Cargando…

Are 5-level triage systems improved by using a symptom based approach?—a Danish cohort study

BACKGROUND: Five-level triage systems are being utilized in Danish emergency departments with and without the use of presenting symptoms. The aim of this study was to validate and compare two 5-level triage systems used in Danish emergency departments: “Danish Emergency Process Triage” (DEPT) based...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kongensgaard, Frederik Trier, Fløjstrup, Marianne, Lassen, Annmarie, Dahlin, Jan, Brabrand, Mikkel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9036764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35468799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-022-01016-2
_version_ 1784693587409108992
author Kongensgaard, Frederik Trier
Fløjstrup, Marianne
Lassen, Annmarie
Dahlin, Jan
Brabrand, Mikkel
author_facet Kongensgaard, Frederik Trier
Fløjstrup, Marianne
Lassen, Annmarie
Dahlin, Jan
Brabrand, Mikkel
author_sort Kongensgaard, Frederik Trier
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Five-level triage systems are being utilized in Danish emergency departments with and without the use of presenting symptoms. The aim of this study was to validate and compare two 5-level triage systems used in Danish emergency departments: “Danish Emergency Process Triage” (DEPT) based on a combination of vital signs and presenting symptoms and a locally adapted version of DEPT (VITAL-TRIAGE) using vital signs only. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort using data from five Danish emergency departments. All patients attending an emergency department during the period of 1 April 2012 until 31 December 2015 were included. Validity of the two triage systems was assessed by comparing urgency categories determined by each triage system with critical outcomes: admission to Intensive care unit (ICU) within 24 h, 2-day mortality, diagnosis of critical illness, surgery within 48 h, discharge within 4 h and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: We included 632,196 ED contacts. Sensitivity for 24-h ICU admission was 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.78–0.80) for DEPT and 0.44 (0.41–0.47) for VITAL-TRIAGE. The sensitivity for 2-day mortality was 0.69 (0.67–0.70) for DEPT and 0.37 (0.34–0.41) for VITAL-TRIAGE. The sensitivity to detect diagnoses of critical illness was 0.48 (0.47–0.50) for DEPT and 0.09 (0.08–0.10) for VITAL-TRIAGE. The sensitivity for predicting surgery within 48 h was 0.30 (0.30–0.31) in DEPT and 0.04 (0.04–0.04) in VITAL-TRIAGE. Length of stay was longer in VITAL-TRIAGE than DEPT. The sensitivity of DEPT to predict patients discharged within 4 h was 0.91 (0.91–0.92) while VITAL-TRIAGE was higher at 0.99 (0.99–0.99). The odds ratio for 24-h ICU admission and 2-day mortality was increased in high-urgency categories of both triage systems compared to low-urgency categories. CONCLUSIONS: High urgency categories in both triage systems are correlated with adverse outcomes. The inclusion of presenting symptoms in a modern 5-level triage system led to significantly higher sensitivity measures for the ability to predict outcomes related to patient urgency. DEPT achieves equal prognostic performance as other widespread 5-level triage systems. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-022-01016-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9036764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90367642022-04-26 Are 5-level triage systems improved by using a symptom based approach?—a Danish cohort study Kongensgaard, Frederik Trier Fløjstrup, Marianne Lassen, Annmarie Dahlin, Jan Brabrand, Mikkel Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Five-level triage systems are being utilized in Danish emergency departments with and without the use of presenting symptoms. The aim of this study was to validate and compare two 5-level triage systems used in Danish emergency departments: “Danish Emergency Process Triage” (DEPT) based on a combination of vital signs and presenting symptoms and a locally adapted version of DEPT (VITAL-TRIAGE) using vital signs only. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort using data from five Danish emergency departments. All patients attending an emergency department during the period of 1 April 2012 until 31 December 2015 were included. Validity of the two triage systems was assessed by comparing urgency categories determined by each triage system with critical outcomes: admission to Intensive care unit (ICU) within 24 h, 2-day mortality, diagnosis of critical illness, surgery within 48 h, discharge within 4 h and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: We included 632,196 ED contacts. Sensitivity for 24-h ICU admission was 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.78–0.80) for DEPT and 0.44 (0.41–0.47) for VITAL-TRIAGE. The sensitivity for 2-day mortality was 0.69 (0.67–0.70) for DEPT and 0.37 (0.34–0.41) for VITAL-TRIAGE. The sensitivity to detect diagnoses of critical illness was 0.48 (0.47–0.50) for DEPT and 0.09 (0.08–0.10) for VITAL-TRIAGE. The sensitivity for predicting surgery within 48 h was 0.30 (0.30–0.31) in DEPT and 0.04 (0.04–0.04) in VITAL-TRIAGE. Length of stay was longer in VITAL-TRIAGE than DEPT. The sensitivity of DEPT to predict patients discharged within 4 h was 0.91 (0.91–0.92) while VITAL-TRIAGE was higher at 0.99 (0.99–0.99). The odds ratio for 24-h ICU admission and 2-day mortality was increased in high-urgency categories of both triage systems compared to low-urgency categories. CONCLUSIONS: High urgency categories in both triage systems are correlated with adverse outcomes. The inclusion of presenting symptoms in a modern 5-level triage system led to significantly higher sensitivity measures for the ability to predict outcomes related to patient urgency. DEPT achieves equal prognostic performance as other widespread 5-level triage systems. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-022-01016-2. BioMed Central 2022-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9036764/ /pubmed/35468799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-022-01016-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kongensgaard, Frederik Trier
Fløjstrup, Marianne
Lassen, Annmarie
Dahlin, Jan
Brabrand, Mikkel
Are 5-level triage systems improved by using a symptom based approach?—a Danish cohort study
title Are 5-level triage systems improved by using a symptom based approach?—a Danish cohort study
title_full Are 5-level triage systems improved by using a symptom based approach?—a Danish cohort study
title_fullStr Are 5-level triage systems improved by using a symptom based approach?—a Danish cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Are 5-level triage systems improved by using a symptom based approach?—a Danish cohort study
title_short Are 5-level triage systems improved by using a symptom based approach?—a Danish cohort study
title_sort are 5-level triage systems improved by using a symptom based approach?—a danish cohort study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9036764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35468799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-022-01016-2
work_keys_str_mv AT kongensgaardfrederiktrier are5leveltriagesystemsimprovedbyusingasymptombasedapproachadanishcohortstudy
AT fløjstrupmarianne are5leveltriagesystemsimprovedbyusingasymptombasedapproachadanishcohortstudy
AT lassenannmarie are5leveltriagesystemsimprovedbyusingasymptombasedapproachadanishcohortstudy
AT dahlinjan are5leveltriagesystemsimprovedbyusingasymptombasedapproachadanishcohortstudy
AT brabrandmikkel are5leveltriagesystemsimprovedbyusingasymptombasedapproachadanishcohortstudy