Cargando…

B(12)X(11)(H(2))(−): exploring the limits of isotopologue selectivity of hydrogen adsorption

We study the isotopologue-selective binding of dihydrogen at the undercoordinated boron site of B(12)X(11)(−) (X = H, F, Cl, Br, I, CN) using ab initio quantum chemistry. With a Gibbs free energy of H(2) attachment reaching up to 80 kJ mol(−1) (ΔG at 300 K for X = CN), these sites are even more attr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wulf, Toshiki, Warneke, Jonas, Heine, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9038111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35478551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1ra06322g
_version_ 1784693859781967872
author Wulf, Toshiki
Warneke, Jonas
Heine, Thomas
author_facet Wulf, Toshiki
Warneke, Jonas
Heine, Thomas
author_sort Wulf, Toshiki
collection PubMed
description We study the isotopologue-selective binding of dihydrogen at the undercoordinated boron site of B(12)X(11)(−) (X = H, F, Cl, Br, I, CN) using ab initio quantum chemistry. With a Gibbs free energy of H(2) attachment reaching up to 80 kJ mol(−1) (ΔG at 300 K for X = CN), these sites are even more attractive than most undercoordinated metal centers studied so far. We thus believe that they can serve as an edge case close to the upper limit of isotopologue-selective H(2) adsorption sites. Differences of the zero-point energy of attachment average 5.0 kJ mol(−1) between D(2) and H(2) and 2.7 kJ mol(−1) between HD and H(2), resulting in hypothetical isotopologue selectivities as high as 2.0 and 1.5, respectively, even at 300 K. Interestingly, even though attachment energies vary substantially according to the chemical nature of X, isotopologue selectivities remain very similar. We find that the H–H activation is so strong that it likely results in the instantaneous heterolytic dissociation of H(2) in all cases (except, possibly, for X = H), highlighting the extremely electrophilic nature of B(12)X(11)(−) despite its negative charge. Unfortunately, this high reactivity also makes B(12)X(11)(−) unsuitable for practical application in the field of dihydrogen isotopologue separation. Thus, this example stresses the two-edged nature of strong H(2) affinity, yielding a higher isotopologue selectivity on the one hand but risking dissociation on the other, and helps define a window of adsorption energies into which a material for selective adsorption near room temperature should ideally fall.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9038111
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90381112022-04-26 B(12)X(11)(H(2))(−): exploring the limits of isotopologue selectivity of hydrogen adsorption Wulf, Toshiki Warneke, Jonas Heine, Thomas RSC Adv Chemistry We study the isotopologue-selective binding of dihydrogen at the undercoordinated boron site of B(12)X(11)(−) (X = H, F, Cl, Br, I, CN) using ab initio quantum chemistry. With a Gibbs free energy of H(2) attachment reaching up to 80 kJ mol(−1) (ΔG at 300 K for X = CN), these sites are even more attractive than most undercoordinated metal centers studied so far. We thus believe that they can serve as an edge case close to the upper limit of isotopologue-selective H(2) adsorption sites. Differences of the zero-point energy of attachment average 5.0 kJ mol(−1) between D(2) and H(2) and 2.7 kJ mol(−1) between HD and H(2), resulting in hypothetical isotopologue selectivities as high as 2.0 and 1.5, respectively, even at 300 K. Interestingly, even though attachment energies vary substantially according to the chemical nature of X, isotopologue selectivities remain very similar. We find that the H–H activation is so strong that it likely results in the instantaneous heterolytic dissociation of H(2) in all cases (except, possibly, for X = H), highlighting the extremely electrophilic nature of B(12)X(11)(−) despite its negative charge. Unfortunately, this high reactivity also makes B(12)X(11)(−) unsuitable for practical application in the field of dihydrogen isotopologue separation. Thus, this example stresses the two-edged nature of strong H(2) affinity, yielding a higher isotopologue selectivity on the one hand but risking dissociation on the other, and helps define a window of adsorption energies into which a material for selective adsorption near room temperature should ideally fall. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9038111/ /pubmed/35478551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1ra06322g Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Chemistry
Wulf, Toshiki
Warneke, Jonas
Heine, Thomas
B(12)X(11)(H(2))(−): exploring the limits of isotopologue selectivity of hydrogen adsorption
title B(12)X(11)(H(2))(−): exploring the limits of isotopologue selectivity of hydrogen adsorption
title_full B(12)X(11)(H(2))(−): exploring the limits of isotopologue selectivity of hydrogen adsorption
title_fullStr B(12)X(11)(H(2))(−): exploring the limits of isotopologue selectivity of hydrogen adsorption
title_full_unstemmed B(12)X(11)(H(2))(−): exploring the limits of isotopologue selectivity of hydrogen adsorption
title_short B(12)X(11)(H(2))(−): exploring the limits of isotopologue selectivity of hydrogen adsorption
title_sort b(12)x(11)(h(2))(−): exploring the limits of isotopologue selectivity of hydrogen adsorption
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9038111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35478551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1ra06322g
work_keys_str_mv AT wulftoshiki b12x11h2exploringthelimitsofisotopologueselectivityofhydrogenadsorption
AT warnekejonas b12x11h2exploringthelimitsofisotopologueselectivityofhydrogenadsorption
AT heinethomas b12x11h2exploringthelimitsofisotopologueselectivityofhydrogenadsorption