Cargando…
Considerations in evaluating equipment-free blood culture bottles: A short protocol for use in low-resource settings
Use of equipment-free, “manual” blood cultures is still widespread in low-resource settings, as requirements for implementation of automated systems are often not met. Quality of manual blood culture bottles currently on the market, however, is usually unknown. An acceptable quality in terms of yiel...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9037908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35468169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267491 |
_version_ | 1784693819957051392 |
---|---|
author | Ombelet, Sien Natale, Alessandra Ronat, Jean-Baptiste Vandenberg, Olivier Jacobs, Jan Hardy, Liselotte |
author_facet | Ombelet, Sien Natale, Alessandra Ronat, Jean-Baptiste Vandenberg, Olivier Jacobs, Jan Hardy, Liselotte |
author_sort | Ombelet, Sien |
collection | PubMed |
description | Use of equipment-free, “manual” blood cultures is still widespread in low-resource settings, as requirements for implementation of automated systems are often not met. Quality of manual blood culture bottles currently on the market, however, is usually unknown. An acceptable quality in terms of yield and speed of growth can be ensured by evaluating the bottles using simulated blood cultures. In these experiments, bottles from different systems are inoculated in parallel with blood and a known quantity of bacteria. Based on literature review and personal experiences, we propose a short and practical protocol for an efficient evaluation of manual blood culture bottles, aimed at research or reference laboratories in low-resource settings. Recommendations include: (1) practical equivalence of horse blood and human blood; (2) a diverse selection of 10 to 20 micro-organisms to be tested (both slow- and fast-growing reference organisms); (3) evaluation of both adult and pediatric bottle formulations and blood volumes; (4) a minimum sample size of 120 bottles per bottle type; (5) a formal assessment of usability. Different testing scenarios for increasing levels of reliability are provided, along with practical tools such as worksheets and surveys that can be used by laboratories wishing to evaluate manual blood culture bottles. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9037908 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90379082022-04-26 Considerations in evaluating equipment-free blood culture bottles: A short protocol for use in low-resource settings Ombelet, Sien Natale, Alessandra Ronat, Jean-Baptiste Vandenberg, Olivier Jacobs, Jan Hardy, Liselotte PLoS One Lab Protocol Use of equipment-free, “manual” blood cultures is still widespread in low-resource settings, as requirements for implementation of automated systems are often not met. Quality of manual blood culture bottles currently on the market, however, is usually unknown. An acceptable quality in terms of yield and speed of growth can be ensured by evaluating the bottles using simulated blood cultures. In these experiments, bottles from different systems are inoculated in parallel with blood and a known quantity of bacteria. Based on literature review and personal experiences, we propose a short and practical protocol for an efficient evaluation of manual blood culture bottles, aimed at research or reference laboratories in low-resource settings. Recommendations include: (1) practical equivalence of horse blood and human blood; (2) a diverse selection of 10 to 20 micro-organisms to be tested (both slow- and fast-growing reference organisms); (3) evaluation of both adult and pediatric bottle formulations and blood volumes; (4) a minimum sample size of 120 bottles per bottle type; (5) a formal assessment of usability. Different testing scenarios for increasing levels of reliability are provided, along with practical tools such as worksheets and surveys that can be used by laboratories wishing to evaluate manual blood culture bottles. Public Library of Science 2022-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9037908/ /pubmed/35468169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267491 Text en © 2022 Ombelet et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Lab Protocol Ombelet, Sien Natale, Alessandra Ronat, Jean-Baptiste Vandenberg, Olivier Jacobs, Jan Hardy, Liselotte Considerations in evaluating equipment-free blood culture bottles: A short protocol for use in low-resource settings |
title | Considerations in evaluating equipment-free blood culture bottles: A short protocol for use in low-resource settings |
title_full | Considerations in evaluating equipment-free blood culture bottles: A short protocol for use in low-resource settings |
title_fullStr | Considerations in evaluating equipment-free blood culture bottles: A short protocol for use in low-resource settings |
title_full_unstemmed | Considerations in evaluating equipment-free blood culture bottles: A short protocol for use in low-resource settings |
title_short | Considerations in evaluating equipment-free blood culture bottles: A short protocol for use in low-resource settings |
title_sort | considerations in evaluating equipment-free blood culture bottles: a short protocol for use in low-resource settings |
topic | Lab Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9037908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35468169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267491 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ombeletsien considerationsinevaluatingequipmentfreebloodculturebottlesashortprotocolforuseinlowresourcesettings AT natalealessandra considerationsinevaluatingequipmentfreebloodculturebottlesashortprotocolforuseinlowresourcesettings AT ronatjeanbaptiste considerationsinevaluatingequipmentfreebloodculturebottlesashortprotocolforuseinlowresourcesettings AT vandenbergolivier considerationsinevaluatingequipmentfreebloodculturebottlesashortprotocolforuseinlowresourcesettings AT jacobsjan considerationsinevaluatingequipmentfreebloodculturebottlesashortprotocolforuseinlowresourcesettings AT hardyliselotte considerationsinevaluatingequipmentfreebloodculturebottlesashortprotocolforuseinlowresourcesettings |