Cargando…
Global status of antimicrobial resistance among environmental isolates of Vibrio cholerae O1/O139: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Vibrio cholerae O1/O139 were the predominant circulating serogroups exhibiting multi-drug resistance (MDR) during the cholera outbreak which led to cholera treatment failures. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the weighted pooled resistance (WPR) rates in V. cholerae O1/O13...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9036709/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35468830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-022-01100-3 |
_version_ | 1784693574635356160 |
---|---|
author | Yuan, Xin-hui Li, Yu-mei Vaziri, Ali Zaman Kaviar, Vahab Hassan Jin, Yang Jin, Yu Maleki, Abbas Omidi, Nazanin Kouhsari, Ebrahim |
author_facet | Yuan, Xin-hui Li, Yu-mei Vaziri, Ali Zaman Kaviar, Vahab Hassan Jin, Yang Jin, Yu Maleki, Abbas Omidi, Nazanin Kouhsari, Ebrahim |
author_sort | Yuan, Xin-hui |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Vibrio cholerae O1/O139 were the predominant circulating serogroups exhibiting multi-drug resistance (MDR) during the cholera outbreak which led to cholera treatment failures. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the weighted pooled resistance (WPR) rates in V. cholerae O1/O139 isolates obtained from environmental samples. METHODS: We systematically searched the articles in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase (until January 2020). Subgroup analyses were then employed by publication year, geographic areas, and the quality of studies. Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA software (ver. 14.0). RESULTS: A total of 20 studies investigating 648 environmental V. cholerae O1/O139 isolates were analysed. The majority of the studies were originated from Asia (n = 9). In addition, a large number of studies (n = 15 i.e. 71.4%) included in the meta-analysis revealed the resistance to cotrimoxazole and ciprofloxacin. The WPR rates were as follows: cotrimoxazole 59%, erythromycin 28%, tetracycline 14%, doxycycline 5%, and ciprofloxacin 0%. There was increased resistance to nalidixic acid, cotrimoxazole, furazolidone, and tetracycline while a decreased resistance to amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, chloramphenicol, ampicillin, streptomycin, and ceftriaxone was observed during the years 2000–2020. A significant decrease in the doxycycline and ciprofloxacin-resistance rates in V. cholerae O1/O139 isolates was reported over the years 2011–2020 which represents a decrease in 2001–2010 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroquinolones, gentamicin, ceftriaxone, doxycycline, kanamycin, and cefotaxime showed the highest effectiveness and the lowest resistance rate. However, the main interest is the rise of antimicrobial resistance in V. cholerae strains especially in low-income countries or endemic areas, and therefore, continuous surveillance, careful appropriate AST, and limitation on improper antibiotic usage are crucial. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13756-022-01100-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9036709 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90367092022-04-26 Global status of antimicrobial resistance among environmental isolates of Vibrio cholerae O1/O139: a systematic review and meta-analysis Yuan, Xin-hui Li, Yu-mei Vaziri, Ali Zaman Kaviar, Vahab Hassan Jin, Yang Jin, Yu Maleki, Abbas Omidi, Nazanin Kouhsari, Ebrahim Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Review BACKGROUND: Vibrio cholerae O1/O139 were the predominant circulating serogroups exhibiting multi-drug resistance (MDR) during the cholera outbreak which led to cholera treatment failures. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the weighted pooled resistance (WPR) rates in V. cholerae O1/O139 isolates obtained from environmental samples. METHODS: We systematically searched the articles in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase (until January 2020). Subgroup analyses were then employed by publication year, geographic areas, and the quality of studies. Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA software (ver. 14.0). RESULTS: A total of 20 studies investigating 648 environmental V. cholerae O1/O139 isolates were analysed. The majority of the studies were originated from Asia (n = 9). In addition, a large number of studies (n = 15 i.e. 71.4%) included in the meta-analysis revealed the resistance to cotrimoxazole and ciprofloxacin. The WPR rates were as follows: cotrimoxazole 59%, erythromycin 28%, tetracycline 14%, doxycycline 5%, and ciprofloxacin 0%. There was increased resistance to nalidixic acid, cotrimoxazole, furazolidone, and tetracycline while a decreased resistance to amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, chloramphenicol, ampicillin, streptomycin, and ceftriaxone was observed during the years 2000–2020. A significant decrease in the doxycycline and ciprofloxacin-resistance rates in V. cholerae O1/O139 isolates was reported over the years 2011–2020 which represents a decrease in 2001–2010 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroquinolones, gentamicin, ceftriaxone, doxycycline, kanamycin, and cefotaxime showed the highest effectiveness and the lowest resistance rate. However, the main interest is the rise of antimicrobial resistance in V. cholerae strains especially in low-income countries or endemic areas, and therefore, continuous surveillance, careful appropriate AST, and limitation on improper antibiotic usage are crucial. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13756-022-01100-3. BioMed Central 2022-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9036709/ /pubmed/35468830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-022-01100-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Yuan, Xin-hui Li, Yu-mei Vaziri, Ali Zaman Kaviar, Vahab Hassan Jin, Yang Jin, Yu Maleki, Abbas Omidi, Nazanin Kouhsari, Ebrahim Global status of antimicrobial resistance among environmental isolates of Vibrio cholerae O1/O139: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Global status of antimicrobial resistance among environmental isolates of Vibrio cholerae O1/O139: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Global status of antimicrobial resistance among environmental isolates of Vibrio cholerae O1/O139: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Global status of antimicrobial resistance among environmental isolates of Vibrio cholerae O1/O139: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Global status of antimicrobial resistance among environmental isolates of Vibrio cholerae O1/O139: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Global status of antimicrobial resistance among environmental isolates of Vibrio cholerae O1/O139: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | global status of antimicrobial resistance among environmental isolates of vibrio cholerae o1/o139: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9036709/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35468830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-022-01100-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuanxinhui globalstatusofantimicrobialresistanceamongenvironmentalisolatesofvibriocholeraeo1o139asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liyumei globalstatusofantimicrobialresistanceamongenvironmentalisolatesofvibriocholeraeo1o139asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vazirializaman globalstatusofantimicrobialresistanceamongenvironmentalisolatesofvibriocholeraeo1o139asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kaviarvahabhassan globalstatusofantimicrobialresistanceamongenvironmentalisolatesofvibriocholeraeo1o139asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jinyang globalstatusofantimicrobialresistanceamongenvironmentalisolatesofvibriocholeraeo1o139asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jinyu globalstatusofantimicrobialresistanceamongenvironmentalisolatesofvibriocholeraeo1o139asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT malekiabbas globalstatusofantimicrobialresistanceamongenvironmentalisolatesofvibriocholeraeo1o139asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT omidinazanin globalstatusofantimicrobialresistanceamongenvironmentalisolatesofvibriocholeraeo1o139asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kouhsariebrahim globalstatusofantimicrobialresistanceamongenvironmentalisolatesofvibriocholeraeo1o139asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |