Cargando…
Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: updated joint guidelines between the ESGAR, EAES, EFISDS and ESGE
ABSTRACT: MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Primary investigation of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder should be with abdominal ultrasound. Routine use of other imaging modalities is not recommended presently, but further research is needed. In centres with appropriate expertise and resources, alternative...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9038818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34918177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08384-w |
_version_ | 1784693986892447744 |
---|---|
author | Foley, Kieran G. Lahaye, Max J. Thoeni, Ruedi F. Soltes, Marek Dewhurst, Catherine Barbu, Sorin Traian Vashist, Yogesh K. Rafaelsen, Søren Rafael Arvanitakis, Marianna Perinel, Julie Wiles, Rebecca Roberts, Stuart Ashley |
author_facet | Foley, Kieran G. Lahaye, Max J. Thoeni, Ruedi F. Soltes, Marek Dewhurst, Catherine Barbu, Sorin Traian Vashist, Yogesh K. Rafaelsen, Søren Rafael Arvanitakis, Marianna Perinel, Julie Wiles, Rebecca Roberts, Stuart Ashley |
author_sort | Foley, Kieran G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | ABSTRACT: MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Primary investigation of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder should be with abdominal ultrasound. Routine use of other imaging modalities is not recommended presently, but further research is needed. In centres with appropriate expertise and resources, alternative imaging modalities (such as contrast-enhanced and endoscopic ultrasound) may be useful to aid decision-making in difficult cases. Strong recommendation, low–moderate quality evidence. 2. Cholecystectomy is recommended in patients with polypoid lesions of the gallbladder measuring 10 mm or more, providing the patient is fit for, and accepts, surgery. Multidisciplinary discussion may be employed to assess perceived individual risk of malignancy. Strong recommendation, low-quality evidence. 3. Cholecystectomy is suggested for patients with a polypoid lesion and symptoms potentially attributable to the gallbladder if no alternative cause for the patient’s symptoms is demonstrated and the patient is fit for, and accepts, surgery. The patient should be counselled regarding the benefit of cholecystectomy versus the risk of persistent symptoms. Strong recommendation, low-quality evidence. 4. If the patient has a 6–9 mm polypoid lesion of the gallbladder and one or more risk factors for malignancy, cholecystectomy is recommended if the patient is fit for, and accepts, surgery. These risk factors are as follows: age more than 60 years, history of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), Asian ethnicity, sessile polypoid lesion (including focal gallbladder wall thickening > 4 mm). Strong recommendation, low–moderate quality evidence. 5. If the patient has either no risk factors for malignancy and a gallbladder polypoid lesion of 6–9 mm, or risk factors for malignancy and a gallbladder polypoid lesion 5 mm or less, follow-up ultrasound of the gallbladder is recommended at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. Follow-up should be discontinued after 2 years in the absence of growth. Moderate strength recommendation, moderate-quality evidence. 6. If the patient has no risk factors for malignancy, and a gallbladder polypoid lesion of 5 mm or less, follow-up is not required. Strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence. 7. If during follow-up the gallbladder polypoid lesion grows to 10 mm, then cholecystectomy is advised. If the polypoid lesion grows by 2 mm or more within the 2-year follow-up period, then the current size of the polypoid lesion should be considered along with patient risk factors. Multidisciplinary discussion may be employed to decide whether continuation of monitoring, or cholecystectomy, is necessary. Moderate strength recommendation, moderate-quality evidence. 8. If during follow-up the gallbladder polypoid lesion disappears, then monitoring can be discontinued. Strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence. SOURCE AND SCOPE: These guidelines are an update of the 2017 recommendations developed between the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR), European Association for Endoscopic Surgery and other Interventional Techniques (EAES), International Society of Digestive Surgery–European Federation (EFISDS) and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). A targeted literature search was performed to discover recent evidence concerning the management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps. The changes within these updated guidelines were formulated after consideration of the latest evidence by a group of international experts. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was adopted to define the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence. KEY POINT: • These recommendations update the 2017 European guidelines regarding the management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9038818 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90388182022-05-07 Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: updated joint guidelines between the ESGAR, EAES, EFISDS and ESGE Foley, Kieran G. Lahaye, Max J. Thoeni, Ruedi F. Soltes, Marek Dewhurst, Catherine Barbu, Sorin Traian Vashist, Yogesh K. Rafaelsen, Søren Rafael Arvanitakis, Marianna Perinel, Julie Wiles, Rebecca Roberts, Stuart Ashley Eur Radiol Hepatobiliary-Pancreas ABSTRACT: MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Primary investigation of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder should be with abdominal ultrasound. Routine use of other imaging modalities is not recommended presently, but further research is needed. In centres with appropriate expertise and resources, alternative imaging modalities (such as contrast-enhanced and endoscopic ultrasound) may be useful to aid decision-making in difficult cases. Strong recommendation, low–moderate quality evidence. 2. Cholecystectomy is recommended in patients with polypoid lesions of the gallbladder measuring 10 mm or more, providing the patient is fit for, and accepts, surgery. Multidisciplinary discussion may be employed to assess perceived individual risk of malignancy. Strong recommendation, low-quality evidence. 3. Cholecystectomy is suggested for patients with a polypoid lesion and symptoms potentially attributable to the gallbladder if no alternative cause for the patient’s symptoms is demonstrated and the patient is fit for, and accepts, surgery. The patient should be counselled regarding the benefit of cholecystectomy versus the risk of persistent symptoms. Strong recommendation, low-quality evidence. 4. If the patient has a 6–9 mm polypoid lesion of the gallbladder and one or more risk factors for malignancy, cholecystectomy is recommended if the patient is fit for, and accepts, surgery. These risk factors are as follows: age more than 60 years, history of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), Asian ethnicity, sessile polypoid lesion (including focal gallbladder wall thickening > 4 mm). Strong recommendation, low–moderate quality evidence. 5. If the patient has either no risk factors for malignancy and a gallbladder polypoid lesion of 6–9 mm, or risk factors for malignancy and a gallbladder polypoid lesion 5 mm or less, follow-up ultrasound of the gallbladder is recommended at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. Follow-up should be discontinued after 2 years in the absence of growth. Moderate strength recommendation, moderate-quality evidence. 6. If the patient has no risk factors for malignancy, and a gallbladder polypoid lesion of 5 mm or less, follow-up is not required. Strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence. 7. If during follow-up the gallbladder polypoid lesion grows to 10 mm, then cholecystectomy is advised. If the polypoid lesion grows by 2 mm or more within the 2-year follow-up period, then the current size of the polypoid lesion should be considered along with patient risk factors. Multidisciplinary discussion may be employed to decide whether continuation of monitoring, or cholecystectomy, is necessary. Moderate strength recommendation, moderate-quality evidence. 8. If during follow-up the gallbladder polypoid lesion disappears, then monitoring can be discontinued. Strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence. SOURCE AND SCOPE: These guidelines are an update of the 2017 recommendations developed between the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR), European Association for Endoscopic Surgery and other Interventional Techniques (EAES), International Society of Digestive Surgery–European Federation (EFISDS) and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). A targeted literature search was performed to discover recent evidence concerning the management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps. The changes within these updated guidelines were formulated after consideration of the latest evidence by a group of international experts. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was adopted to define the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence. KEY POINT: • These recommendations update the 2017 European guidelines regarding the management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-12-17 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9038818/ /pubmed/34918177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08384-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Hepatobiliary-Pancreas Foley, Kieran G. Lahaye, Max J. Thoeni, Ruedi F. Soltes, Marek Dewhurst, Catherine Barbu, Sorin Traian Vashist, Yogesh K. Rafaelsen, Søren Rafael Arvanitakis, Marianna Perinel, Julie Wiles, Rebecca Roberts, Stuart Ashley Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: updated joint guidelines between the ESGAR, EAES, EFISDS and ESGE |
title | Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: updated joint guidelines between the ESGAR, EAES, EFISDS and ESGE |
title_full | Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: updated joint guidelines between the ESGAR, EAES, EFISDS and ESGE |
title_fullStr | Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: updated joint guidelines between the ESGAR, EAES, EFISDS and ESGE |
title_full_unstemmed | Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: updated joint guidelines between the ESGAR, EAES, EFISDS and ESGE |
title_short | Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: updated joint guidelines between the ESGAR, EAES, EFISDS and ESGE |
title_sort | management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: updated joint guidelines between the esgar, eaes, efisds and esge |
topic | Hepatobiliary-Pancreas |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9038818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34918177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08384-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT foleykierang managementandfollowupofgallbladderpolypsupdatedjointguidelinesbetweentheesgareaesefisdsandesge AT lahayemaxj managementandfollowupofgallbladderpolypsupdatedjointguidelinesbetweentheesgareaesefisdsandesge AT thoeniruedif managementandfollowupofgallbladderpolypsupdatedjointguidelinesbetweentheesgareaesefisdsandesge AT soltesmarek managementandfollowupofgallbladderpolypsupdatedjointguidelinesbetweentheesgareaesefisdsandesge AT dewhurstcatherine managementandfollowupofgallbladderpolypsupdatedjointguidelinesbetweentheesgareaesefisdsandesge AT barbusorintraian managementandfollowupofgallbladderpolypsupdatedjointguidelinesbetweentheesgareaesefisdsandesge AT vashistyogeshk managementandfollowupofgallbladderpolypsupdatedjointguidelinesbetweentheesgareaesefisdsandesge AT rafaelsensørenrafael managementandfollowupofgallbladderpolypsupdatedjointguidelinesbetweentheesgareaesefisdsandesge AT arvanitakismarianna managementandfollowupofgallbladderpolypsupdatedjointguidelinesbetweentheesgareaesefisdsandesge AT perineljulie managementandfollowupofgallbladderpolypsupdatedjointguidelinesbetweentheesgareaesefisdsandesge AT wilesrebecca managementandfollowupofgallbladderpolypsupdatedjointguidelinesbetweentheesgareaesefisdsandesge AT robertsstuartashley managementandfollowupofgallbladderpolypsupdatedjointguidelinesbetweentheesgareaesefisdsandesge |