Cargando…

Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: updated joint guidelines between the ESGAR, EAES, EFISDS and ESGE

ABSTRACT: MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Primary investigation of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder should be with abdominal ultrasound. Routine use of other imaging modalities is not recommended presently, but further research is needed. In centres with appropriate expertise and resources, alternative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foley, Kieran G., Lahaye, Max J., Thoeni, Ruedi F., Soltes, Marek, Dewhurst, Catherine, Barbu, Sorin Traian, Vashist, Yogesh K., Rafaelsen, Søren Rafael, Arvanitakis, Marianna, Perinel, Julie, Wiles, Rebecca, Roberts, Stuart Ashley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9038818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34918177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08384-w
_version_ 1784693986892447744
author Foley, Kieran G.
Lahaye, Max J.
Thoeni, Ruedi F.
Soltes, Marek
Dewhurst, Catherine
Barbu, Sorin Traian
Vashist, Yogesh K.
Rafaelsen, Søren Rafael
Arvanitakis, Marianna
Perinel, Julie
Wiles, Rebecca
Roberts, Stuart Ashley
author_facet Foley, Kieran G.
Lahaye, Max J.
Thoeni, Ruedi F.
Soltes, Marek
Dewhurst, Catherine
Barbu, Sorin Traian
Vashist, Yogesh K.
Rafaelsen, Søren Rafael
Arvanitakis, Marianna
Perinel, Julie
Wiles, Rebecca
Roberts, Stuart Ashley
author_sort Foley, Kieran G.
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Primary investigation of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder should be with abdominal ultrasound. Routine use of other imaging modalities is not recommended presently, but further research is needed. In centres with appropriate expertise and resources, alternative imaging modalities (such as contrast-enhanced and endoscopic ultrasound) may be useful to aid decision-making in difficult cases. Strong recommendation, low–moderate quality evidence. 2. Cholecystectomy is recommended in patients with polypoid lesions of the gallbladder measuring 10 mm or more, providing the patient is fit for, and accepts, surgery. Multidisciplinary discussion may be employed to assess perceived individual risk of malignancy. Strong recommendation, low-quality evidence. 3. Cholecystectomy is suggested for patients with a polypoid lesion and symptoms potentially attributable to the gallbladder if no alternative cause for the patient’s symptoms is demonstrated and the patient is fit for, and accepts, surgery. The patient should be counselled regarding the benefit of cholecystectomy versus the risk of persistent symptoms. Strong recommendation, low-quality evidence. 4. If the patient has a 6–9 mm polypoid lesion of the gallbladder and one or more risk factors for malignancy, cholecystectomy is recommended if the patient is fit for, and accepts, surgery. These risk factors are as follows: age more than 60 years, history of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), Asian ethnicity, sessile polypoid lesion (including focal gallbladder wall thickening > 4 mm). Strong recommendation, low–moderate quality evidence. 5. If the patient has either no risk factors for malignancy and a gallbladder polypoid lesion of 6–9 mm, or risk factors for malignancy and a gallbladder polypoid lesion 5 mm or less, follow-up ultrasound of the gallbladder is recommended at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. Follow-up should be discontinued after 2 years in the absence of growth. Moderate strength recommendation, moderate-quality evidence. 6. If the patient has no risk factors for malignancy, and a gallbladder polypoid lesion of 5 mm or less, follow-up is not required. Strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence. 7. If during follow-up the gallbladder polypoid lesion grows to 10 mm, then cholecystectomy is advised. If the polypoid lesion grows by 2 mm or more within the 2-year follow-up period, then the current size of the polypoid lesion should be considered along with patient risk factors. Multidisciplinary discussion may be employed to decide whether continuation of monitoring, or cholecystectomy, is necessary. Moderate strength recommendation, moderate-quality evidence. 8. If during follow-up the gallbladder polypoid lesion disappears, then monitoring can be discontinued. Strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence. SOURCE AND SCOPE: These guidelines are an update of the 2017 recommendations developed between the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR), European Association for Endoscopic Surgery and other Interventional Techniques (EAES), International Society of Digestive Surgery–European Federation (EFISDS) and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). A targeted literature search was performed to discover recent evidence concerning the management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps. The changes within these updated guidelines were formulated after consideration of the latest evidence by a group of international experts. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was adopted to define the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence. KEY POINT: • These recommendations update the 2017 European guidelines regarding the management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9038818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90388182022-05-07 Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: updated joint guidelines between the ESGAR, EAES, EFISDS and ESGE Foley, Kieran G. Lahaye, Max J. Thoeni, Ruedi F. Soltes, Marek Dewhurst, Catherine Barbu, Sorin Traian Vashist, Yogesh K. Rafaelsen, Søren Rafael Arvanitakis, Marianna Perinel, Julie Wiles, Rebecca Roberts, Stuart Ashley Eur Radiol Hepatobiliary-Pancreas ABSTRACT: MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Primary investigation of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder should be with abdominal ultrasound. Routine use of other imaging modalities is not recommended presently, but further research is needed. In centres with appropriate expertise and resources, alternative imaging modalities (such as contrast-enhanced and endoscopic ultrasound) may be useful to aid decision-making in difficult cases. Strong recommendation, low–moderate quality evidence. 2. Cholecystectomy is recommended in patients with polypoid lesions of the gallbladder measuring 10 mm or more, providing the patient is fit for, and accepts, surgery. Multidisciplinary discussion may be employed to assess perceived individual risk of malignancy. Strong recommendation, low-quality evidence. 3. Cholecystectomy is suggested for patients with a polypoid lesion and symptoms potentially attributable to the gallbladder if no alternative cause for the patient’s symptoms is demonstrated and the patient is fit for, and accepts, surgery. The patient should be counselled regarding the benefit of cholecystectomy versus the risk of persistent symptoms. Strong recommendation, low-quality evidence. 4. If the patient has a 6–9 mm polypoid lesion of the gallbladder and one or more risk factors for malignancy, cholecystectomy is recommended if the patient is fit for, and accepts, surgery. These risk factors are as follows: age more than 60 years, history of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), Asian ethnicity, sessile polypoid lesion (including focal gallbladder wall thickening > 4 mm). Strong recommendation, low–moderate quality evidence. 5. If the patient has either no risk factors for malignancy and a gallbladder polypoid lesion of 6–9 mm, or risk factors for malignancy and a gallbladder polypoid lesion 5 mm or less, follow-up ultrasound of the gallbladder is recommended at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. Follow-up should be discontinued after 2 years in the absence of growth. Moderate strength recommendation, moderate-quality evidence. 6. If the patient has no risk factors for malignancy, and a gallbladder polypoid lesion of 5 mm or less, follow-up is not required. Strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence. 7. If during follow-up the gallbladder polypoid lesion grows to 10 mm, then cholecystectomy is advised. If the polypoid lesion grows by 2 mm or more within the 2-year follow-up period, then the current size of the polypoid lesion should be considered along with patient risk factors. Multidisciplinary discussion may be employed to decide whether continuation of monitoring, or cholecystectomy, is necessary. Moderate strength recommendation, moderate-quality evidence. 8. If during follow-up the gallbladder polypoid lesion disappears, then monitoring can be discontinued. Strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence. SOURCE AND SCOPE: These guidelines are an update of the 2017 recommendations developed between the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR), European Association for Endoscopic Surgery and other Interventional Techniques (EAES), International Society of Digestive Surgery–European Federation (EFISDS) and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). A targeted literature search was performed to discover recent evidence concerning the management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps. The changes within these updated guidelines were formulated after consideration of the latest evidence by a group of international experts. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was adopted to define the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence. KEY POINT: • These recommendations update the 2017 European guidelines regarding the management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-12-17 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9038818/ /pubmed/34918177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08384-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Hepatobiliary-Pancreas
Foley, Kieran G.
Lahaye, Max J.
Thoeni, Ruedi F.
Soltes, Marek
Dewhurst, Catherine
Barbu, Sorin Traian
Vashist, Yogesh K.
Rafaelsen, Søren Rafael
Arvanitakis, Marianna
Perinel, Julie
Wiles, Rebecca
Roberts, Stuart Ashley
Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: updated joint guidelines between the ESGAR, EAES, EFISDS and ESGE
title Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: updated joint guidelines between the ESGAR, EAES, EFISDS and ESGE
title_full Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: updated joint guidelines between the ESGAR, EAES, EFISDS and ESGE
title_fullStr Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: updated joint guidelines between the ESGAR, EAES, EFISDS and ESGE
title_full_unstemmed Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: updated joint guidelines between the ESGAR, EAES, EFISDS and ESGE
title_short Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: updated joint guidelines between the ESGAR, EAES, EFISDS and ESGE
title_sort management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: updated joint guidelines between the esgar, eaes, efisds and esge
topic Hepatobiliary-Pancreas
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9038818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34918177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08384-w
work_keys_str_mv AT foleykierang managementandfollowupofgallbladderpolypsupdatedjointguidelinesbetweentheesgareaesefisdsandesge
AT lahayemaxj managementandfollowupofgallbladderpolypsupdatedjointguidelinesbetweentheesgareaesefisdsandesge
AT thoeniruedif managementandfollowupofgallbladderpolypsupdatedjointguidelinesbetweentheesgareaesefisdsandesge
AT soltesmarek managementandfollowupofgallbladderpolypsupdatedjointguidelinesbetweentheesgareaesefisdsandesge
AT dewhurstcatherine managementandfollowupofgallbladderpolypsupdatedjointguidelinesbetweentheesgareaesefisdsandesge
AT barbusorintraian managementandfollowupofgallbladderpolypsupdatedjointguidelinesbetweentheesgareaesefisdsandesge
AT vashistyogeshk managementandfollowupofgallbladderpolypsupdatedjointguidelinesbetweentheesgareaesefisdsandesge
AT rafaelsensørenrafael managementandfollowupofgallbladderpolypsupdatedjointguidelinesbetweentheesgareaesefisdsandesge
AT arvanitakismarianna managementandfollowupofgallbladderpolypsupdatedjointguidelinesbetweentheesgareaesefisdsandesge
AT perineljulie managementandfollowupofgallbladderpolypsupdatedjointguidelinesbetweentheesgareaesefisdsandesge
AT wilesrebecca managementandfollowupofgallbladderpolypsupdatedjointguidelinesbetweentheesgareaesefisdsandesge
AT robertsstuartashley managementandfollowupofgallbladderpolypsupdatedjointguidelinesbetweentheesgareaesefisdsandesge