Cargando…
Comparison between the Severity Scoring Systems A-DROP and CURB-65 for Predicting Safe Discharge from the Emergency Department in Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia
BACKGROUND: In most community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) treatment guidelines, the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) and CURB-65 are used as prognostic tools. Recently, simpler and more effective predictive tools for CAP treatment, such as the A-DROP scoring system, have been developed. However, no study...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9038425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35480967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6391141 |
_version_ | 1784693918071259136 |
---|---|
author | Limapichat, Thanya Supavajana, Suvanun |
author_facet | Limapichat, Thanya Supavajana, Suvanun |
author_sort | Limapichat, Thanya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In most community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) treatment guidelines, the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) and CURB-65 are used as prognostic tools. Recently, simpler and more effective predictive tools for CAP treatment, such as the A-DROP scoring system, have been developed. However, no study has performed a comparative evaluation to identify the superior tool for predicting when patients can be discharged safely. OBJECTIVES: To compare the performances of A-DROP and CURB-65, simple predictive tools for CAP, based on 30-day death rates and 72-hour revisit rates for CAP following discharge from the emergency department (ED). METHOD: This single-center retrospective observational study enrolled patients who were at least 18 years old and diagnosed with CAP at the Songklanagarind Hospital ED from January 2015 to April 2021. Following a severity assessment using the A-DROP and CURB-65 scoring systems, the 30-day mortality rates and 72-hour revisit rates after discharge from the ED were compared. RESULTS: A total of 408 patients were enrolled in this study. Six (1.47%) died within 30 days after presentation, whereas 29 (7.1%) returned to the ED within 72 hours after discharge. Most patients (72%) who revisited the ED were over the age of 65 years. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the prediction of 30-day mortality were 0.756 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.526–0.987) and 0.808 (95% CI: 0.647–0.970) for A-DROP and CURB-65, respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the prediction of 72-hour revisit were 0.617 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.507–0.728) and 0.639 (95% CI: 0.536–0.743) for A-DROP and CURB-65, respectively. CONCLUSION: A-DROP and CURB-65 yield similar results and can be used to assess low-risk patients with CAP for discharge from the ED. Older patients, even those with low-risk scores, should be particularly considered for admission to a short-term observation unit or ward. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9038425 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90384252022-04-26 Comparison between the Severity Scoring Systems A-DROP and CURB-65 for Predicting Safe Discharge from the Emergency Department in Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia Limapichat, Thanya Supavajana, Suvanun Emerg Med Int Research Article BACKGROUND: In most community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) treatment guidelines, the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) and CURB-65 are used as prognostic tools. Recently, simpler and more effective predictive tools for CAP treatment, such as the A-DROP scoring system, have been developed. However, no study has performed a comparative evaluation to identify the superior tool for predicting when patients can be discharged safely. OBJECTIVES: To compare the performances of A-DROP and CURB-65, simple predictive tools for CAP, based on 30-day death rates and 72-hour revisit rates for CAP following discharge from the emergency department (ED). METHOD: This single-center retrospective observational study enrolled patients who were at least 18 years old and diagnosed with CAP at the Songklanagarind Hospital ED from January 2015 to April 2021. Following a severity assessment using the A-DROP and CURB-65 scoring systems, the 30-day mortality rates and 72-hour revisit rates after discharge from the ED were compared. RESULTS: A total of 408 patients were enrolled in this study. Six (1.47%) died within 30 days after presentation, whereas 29 (7.1%) returned to the ED within 72 hours after discharge. Most patients (72%) who revisited the ED were over the age of 65 years. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the prediction of 30-day mortality were 0.756 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.526–0.987) and 0.808 (95% CI: 0.647–0.970) for A-DROP and CURB-65, respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the prediction of 72-hour revisit were 0.617 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.507–0.728) and 0.639 (95% CI: 0.536–0.743) for A-DROP and CURB-65, respectively. CONCLUSION: A-DROP and CURB-65 yield similar results and can be used to assess low-risk patients with CAP for discharge from the ED. Older patients, even those with low-risk scores, should be particularly considered for admission to a short-term observation unit or ward. Hindawi 2022-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9038425/ /pubmed/35480967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6391141 Text en Copyright © 2022 Thanya Limapichat and Suvanun Supavajana. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Limapichat, Thanya Supavajana, Suvanun Comparison between the Severity Scoring Systems A-DROP and CURB-65 for Predicting Safe Discharge from the Emergency Department in Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia |
title | Comparison between the Severity Scoring Systems A-DROP and CURB-65 for Predicting Safe Discharge from the Emergency Department in Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia |
title_full | Comparison between the Severity Scoring Systems A-DROP and CURB-65 for Predicting Safe Discharge from the Emergency Department in Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia |
title_fullStr | Comparison between the Severity Scoring Systems A-DROP and CURB-65 for Predicting Safe Discharge from the Emergency Department in Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between the Severity Scoring Systems A-DROP and CURB-65 for Predicting Safe Discharge from the Emergency Department in Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia |
title_short | Comparison between the Severity Scoring Systems A-DROP and CURB-65 for Predicting Safe Discharge from the Emergency Department in Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia |
title_sort | comparison between the severity scoring systems a-drop and curb-65 for predicting safe discharge from the emergency department in patients with community-acquired pneumonia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9038425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35480967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6391141 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT limapichatthanya comparisonbetweentheseverityscoringsystemsadropandcurb65forpredictingsafedischargefromtheemergencydepartmentinpatientswithcommunityacquiredpneumonia AT supavajanasuvanun comparisonbetweentheseverityscoringsystemsadropandcurb65forpredictingsafedischargefromtheemergencydepartmentinpatientswithcommunityacquiredpneumonia |