Cargando…

Prediction Models for Prognosis of Femoral Neck–Fracture Patients 6 Months after Total Hip Arthroplasty

PURPOSE: To establish prediction models for 6-month prognosis in femoral neck–fracture patients receiving total hip arthroplasty (THA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 182 computed tomography image pairs from 85 patients were collected and divided into a training set (n=127) and testing set (n=55)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Xiaofeng, Xiao, Cong, Xie, Zhuocheng, Liu, Lijuan, Chen, Yinhua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9037899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35480995
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S347425
_version_ 1784693817731973120
author Zheng, Xiaofeng
Xiao, Cong
Xie, Zhuocheng
Liu, Lijuan
Chen, Yinhua
author_facet Zheng, Xiaofeng
Xiao, Cong
Xie, Zhuocheng
Liu, Lijuan
Chen, Yinhua
author_sort Zheng, Xiaofeng
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To establish prediction models for 6-month prognosis in femoral neck–fracture patients receiving total hip arthroplasty (THA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 182 computed tomography image pairs from 85 patients were collected and divided into a training set (n=127) and testing set (n=55). Least absolute shrinkage–selection operator regression was used for selecting optimal predictors. A random-forest algorithm was used to establish the prediction models, which were evaluated for accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: The best model in this study was constructed based on demographic data, preoperative laboratory indicators, and three preoperative radiomic features. In the random-forest model, activated partial thromboplastin time, a preoperative radiomic feature (maximum diameter), and fibrinogen were important variables correlating with patient outcomes. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy in the training set were 0.986 (95% CI 0.971–1), 0.925 (95% CI 0.862–0.988), 0.983 (95% CI 0.951–1.016), 0.984 (95% CI 0.953–1.014), 0.922 (95% CI 0.856–0.988), and 0.953 (95% CI 0.916–0.990), respectively. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy in the testing set were 0.949 (95% CI 0.885–1), 0.767 (95% CI 0.615–0.918), 1 (95% CI 1–1), 1 (95% CI 1–1), 0.781 (95% CI 0.638–0.924), and 0.873 (95% CI 0.785–0.961), respectively. CONCLUSION: The model based on demographic, preoperative clinical, and preoperative radiomic data showed the best predictive ability for 6-month prognosis in the femoral neck–fracture patients receiving THA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9037899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90378992022-04-26 Prediction Models for Prognosis of Femoral Neck–Fracture Patients 6 Months after Total Hip Arthroplasty Zheng, Xiaofeng Xiao, Cong Xie, Zhuocheng Liu, Lijuan Chen, Yinhua Int J Gen Med Original Research PURPOSE: To establish prediction models for 6-month prognosis in femoral neck–fracture patients receiving total hip arthroplasty (THA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 182 computed tomography image pairs from 85 patients were collected and divided into a training set (n=127) and testing set (n=55). Least absolute shrinkage–selection operator regression was used for selecting optimal predictors. A random-forest algorithm was used to establish the prediction models, which were evaluated for accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: The best model in this study was constructed based on demographic data, preoperative laboratory indicators, and three preoperative radiomic features. In the random-forest model, activated partial thromboplastin time, a preoperative radiomic feature (maximum diameter), and fibrinogen were important variables correlating with patient outcomes. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy in the training set were 0.986 (95% CI 0.971–1), 0.925 (95% CI 0.862–0.988), 0.983 (95% CI 0.951–1.016), 0.984 (95% CI 0.953–1.014), 0.922 (95% CI 0.856–0.988), and 0.953 (95% CI 0.916–0.990), respectively. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy in the testing set were 0.949 (95% CI 0.885–1), 0.767 (95% CI 0.615–0.918), 1 (95% CI 1–1), 1 (95% CI 1–1), 0.781 (95% CI 0.638–0.924), and 0.873 (95% CI 0.785–0.961), respectively. CONCLUSION: The model based on demographic, preoperative clinical, and preoperative radiomic data showed the best predictive ability for 6-month prognosis in the femoral neck–fracture patients receiving THA. Dove 2022-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9037899/ /pubmed/35480995 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S347425 Text en © 2022 Zheng et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Zheng, Xiaofeng
Xiao, Cong
Xie, Zhuocheng
Liu, Lijuan
Chen, Yinhua
Prediction Models for Prognosis of Femoral Neck–Fracture Patients 6 Months after Total Hip Arthroplasty
title Prediction Models for Prognosis of Femoral Neck–Fracture Patients 6 Months after Total Hip Arthroplasty
title_full Prediction Models for Prognosis of Femoral Neck–Fracture Patients 6 Months after Total Hip Arthroplasty
title_fullStr Prediction Models for Prognosis of Femoral Neck–Fracture Patients 6 Months after Total Hip Arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Prediction Models for Prognosis of Femoral Neck–Fracture Patients 6 Months after Total Hip Arthroplasty
title_short Prediction Models for Prognosis of Femoral Neck–Fracture Patients 6 Months after Total Hip Arthroplasty
title_sort prediction models for prognosis of femoral neck–fracture patients 6 months after total hip arthroplasty
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9037899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35480995
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S347425
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengxiaofeng predictionmodelsforprognosisoffemoralneckfracturepatients6monthsaftertotalhiparthroplasty
AT xiaocong predictionmodelsforprognosisoffemoralneckfracturepatients6monthsaftertotalhiparthroplasty
AT xiezhuocheng predictionmodelsforprognosisoffemoralneckfracturepatients6monthsaftertotalhiparthroplasty
AT liulijuan predictionmodelsforprognosisoffemoralneckfracturepatients6monthsaftertotalhiparthroplasty
AT chenyinhua predictionmodelsforprognosisoffemoralneckfracturepatients6monthsaftertotalhiparthroplasty