Cargando…

Introgressing cry1Ac for Pod Borer Resistance in Chickpea Through Marker-Assisted Backcross Breeding

The gram pod borer Helicoverpa armigera is a major constraint to chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) production worldwide, reducing crop yield by up to 90%. The constraint is difficult to overcome as chickpea germplasm including wild species either lacks pod borer resistance or if possessing resistance is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaur, Ajinder, Sharma, Urvashi, Singh, Sarvjeet, Singh, Ravinder, Vikal, Yogesh, Singh, Satnam, Malik, Palvi, Kaur, Khushpreet, Singh, Inderjit, Bindra, Shayla, Sarmah, Bidyut Kumar, Sandhu, Jagdeep Singh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9039336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35495135
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.847647
_version_ 1784694105765314560
author Kaur, Ajinder
Sharma, Urvashi
Singh, Sarvjeet
Singh, Ravinder
Vikal, Yogesh
Singh, Satnam
Malik, Palvi
Kaur, Khushpreet
Singh, Inderjit
Bindra, Shayla
Sarmah, Bidyut Kumar
Sandhu, Jagdeep Singh
author_facet Kaur, Ajinder
Sharma, Urvashi
Singh, Sarvjeet
Singh, Ravinder
Vikal, Yogesh
Singh, Satnam
Malik, Palvi
Kaur, Khushpreet
Singh, Inderjit
Bindra, Shayla
Sarmah, Bidyut Kumar
Sandhu, Jagdeep Singh
author_sort Kaur, Ajinder
collection PubMed
description The gram pod borer Helicoverpa armigera is a major constraint to chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) production worldwide, reducing crop yield by up to 90%. The constraint is difficult to overcome as chickpea germplasm including wild species either lacks pod borer resistance or if possessing resistance is cross-incompatible. This study describes conversion of elite but pod borer-susceptible commercial chickpea cultivars into resistant cultivars through introgression of cry1Ac using marker-assisted backcross breeding. The chickpea cultivars (PBG7 and L552) were crossed with pod borer-resistant transgenic lines (BS 100B and BS 100E) carrying cry1Ac that led to the development of BC(1)F(1), BC(1)F(2), BC(1)F(3), BC(2)F(1), BC(2)F(2), and BC(2)F(3) populations from three cross combinations. The foreground selection revealed that 35.38% BC(1)F(1) and 8.4% BC(1)F(2) plants obtained from Cross A (PBG7 × BS 100B), 50% BC(1)F(1) and 76.5% BC(1)F(2) plants from Cross B (L552 × BS 100E), and 12.05% BC(2)F(2) and 82.81% (average) BC(2)F(3) plants derived from Cross C (PBG7 × BS 100E) carried the cry1Ac gene. The bioassay of backcross populations for toxicity to H. armigera displayed up to 100% larval mortality. BC(1)F(1) and BC(1)F(2) populations derived from Cross B and BC(2)F(3) population from Cross C segregated in the Mendelian ratio for cry1Ac confirmed inheritance of a single copy of transgene, whereas BC(1)F(1) and BC(1)F(2) populations obtained from Cross A and BC(2)F(2) population from Cross C exhibited distorted segregation ratios. BC(1)F(1) plants of Cross A and Cross B accumulated Cry1Ac protein ranging from 11.03 to 11.71 µgg(−1) in leaf tissue. Cry1Ac-positive BC(2)F(2) plants from Cross C demonstrated high recurrent parent genome recovery (91.3%) through background selection using SSR markers and phenome recovery of 90.94%, amongst these 30% plants, were homozygous for transgene. The performance of BC(2)F(3) progenies derived from homozygous plants was similar to that of the recurrent parent for main agronomic traits, such as number of pods and seed yield per plant. These progenies are a valuable source for H. armigera resistance in chickpea breeding programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9039336
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90393362022-04-27 Introgressing cry1Ac for Pod Borer Resistance in Chickpea Through Marker-Assisted Backcross Breeding Kaur, Ajinder Sharma, Urvashi Singh, Sarvjeet Singh, Ravinder Vikal, Yogesh Singh, Satnam Malik, Palvi Kaur, Khushpreet Singh, Inderjit Bindra, Shayla Sarmah, Bidyut Kumar Sandhu, Jagdeep Singh Front Genet Genetics The gram pod borer Helicoverpa armigera is a major constraint to chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) production worldwide, reducing crop yield by up to 90%. The constraint is difficult to overcome as chickpea germplasm including wild species either lacks pod borer resistance or if possessing resistance is cross-incompatible. This study describes conversion of elite but pod borer-susceptible commercial chickpea cultivars into resistant cultivars through introgression of cry1Ac using marker-assisted backcross breeding. The chickpea cultivars (PBG7 and L552) were crossed with pod borer-resistant transgenic lines (BS 100B and BS 100E) carrying cry1Ac that led to the development of BC(1)F(1), BC(1)F(2), BC(1)F(3), BC(2)F(1), BC(2)F(2), and BC(2)F(3) populations from three cross combinations. The foreground selection revealed that 35.38% BC(1)F(1) and 8.4% BC(1)F(2) plants obtained from Cross A (PBG7 × BS 100B), 50% BC(1)F(1) and 76.5% BC(1)F(2) plants from Cross B (L552 × BS 100E), and 12.05% BC(2)F(2) and 82.81% (average) BC(2)F(3) plants derived from Cross C (PBG7 × BS 100E) carried the cry1Ac gene. The bioassay of backcross populations for toxicity to H. armigera displayed up to 100% larval mortality. BC(1)F(1) and BC(1)F(2) populations derived from Cross B and BC(2)F(3) population from Cross C segregated in the Mendelian ratio for cry1Ac confirmed inheritance of a single copy of transgene, whereas BC(1)F(1) and BC(1)F(2) populations obtained from Cross A and BC(2)F(2) population from Cross C exhibited distorted segregation ratios. BC(1)F(1) plants of Cross A and Cross B accumulated Cry1Ac protein ranging from 11.03 to 11.71 µgg(−1) in leaf tissue. Cry1Ac-positive BC(2)F(2) plants from Cross C demonstrated high recurrent parent genome recovery (91.3%) through background selection using SSR markers and phenome recovery of 90.94%, amongst these 30% plants, were homozygous for transgene. The performance of BC(2)F(3) progenies derived from homozygous plants was similar to that of the recurrent parent for main agronomic traits, such as number of pods and seed yield per plant. These progenies are a valuable source for H. armigera resistance in chickpea breeding programs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9039336/ /pubmed/35495135 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.847647 Text en Copyright © 2022 Kaur, Sharma, Singh, Singh, Vikal, Singh, Malik, Kaur, Singh, Bindra, Sarmah and Sandhu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
Kaur, Ajinder
Sharma, Urvashi
Singh, Sarvjeet
Singh, Ravinder
Vikal, Yogesh
Singh, Satnam
Malik, Palvi
Kaur, Khushpreet
Singh, Inderjit
Bindra, Shayla
Sarmah, Bidyut Kumar
Sandhu, Jagdeep Singh
Introgressing cry1Ac for Pod Borer Resistance in Chickpea Through Marker-Assisted Backcross Breeding
title Introgressing cry1Ac for Pod Borer Resistance in Chickpea Through Marker-Assisted Backcross Breeding
title_full Introgressing cry1Ac for Pod Borer Resistance in Chickpea Through Marker-Assisted Backcross Breeding
title_fullStr Introgressing cry1Ac for Pod Borer Resistance in Chickpea Through Marker-Assisted Backcross Breeding
title_full_unstemmed Introgressing cry1Ac for Pod Borer Resistance in Chickpea Through Marker-Assisted Backcross Breeding
title_short Introgressing cry1Ac for Pod Borer Resistance in Chickpea Through Marker-Assisted Backcross Breeding
title_sort introgressing cry1ac for pod borer resistance in chickpea through marker-assisted backcross breeding
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9039336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35495135
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.847647
work_keys_str_mv AT kaurajinder introgressingcry1acforpodborerresistanceinchickpeathroughmarkerassistedbackcrossbreeding
AT sharmaurvashi introgressingcry1acforpodborerresistanceinchickpeathroughmarkerassistedbackcrossbreeding
AT singhsarvjeet introgressingcry1acforpodborerresistanceinchickpeathroughmarkerassistedbackcrossbreeding
AT singhravinder introgressingcry1acforpodborerresistanceinchickpeathroughmarkerassistedbackcrossbreeding
AT vikalyogesh introgressingcry1acforpodborerresistanceinchickpeathroughmarkerassistedbackcrossbreeding
AT singhsatnam introgressingcry1acforpodborerresistanceinchickpeathroughmarkerassistedbackcrossbreeding
AT malikpalvi introgressingcry1acforpodborerresistanceinchickpeathroughmarkerassistedbackcrossbreeding
AT kaurkhushpreet introgressingcry1acforpodborerresistanceinchickpeathroughmarkerassistedbackcrossbreeding
AT singhinderjit introgressingcry1acforpodborerresistanceinchickpeathroughmarkerassistedbackcrossbreeding
AT bindrashayla introgressingcry1acforpodborerresistanceinchickpeathroughmarkerassistedbackcrossbreeding
AT sarmahbidyutkumar introgressingcry1acforpodborerresistanceinchickpeathroughmarkerassistedbackcrossbreeding
AT sandhujagdeepsingh introgressingcry1acforpodborerresistanceinchickpeathroughmarkerassistedbackcrossbreeding