Cargando…

Considerations in evaluating equipment-free blood culture bottles: A short protocol for use in low-resource settings

Use of equipment-free, “manual” blood cultures is still widespread in low-resource settings, as requirements for implementation of automated systems are often not met. Quality of manual blood culture bottles currently on the market, however, is usually unknown. An acceptable quality in terms of yiel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ombelet, Sien, Natale, Alessandra, Ronat, Jean-Baptiste, Vandenberg, Olivier, Jacobs, Jan, Hardy, Liselotte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9037908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35468169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267491
_version_ 1784693819957051392
author Ombelet, Sien
Natale, Alessandra
Ronat, Jean-Baptiste
Vandenberg, Olivier
Jacobs, Jan
Hardy, Liselotte
author_facet Ombelet, Sien
Natale, Alessandra
Ronat, Jean-Baptiste
Vandenberg, Olivier
Jacobs, Jan
Hardy, Liselotte
author_sort Ombelet, Sien
collection PubMed
description Use of equipment-free, “manual” blood cultures is still widespread in low-resource settings, as requirements for implementation of automated systems are often not met. Quality of manual blood culture bottles currently on the market, however, is usually unknown. An acceptable quality in terms of yield and speed of growth can be ensured by evaluating the bottles using simulated blood cultures. In these experiments, bottles from different systems are inoculated in parallel with blood and a known quantity of bacteria. Based on literature review and personal experiences, we propose a short and practical protocol for an efficient evaluation of manual blood culture bottles, aimed at research or reference laboratories in low-resource settings. Recommendations include: (1) practical equivalence of horse blood and human blood; (2) a diverse selection of 10 to 20 micro-organisms to be tested (both slow- and fast-growing reference organisms); (3) evaluation of both adult and pediatric bottle formulations and blood volumes; (4) a minimum sample size of 120 bottles per bottle type; (5) a formal assessment of usability. Different testing scenarios for increasing levels of reliability are provided, along with practical tools such as worksheets and surveys that can be used by laboratories wishing to evaluate manual blood culture bottles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9037908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90379082022-04-26 Considerations in evaluating equipment-free blood culture bottles: A short protocol for use in low-resource settings Ombelet, Sien Natale, Alessandra Ronat, Jean-Baptiste Vandenberg, Olivier Jacobs, Jan Hardy, Liselotte PLoS One Lab Protocol Use of equipment-free, “manual” blood cultures is still widespread in low-resource settings, as requirements for implementation of automated systems are often not met. Quality of manual blood culture bottles currently on the market, however, is usually unknown. An acceptable quality in terms of yield and speed of growth can be ensured by evaluating the bottles using simulated blood cultures. In these experiments, bottles from different systems are inoculated in parallel with blood and a known quantity of bacteria. Based on literature review and personal experiences, we propose a short and practical protocol for an efficient evaluation of manual blood culture bottles, aimed at research or reference laboratories in low-resource settings. Recommendations include: (1) practical equivalence of horse blood and human blood; (2) a diverse selection of 10 to 20 micro-organisms to be tested (both slow- and fast-growing reference organisms); (3) evaluation of both adult and pediatric bottle formulations and blood volumes; (4) a minimum sample size of 120 bottles per bottle type; (5) a formal assessment of usability. Different testing scenarios for increasing levels of reliability are provided, along with practical tools such as worksheets and surveys that can be used by laboratories wishing to evaluate manual blood culture bottles. Public Library of Science 2022-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9037908/ /pubmed/35468169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267491 Text en © 2022 Ombelet et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Lab Protocol
Ombelet, Sien
Natale, Alessandra
Ronat, Jean-Baptiste
Vandenberg, Olivier
Jacobs, Jan
Hardy, Liselotte
Considerations in evaluating equipment-free blood culture bottles: A short protocol for use in low-resource settings
title Considerations in evaluating equipment-free blood culture bottles: A short protocol for use in low-resource settings
title_full Considerations in evaluating equipment-free blood culture bottles: A short protocol for use in low-resource settings
title_fullStr Considerations in evaluating equipment-free blood culture bottles: A short protocol for use in low-resource settings
title_full_unstemmed Considerations in evaluating equipment-free blood culture bottles: A short protocol for use in low-resource settings
title_short Considerations in evaluating equipment-free blood culture bottles: A short protocol for use in low-resource settings
title_sort considerations in evaluating equipment-free blood culture bottles: a short protocol for use in low-resource settings
topic Lab Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9037908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35468169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267491
work_keys_str_mv AT ombeletsien considerationsinevaluatingequipmentfreebloodculturebottlesashortprotocolforuseinlowresourcesettings
AT natalealessandra considerationsinevaluatingequipmentfreebloodculturebottlesashortprotocolforuseinlowresourcesettings
AT ronatjeanbaptiste considerationsinevaluatingequipmentfreebloodculturebottlesashortprotocolforuseinlowresourcesettings
AT vandenbergolivier considerationsinevaluatingequipmentfreebloodculturebottlesashortprotocolforuseinlowresourcesettings
AT jacobsjan considerationsinevaluatingequipmentfreebloodculturebottlesashortprotocolforuseinlowresourcesettings
AT hardyliselotte considerationsinevaluatingequipmentfreebloodculturebottlesashortprotocolforuseinlowresourcesettings