Cargando…

Can we increase efficiency of CT lung cancer screening by combining with CVD and COPD screening? Results of an early economic evaluation

OBJECTIVES: Estimating the maximum acceptable cost (MAC) per screened individual for low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer (LC) screening, and determining the effect of additionally screening for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cardiovascular disease (CVD), or both on the MAC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Behr, Carina M., Koffijberg, Hendrik, Degeling, Koen, Vliegenthart, Rozemarijn, IJzerman, Maarten J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9038824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34973103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08422-7
_version_ 1784693988441194496
author Behr, Carina M.
Koffijberg, Hendrik
Degeling, Koen
Vliegenthart, Rozemarijn
IJzerman, Maarten J.
author_facet Behr, Carina M.
Koffijberg, Hendrik
Degeling, Koen
Vliegenthart, Rozemarijn
IJzerman, Maarten J.
author_sort Behr, Carina M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Estimating the maximum acceptable cost (MAC) per screened individual for low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer (LC) screening, and determining the effect of additionally screening for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cardiovascular disease (CVD), or both on the MAC. METHODS: A model-based early health technology assessment (HTA) was conducted to estimate whether a new intervention could be cost-effective by calculating the MAC at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) of €20k/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and €80k/QALY, for a population of current and former smokers, aged 50–75 years in The Netherlands. The MAC was estimated based on incremental QALYs gained from a stage shift assuming screened individuals are detected in earlier disease stages. Data were obtained from literature and publicly available statistics and validated with experts. RESULTS: The MAC per individual for implementing LC screening at a WTP of €20k/QALY was €113. If COPD, CVD, or both were included in screening, the MAC increased to €230, €895, or €971 respectively. Scenario analyses assessed whether screening-specific disease high-risk populations would improve cost-effectiveness, showing that high-risk CVD populations were more likely to improve economic viability compared to COPD. CONCLUSIONS: The economic viability of combined screening is substantially larger than for LC screening alone, primarily due to benefits from CVD screening, and is dependent on the target screening population, which is key to optimise the screening program. The total cost of breast and cervical cancer screening is lower (€420) than the MAC of Big-3, indicating that Big-3 screening may be acceptable from a health economic perspective. KEY POINTS: • Once-off combined low-dose CT screening for lung cancer, COPD, and CVD in individuals aged 50–75 years is potentially cost-effective if screening would cost less than €971 per screened individual. • Multi-disease screening requires detailed insight into the co-occurrence of these diseases to identify the optimal target screening population. • With the same target screening population and WTP, lung cancer-only screening should cost less than €113 per screened individual to be cost-effective. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-08422-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9038824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90388242022-05-07 Can we increase efficiency of CT lung cancer screening by combining with CVD and COPD screening? Results of an early economic evaluation Behr, Carina M. Koffijberg, Hendrik Degeling, Koen Vliegenthart, Rozemarijn IJzerman, Maarten J. Eur Radiol Health Economy OBJECTIVES: Estimating the maximum acceptable cost (MAC) per screened individual for low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer (LC) screening, and determining the effect of additionally screening for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cardiovascular disease (CVD), or both on the MAC. METHODS: A model-based early health technology assessment (HTA) was conducted to estimate whether a new intervention could be cost-effective by calculating the MAC at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) of €20k/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and €80k/QALY, for a population of current and former smokers, aged 50–75 years in The Netherlands. The MAC was estimated based on incremental QALYs gained from a stage shift assuming screened individuals are detected in earlier disease stages. Data were obtained from literature and publicly available statistics and validated with experts. RESULTS: The MAC per individual for implementing LC screening at a WTP of €20k/QALY was €113. If COPD, CVD, or both were included in screening, the MAC increased to €230, €895, or €971 respectively. Scenario analyses assessed whether screening-specific disease high-risk populations would improve cost-effectiveness, showing that high-risk CVD populations were more likely to improve economic viability compared to COPD. CONCLUSIONS: The economic viability of combined screening is substantially larger than for LC screening alone, primarily due to benefits from CVD screening, and is dependent on the target screening population, which is key to optimise the screening program. The total cost of breast and cervical cancer screening is lower (€420) than the MAC of Big-3, indicating that Big-3 screening may be acceptable from a health economic perspective. KEY POINTS: • Once-off combined low-dose CT screening for lung cancer, COPD, and CVD in individuals aged 50–75 years is potentially cost-effective if screening would cost less than €971 per screened individual. • Multi-disease screening requires detailed insight into the co-occurrence of these diseases to identify the optimal target screening population. • With the same target screening population and WTP, lung cancer-only screening should cost less than €113 per screened individual to be cost-effective. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-08422-7. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-01-01 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9038824/ /pubmed/34973103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08422-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Economy
Behr, Carina M.
Koffijberg, Hendrik
Degeling, Koen
Vliegenthart, Rozemarijn
IJzerman, Maarten J.
Can we increase efficiency of CT lung cancer screening by combining with CVD and COPD screening? Results of an early economic evaluation
title Can we increase efficiency of CT lung cancer screening by combining with CVD and COPD screening? Results of an early economic evaluation
title_full Can we increase efficiency of CT lung cancer screening by combining with CVD and COPD screening? Results of an early economic evaluation
title_fullStr Can we increase efficiency of CT lung cancer screening by combining with CVD and COPD screening? Results of an early economic evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Can we increase efficiency of CT lung cancer screening by combining with CVD and COPD screening? Results of an early economic evaluation
title_short Can we increase efficiency of CT lung cancer screening by combining with CVD and COPD screening? Results of an early economic evaluation
title_sort can we increase efficiency of ct lung cancer screening by combining with cvd and copd screening? results of an early economic evaluation
topic Health Economy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9038824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34973103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08422-7
work_keys_str_mv AT behrcarinam canweincreaseefficiencyofctlungcancerscreeningbycombiningwithcvdandcopdscreeningresultsofanearlyeconomicevaluation
AT koffijberghendrik canweincreaseefficiencyofctlungcancerscreeningbycombiningwithcvdandcopdscreeningresultsofanearlyeconomicevaluation
AT degelingkoen canweincreaseefficiencyofctlungcancerscreeningbycombiningwithcvdandcopdscreeningresultsofanearlyeconomicevaluation
AT vliegenthartrozemarijn canweincreaseefficiencyofctlungcancerscreeningbycombiningwithcvdandcopdscreeningresultsofanearlyeconomicevaluation
AT ijzermanmaartenj canweincreaseefficiencyofctlungcancerscreeningbycombiningwithcvdandcopdscreeningresultsofanearlyeconomicevaluation