increased resistance to nalidixic acid, cotrimoxazole, furazolidone, and tetracycline while a decreased resistance to amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, chloramphenicol, ampicillin, streptomycin, and ceftriaxone was observed during the years 2000–2020. A significant decrease in the doxycycline and ciprofloxacin-resistance rates in V. cholerae O1/O139 isolates was reported over the years 2011–2020 which represents a decrease in 2001–2010 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroquinolones, gentamicin, ceftriaxone, doxycycline, kanamycin, and cefotaxime showed the highest effectiveness and the lowest resistance rate. However, the main interest is the rise of antimicrobial resistance in V. cholerae strains especially in low-income countries or endemic areas, and therefore, continuous surveillance, careful appropriate AST, and limitation on improper antibiotic usage are crucial. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13756-022-01100-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9036709
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90367092022-04-26 Global status of antimicrobial resistance among environmental isolates of Vibrio cholerae O1/O139: a systematic review and meta-analysis Yuan, Xin-hui Li, Yu-mei Vaziri, Ali Zaman Kaviar, Vahab Hassan Jin, Yang Jin, Yu Maleki, Abbas Omidi, Nazanin Kouhsari, Ebrahim Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Review BACKGROUND: Vibrio cholerae O1/O139 were the predominant circulating serogroups exhibiting multi-drug resistance (MDR) during the cholera outbreak which led to cholera treatment failures. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the weighted pooled resistance (WPR) rates in V. cholerae O1/O139 isolates obtained from environmental samples. METHODS: We systematically searched the articles in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase (until January 2020). Subgroup analyses were then employed by publication year, geographic areas, and the quality of studies. Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA software (ver. 14.0). RESULTS: A total of 20 studies investigating 648 environmental V. cholerae O1/O139 isolates were analysed. The majority of the studies were originated from Asia (n = 9). In addition, a large number of studies (n = 15 i.e. 71.4%) included in the meta-analysis revealed the resistance to cotrimoxazole and ciprofloxacin. The WPR rates were as follows: cotrimoxazole 59%, erythromycin 28%, tetracycline 14%, doxycycline 5%, and ciprofloxacin 0%. There was increased resistance to nalidixic acid, cotrimoxazole, furazolidone, and tetracycline while a decreased resistance to amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, chloramphenicol, ampicillin, streptomycin, and ceftriaxone was observed during the years 2000–2020. A significant decrease in the doxycycline and ciprofloxacin-resistance rates in V. cholerae O1/O139 isolates was reported over the years 2011–2020 which represents a decrease in 2001–2010 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroquinolones, gentamicin, ceftriaxone, doxycycline, kanamycin, and cefotaxime showed the highest effectiveness and the lowest resistance rate. However, the main interest is the rise of antimicrobial resistance in V. cholerae strains especially in low-income countries or endemic areas, and therefore, continuous surveillance, careful appropriate AST, and limitation on improper antibiotic usage are crucial. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13756-022-01100-3. BioMed Central 2022-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9036709/ /pubmed/35468830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-022-01100-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Yuan, Xin-hui
Li, Yu-mei
Vaziri, Ali Zaman
Kaviar, Vahab Hassan
Jin, Yang
Jin, Yu
Maleki, Abbas
Omidi, Nazanin
Kouhsari, Ebrahim
Global status of antimicrobial resistance among environmental isolates of Vibrio cholerae O1/O139: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Global status of antimicrobial resistance among environmental isolates of Vibrio cholerae O1/O139: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Global status of antimicrobial resistance among environmental isolates of Vibrio cholerae O1/O139: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Global status of antimicrobial resistance among environmental isolates of Vibrio cholerae O1/O139: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Global status of antimicrobial resistance among environmental isolates of Vibrio cholerae O1/O139: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Global status of antimicrobial resistance among environmental isolates of Vibrio cholerae O1/O139: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort global status of antimicrobial resistance among environmental isolates of vibrio cholerae o1/o139: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9036709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35468830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-022-01100-3
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanxinhui globalstatusofantimicrobialresistanceamongenvironmentalisolatesofvibriocholeraeo1o139asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liyumei globalstatusofantimicrobialresistanceamongenvironmentalisolatesofvibriocholeraeo1o139asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vazirializaman globalstatusofantimicrobialresistanceamongenvironmentalisolatesofvibriocholeraeo1o139asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kaviarvahabhassan globalstatusofantimicrobialresistanceamongenvironmentalisolatesofvibriocholeraeo1o139asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jinyang globalstatusofantimicrobialresistanceamongenvironmentalisolatesofvibriocholeraeo1o139asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jinyu globalstatusofantimicrobialresistanceamongenvironmentalisolatesofvibriocholeraeo1o139asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT malekiabbas globalstatusofantimicrobialresistanceamongenvironmentalisolatesofvibriocholeraeo1o139asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT omidinazanin globalstatusofantimicrobialresistanceamongenvironmentalisolatesofvibriocholeraeo1o139asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kouhsariebrahim globalstatusofantimicrobialresistanceamongenvironmentalisolatesofvibriocholeraeo1o139asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis