Cargando…
COVID-19 amongst western democracies: A welfare state analysis
The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in more than 282 million cases and almost 5.5 million deaths (WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard, 2022). Its impact, however, has not been uniform. This analysis examines differences in COVID-19 cases and mortality rates amongst different welfare states w...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Palgrave Macmillan UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9039269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35492957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41285-022-00178-4 |
_version_ | 1784694088902115328 |
---|---|
author | Bejan, Raluca Nikolova, Kristina |
author_facet | Bejan, Raluca Nikolova, Kristina |
author_sort | Bejan, Raluca |
collection | PubMed |
description | The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in more than 282 million cases and almost 5.5 million deaths (WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard, 2022). Its impact, however, has not been uniform. This analysis examines differences in COVID-19 cases and mortality rates amongst different welfare states within the first three waves of the pandemic using repeated measures Multivariate Analysis of Covariance (MANCOVA). Liberal states fared much better on the number of COVID-19 cases, deaths, and excess deaths than the Conservative/Corporatist welfare democracies. Social Democratic countries, in turn, did not fare any better than their Conservative/Corporatist counterparts once potential confounding economic and political variables were accounted for: countries’ economic status, healthcare spending, availability of medical personnel, hospital beds, pandemic-related income support and debt relief, electoral events, and left-power mobilization. The pandemic-related welfare responses after the first wave were similar across all three types of western democracies, but the differences in pandemic outcomes remained. The somewhat better outlook of the Liberal states could be attributed to the so-called social democratization of the Anglo-American democracies, but also to the fact that neoliberalism could have flattened the previous differences between the welfare states typologies and could have brought states closer to each other, ideologically speaking, in terms of welfare provision. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9039269 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Palgrave Macmillan UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90392692022-04-26 COVID-19 amongst western democracies: A welfare state analysis Bejan, Raluca Nikolova, Kristina Soc Theory Health Original Article The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in more than 282 million cases and almost 5.5 million deaths (WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard, 2022). Its impact, however, has not been uniform. This analysis examines differences in COVID-19 cases and mortality rates amongst different welfare states within the first three waves of the pandemic using repeated measures Multivariate Analysis of Covariance (MANCOVA). Liberal states fared much better on the number of COVID-19 cases, deaths, and excess deaths than the Conservative/Corporatist welfare democracies. Social Democratic countries, in turn, did not fare any better than their Conservative/Corporatist counterparts once potential confounding economic and political variables were accounted for: countries’ economic status, healthcare spending, availability of medical personnel, hospital beds, pandemic-related income support and debt relief, electoral events, and left-power mobilization. The pandemic-related welfare responses after the first wave were similar across all three types of western democracies, but the differences in pandemic outcomes remained. The somewhat better outlook of the Liberal states could be attributed to the so-called social democratization of the Anglo-American democracies, but also to the fact that neoliberalism could have flattened the previous differences between the welfare states typologies and could have brought states closer to each other, ideologically speaking, in terms of welfare provision. Palgrave Macmillan UK 2022-04-26 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9039269/ /pubmed/35492957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41285-022-00178-4 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bejan, Raluca Nikolova, Kristina COVID-19 amongst western democracies: A welfare state analysis |
title | COVID-19 amongst western democracies: A welfare state analysis |
title_full | COVID-19 amongst western democracies: A welfare state analysis |
title_fullStr | COVID-19 amongst western democracies: A welfare state analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | COVID-19 amongst western democracies: A welfare state analysis |
title_short | COVID-19 amongst western democracies: A welfare state analysis |
title_sort | covid-19 amongst western democracies: a welfare state analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9039269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35492957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41285-022-00178-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bejanraluca covid19amongstwesterndemocraciesawelfarestateanalysis AT nikolovakristina covid19amongstwesterndemocraciesawelfarestateanalysis |