Cargando…
Management of depression during the perinatal period: state of the evidence
BACKGROUND: Perinatal depression (PND) is a prevalent ailment that affects both the woman and her family. Addressing PND in primary health care, such as pediatrics and obstetric care settings, has been proposed as an effective way to identify and treat women. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9036756/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35468808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13033-022-00531-0 |
_version_ | 1784693585348657152 |
---|---|
author | Falek, Idan Acri, Mary Dominguez, Joanna Havens, Jennifer McCord, Mary Sisco, Sarah Wilcox, Wendy Hoagwood, Kimberly |
author_facet | Falek, Idan Acri, Mary Dominguez, Joanna Havens, Jennifer McCord, Mary Sisco, Sarah Wilcox, Wendy Hoagwood, Kimberly |
author_sort | Falek, Idan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Perinatal depression (PND) is a prevalent ailment that affects both the woman and her family. Addressing PND in primary health care, such as pediatrics and obstetric care settings, has been proposed as an effective way to identify and treat women. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to examine best practices for management of PND in obstetric and pediatric settings, as well as investigate the evidence that supports the guidelines. METHODS: Guidelines were identified through a literature search and discussion with experts in the field of perinatal depression, while evidence was examined through a literature search of reviews and thereafter experimental studies. RESULTS: Twenty-five guidelines, across 17 organizations were retained for analysis. Findings suggest that there is little or varied guidance on the management of PND, as well as a lack of specificity. Treatment was the topic most frequently reported, followed by screening. However best practices vary greatly and often contradict one another. Across all areas, there is inadequate or contrasting evidence to support these guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Although there was consensus on the key steps in the pathway to care, the review revealed lack of consensus across guidelines on specific issues relating to identification and management of depression during the perinatal period. Clinicians may use these recommendations to guide their practice, but they should be aware of the limitations of the evidence supporting these guidelines and remain alert to new evidence. There is a clear need for researchers and policymakers to prioritize this area in order to develop evidence-based guidelines for managing perinatal depression. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9036756 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90367562022-04-26 Management of depression during the perinatal period: state of the evidence Falek, Idan Acri, Mary Dominguez, Joanna Havens, Jennifer McCord, Mary Sisco, Sarah Wilcox, Wendy Hoagwood, Kimberly Int J Ment Health Syst Review BACKGROUND: Perinatal depression (PND) is a prevalent ailment that affects both the woman and her family. Addressing PND in primary health care, such as pediatrics and obstetric care settings, has been proposed as an effective way to identify and treat women. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to examine best practices for management of PND in obstetric and pediatric settings, as well as investigate the evidence that supports the guidelines. METHODS: Guidelines were identified through a literature search and discussion with experts in the field of perinatal depression, while evidence was examined through a literature search of reviews and thereafter experimental studies. RESULTS: Twenty-five guidelines, across 17 organizations were retained for analysis. Findings suggest that there is little or varied guidance on the management of PND, as well as a lack of specificity. Treatment was the topic most frequently reported, followed by screening. However best practices vary greatly and often contradict one another. Across all areas, there is inadequate or contrasting evidence to support these guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Although there was consensus on the key steps in the pathway to care, the review revealed lack of consensus across guidelines on specific issues relating to identification and management of depression during the perinatal period. Clinicians may use these recommendations to guide their practice, but they should be aware of the limitations of the evidence supporting these guidelines and remain alert to new evidence. There is a clear need for researchers and policymakers to prioritize this area in order to develop evidence-based guidelines for managing perinatal depression. BioMed Central 2022-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9036756/ /pubmed/35468808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13033-022-00531-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Falek, Idan Acri, Mary Dominguez, Joanna Havens, Jennifer McCord, Mary Sisco, Sarah Wilcox, Wendy Hoagwood, Kimberly Management of depression during the perinatal period: state of the evidence |
title | Management of depression during the perinatal period: state of the evidence |
title_full | Management of depression during the perinatal period: state of the evidence |
title_fullStr | Management of depression during the perinatal period: state of the evidence |
title_full_unstemmed | Management of depression during the perinatal period: state of the evidence |
title_short | Management of depression during the perinatal period: state of the evidence |
title_sort | management of depression during the perinatal period: state of the evidence |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9036756/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35468808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13033-022-00531-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT falekidan managementofdepressionduringtheperinatalperiodstateoftheevidence AT acrimary managementofdepressionduringtheperinatalperiodstateoftheevidence AT dominguezjoanna managementofdepressionduringtheperinatalperiodstateoftheevidence AT havensjennifer managementofdepressionduringtheperinatalperiodstateoftheevidence AT mccordmary managementofdepressionduringtheperinatalperiodstateoftheevidence AT siscosarah managementofdepressionduringtheperinatalperiodstateoftheevidence AT wilcoxwendy managementofdepressionduringtheperinatalperiodstateoftheevidence AT hoagwoodkimberly managementofdepressionduringtheperinatalperiodstateoftheevidence |