Cargando…

Letter chunk frequency does not explain morphological masked priming: Affix frequency in masked priming

Research on visual word identification has extensively investigated the role of morphemes, recurrent letter chunks that convey a fairly regular meaning (e.g., lead-er-ship). Masked priming studies highlighted morpheme identification in complex (e.g., sing-er) and pseudo-complex (corn-er) words, as w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Rosa, Mara, Crepaldi, Davide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9038885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34741277
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-02010-y
_version_ 1784694002676662272
author De Rosa, Mara
Crepaldi, Davide
author_facet De Rosa, Mara
Crepaldi, Davide
author_sort De Rosa, Mara
collection PubMed
description Research on visual word identification has extensively investigated the role of morphemes, recurrent letter chunks that convey a fairly regular meaning (e.g., lead-er-ship). Masked priming studies highlighted morpheme identification in complex (e.g., sing-er) and pseudo-complex (corn-er) words, as well as in nonwords (e.g., basket-y). The present study investigated whether such sensitivity to morphemes could be rooted in the visual system sensitivity to statistics of letter (co)occurrence. To this aim, we assessed masked priming as induced by nonword primes obtained by combining a stem (e.g., bulb) with (i) naturally frequent, derivational suffixes (e.g., -ment), (ii) non-morphological, equally frequent word-endings (e.g., -idge), and (iii) non-morphological, infrequent word-endings (e.g., -kle). In two additional tasks, we collected interpretability and word-likeness measures for morphologically-structured nonwords, to assess whether priming is modulated by such factors. Results indicate that masked priming is not affected by either the frequency or the morphological status of word-endings, a pattern that was replicated in a second experiment including also lexical primes. Our findings are in line with models of early visual processing based on automatic stem/word extraction, and rule out letter chunk frequency as a main player in the early stages of visual word identification. Nonword interpretability and word-likeness do not affect this pattern.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9038885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90388852022-05-07 Letter chunk frequency does not explain morphological masked priming: Affix frequency in masked priming De Rosa, Mara Crepaldi, Davide Psychon Bull Rev Brief Report Research on visual word identification has extensively investigated the role of morphemes, recurrent letter chunks that convey a fairly regular meaning (e.g., lead-er-ship). Masked priming studies highlighted morpheme identification in complex (e.g., sing-er) and pseudo-complex (corn-er) words, as well as in nonwords (e.g., basket-y). The present study investigated whether such sensitivity to morphemes could be rooted in the visual system sensitivity to statistics of letter (co)occurrence. To this aim, we assessed masked priming as induced by nonword primes obtained by combining a stem (e.g., bulb) with (i) naturally frequent, derivational suffixes (e.g., -ment), (ii) non-morphological, equally frequent word-endings (e.g., -idge), and (iii) non-morphological, infrequent word-endings (e.g., -kle). In two additional tasks, we collected interpretability and word-likeness measures for morphologically-structured nonwords, to assess whether priming is modulated by such factors. Results indicate that masked priming is not affected by either the frequency or the morphological status of word-endings, a pattern that was replicated in a second experiment including also lexical primes. Our findings are in line with models of early visual processing based on automatic stem/word extraction, and rule out letter chunk frequency as a main player in the early stages of visual word identification. Nonword interpretability and word-likeness do not affect this pattern. Springer US 2021-11-05 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9038885/ /pubmed/34741277 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-02010-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Brief Report
De Rosa, Mara
Crepaldi, Davide
Letter chunk frequency does not explain morphological masked priming: Affix frequency in masked priming
title Letter chunk frequency does not explain morphological masked priming: Affix frequency in masked priming
title_full Letter chunk frequency does not explain morphological masked priming: Affix frequency in masked priming
title_fullStr Letter chunk frequency does not explain morphological masked priming: Affix frequency in masked priming
title_full_unstemmed Letter chunk frequency does not explain morphological masked priming: Affix frequency in masked priming
title_short Letter chunk frequency does not explain morphological masked priming: Affix frequency in masked priming
title_sort letter chunk frequency does not explain morphological masked priming: affix frequency in masked priming
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9038885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34741277
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-02010-y
work_keys_str_mv AT derosamara letterchunkfrequencydoesnotexplainmorphologicalmaskedprimingaffixfrequencyinmaskedpriming
AT crepaldidavide letterchunkfrequencydoesnotexplainmorphologicalmaskedprimingaffixfrequencyinmaskedpriming