Cargando…

Risk Prediction of Cerebral Infarction after Anterior Circulation Aneurysm Rupture in an Under-Equipped Centre

BACKGROUND: Morbidity and mortality is high among aneurysm rupture patients. Despite surviving the initial rupture, morbidity is high as they suffer from vasospasm and cerebral infarction (CI). Most prediction tools for CI after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) are complex and are not routi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: VINODH, Vayara Perumall, GHANI, Abdul Rahman Izaini, KANDASAMY, Regunath, SELLAMUTHU, Pulivendhan, ZENIAN, Mohd Sofan, KEOWMANI, Thamron
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9036933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35528813
http://dx.doi.org/10.21315/mjms2022.29.2.5
_version_ 1784693623049158656
author VINODH, Vayara Perumall
GHANI, Abdul Rahman Izaini
KANDASAMY, Regunath
SELLAMUTHU, Pulivendhan
ZENIAN, Mohd Sofan
KEOWMANI, Thamron
author_facet VINODH, Vayara Perumall
GHANI, Abdul Rahman Izaini
KANDASAMY, Regunath
SELLAMUTHU, Pulivendhan
ZENIAN, Mohd Sofan
KEOWMANI, Thamron
author_sort VINODH, Vayara Perumall
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Morbidity and mortality is high among aneurysm rupture patients. Despite surviving the initial rupture, morbidity is high as they suffer from vasospasm and cerebral infarction (CI). Most prediction tools for CI after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) are complex and are not routinely available in all neurosurgical centres. Current therapies for prevention of CI are still debatable and selective usage among high-risk patients is advised. These factors necessitate a simple prediction model for identifying patients in the high risk group to initiate early preventive treatment of CI. METHODS: Patients with anterior circulation aneurysm rupture who underwent surgical clipping were included. Demographic data and factors related to CI were collected to determine significance and were used to develop VINODH score (VS). RESULTS: Two hundred patients were included with a median age of 51 years old. Multivariate analysis proved only four predictors were significant (P < 0.01) for developing CI. These predictors were used for the development of VS which was named after the main author and the model’s sensitivity was 79.0% and specificity was 83.0%. This highly predictive score (receiver operating characteristic [ROC]: 0.902) was internally validated. CONCLUSION: VS is a reliable tool for early identification of patients at risk of CI after aneurysmal SAH.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9036933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90369332022-05-05 Risk Prediction of Cerebral Infarction after Anterior Circulation Aneurysm Rupture in an Under-Equipped Centre VINODH, Vayara Perumall GHANI, Abdul Rahman Izaini KANDASAMY, Regunath SELLAMUTHU, Pulivendhan ZENIAN, Mohd Sofan KEOWMANI, Thamron Malays J Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Morbidity and mortality is high among aneurysm rupture patients. Despite surviving the initial rupture, morbidity is high as they suffer from vasospasm and cerebral infarction (CI). Most prediction tools for CI after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) are complex and are not routinely available in all neurosurgical centres. Current therapies for prevention of CI are still debatable and selective usage among high-risk patients is advised. These factors necessitate a simple prediction model for identifying patients in the high risk group to initiate early preventive treatment of CI. METHODS: Patients with anterior circulation aneurysm rupture who underwent surgical clipping were included. Demographic data and factors related to CI were collected to determine significance and were used to develop VINODH score (VS). RESULTS: Two hundred patients were included with a median age of 51 years old. Multivariate analysis proved only four predictors were significant (P < 0.01) for developing CI. These predictors were used for the development of VS which was named after the main author and the model’s sensitivity was 79.0% and specificity was 83.0%. This highly predictive score (receiver operating characteristic [ROC]: 0.902) was internally validated. CONCLUSION: VS is a reliable tool for early identification of patients at risk of CI after aneurysmal SAH. Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia 2022-04 2022-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9036933/ /pubmed/35528813 http://dx.doi.org/10.21315/mjms2022.29.2.5 Text en © Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Original Article
VINODH, Vayara Perumall
GHANI, Abdul Rahman Izaini
KANDASAMY, Regunath
SELLAMUTHU, Pulivendhan
ZENIAN, Mohd Sofan
KEOWMANI, Thamron
Risk Prediction of Cerebral Infarction after Anterior Circulation Aneurysm Rupture in an Under-Equipped Centre
title Risk Prediction of Cerebral Infarction after Anterior Circulation Aneurysm Rupture in an Under-Equipped Centre
title_full Risk Prediction of Cerebral Infarction after Anterior Circulation Aneurysm Rupture in an Under-Equipped Centre
title_fullStr Risk Prediction of Cerebral Infarction after Anterior Circulation Aneurysm Rupture in an Under-Equipped Centre
title_full_unstemmed Risk Prediction of Cerebral Infarction after Anterior Circulation Aneurysm Rupture in an Under-Equipped Centre
title_short Risk Prediction of Cerebral Infarction after Anterior Circulation Aneurysm Rupture in an Under-Equipped Centre
title_sort risk prediction of cerebral infarction after anterior circulation aneurysm rupture in an under-equipped centre
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9036933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35528813
http://dx.doi.org/10.21315/mjms2022.29.2.5
work_keys_str_mv AT vinodhvayaraperumall riskpredictionofcerebralinfarctionafteranteriorcirculationaneurysmruptureinanunderequippedcentre
AT ghaniabdulrahmanizaini riskpredictionofcerebralinfarctionafteranteriorcirculationaneurysmruptureinanunderequippedcentre
AT kandasamyregunath riskpredictionofcerebralinfarctionafteranteriorcirculationaneurysmruptureinanunderequippedcentre
AT sellamuthupulivendhan riskpredictionofcerebralinfarctionafteranteriorcirculationaneurysmruptureinanunderequippedcentre
AT zenianmohdsofan riskpredictionofcerebralinfarctionafteranteriorcirculationaneurysmruptureinanunderequippedcentre
AT keowmanithamron riskpredictionofcerebralinfarctionafteranteriorcirculationaneurysmruptureinanunderequippedcentre