Cargando…

Effect of Prognostic Guided Management of Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism According to the European Society of Cardiology Risk Stratification Model

BACKGROUND: A recent trial showed that management driven by prognostic assessment was effective in reducing the length of stay (LOS) for acute stable pulmonary embolism (PE). The efficacy and safety of this strategy in each subgroup of risk stratification remains unknown. METHODS: We conducted a pos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiménez, David, Rodríguez, Carmen, Pintado, Beatriz, Pérez, Andrea, Jara-Palomares, Luis, López-Reyes, Raquel, Ruiz-Artacho, Pedro, García-Ortega, Alberto, Bikdeli, Behnood, Lobo, José Luis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9039515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35497990
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.872115
_version_ 1784694145307115520
author Jiménez, David
Rodríguez, Carmen
Pintado, Beatriz
Pérez, Andrea
Jara-Palomares, Luis
López-Reyes, Raquel
Ruiz-Artacho, Pedro
García-Ortega, Alberto
Bikdeli, Behnood
Lobo, José Luis
author_facet Jiménez, David
Rodríguez, Carmen
Pintado, Beatriz
Pérez, Andrea
Jara-Palomares, Luis
López-Reyes, Raquel
Ruiz-Artacho, Pedro
García-Ortega, Alberto
Bikdeli, Behnood
Lobo, José Luis
author_sort Jiménez, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A recent trial showed that management driven by prognostic assessment was effective in reducing the length of stay (LOS) for acute stable pulmonary embolism (PE). The efficacy and safety of this strategy in each subgroup of risk stratification remains unknown. METHODS: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the randomized IPEP study to evaluate the effect of a management strategy guided by early use of a prognostic pathway in the low- and intermediate-high risk subgroups defined by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) model. These subgroups were retrospectively identified in the control arm. The primary outcome was LOS. The secondary outcomes were 30-day clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of 249 patients assigned to the intervention group, 60 (24%) were classified as low-, and 30 (12%) as intermediate-high risk. Among 249 patients assigned to the control group, 66 (27%) were low-, and 13 (5%) intermediate-high risk. In the low-risk group, the mean LOS was 2.1 (±0.9) days in the intervention group and 5.3 (±2.9) days in the control group (P < 0.001). In this group, no significant differences were observed in 30-day readmissions (0% vs. 3.0%, respectively), all-cause (0% vs. 0%) and PE-related mortality rates (0% vs. 0%), or severe adverse events (0% vs. 1.5%). In the intermediate-high risk group, the mean LOS was 5.3 (±1.8) days in the intervention group and 6.5 (±2.5) days in the control group (P = 0.08). In this group, no significant differences were observed in 30-day readmissions (3.3% vs. 3.0%, respectively), all-cause (6.7% vs. 7.7%) and PE-related mortality rates (6.7% vs. 7.7%), or severe adverse events (16.7% vs. 15.4%). CONCLUSION: The use of a prognostic assessment and management pathway was effective in reducing the LOS for acute PE without comprising safety across subgroups of risk stratification. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: [ClinicalTrials.gov], Identifier [NCT02733198].
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9039515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90395152022-04-27 Effect of Prognostic Guided Management of Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism According to the European Society of Cardiology Risk Stratification Model Jiménez, David Rodríguez, Carmen Pintado, Beatriz Pérez, Andrea Jara-Palomares, Luis López-Reyes, Raquel Ruiz-Artacho, Pedro García-Ortega, Alberto Bikdeli, Behnood Lobo, José Luis Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: A recent trial showed that management driven by prognostic assessment was effective in reducing the length of stay (LOS) for acute stable pulmonary embolism (PE). The efficacy and safety of this strategy in each subgroup of risk stratification remains unknown. METHODS: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the randomized IPEP study to evaluate the effect of a management strategy guided by early use of a prognostic pathway in the low- and intermediate-high risk subgroups defined by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) model. These subgroups were retrospectively identified in the control arm. The primary outcome was LOS. The secondary outcomes were 30-day clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of 249 patients assigned to the intervention group, 60 (24%) were classified as low-, and 30 (12%) as intermediate-high risk. Among 249 patients assigned to the control group, 66 (27%) were low-, and 13 (5%) intermediate-high risk. In the low-risk group, the mean LOS was 2.1 (±0.9) days in the intervention group and 5.3 (±2.9) days in the control group (P < 0.001). In this group, no significant differences were observed in 30-day readmissions (0% vs. 3.0%, respectively), all-cause (0% vs. 0%) and PE-related mortality rates (0% vs. 0%), or severe adverse events (0% vs. 1.5%). In the intermediate-high risk group, the mean LOS was 5.3 (±1.8) days in the intervention group and 6.5 (±2.5) days in the control group (P = 0.08). In this group, no significant differences were observed in 30-day readmissions (3.3% vs. 3.0%, respectively), all-cause (6.7% vs. 7.7%) and PE-related mortality rates (6.7% vs. 7.7%), or severe adverse events (16.7% vs. 15.4%). CONCLUSION: The use of a prognostic assessment and management pathway was effective in reducing the LOS for acute PE without comprising safety across subgroups of risk stratification. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: [ClinicalTrials.gov], Identifier [NCT02733198]. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9039515/ /pubmed/35497990 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.872115 Text en Copyright © 2022 Jiménez, Rodríguez, Pintado, Pérez, Jara-Palomares, López-Reyes, Ruiz-Artacho, García-Ortega, Bikdeli, Lobo and the IPEP investigators. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Jiménez, David
Rodríguez, Carmen
Pintado, Beatriz
Pérez, Andrea
Jara-Palomares, Luis
López-Reyes, Raquel
Ruiz-Artacho, Pedro
García-Ortega, Alberto
Bikdeli, Behnood
Lobo, José Luis
Effect of Prognostic Guided Management of Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism According to the European Society of Cardiology Risk Stratification Model
title Effect of Prognostic Guided Management of Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism According to the European Society of Cardiology Risk Stratification Model
title_full Effect of Prognostic Guided Management of Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism According to the European Society of Cardiology Risk Stratification Model
title_fullStr Effect of Prognostic Guided Management of Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism According to the European Society of Cardiology Risk Stratification Model
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Prognostic Guided Management of Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism According to the European Society of Cardiology Risk Stratification Model
title_short Effect of Prognostic Guided Management of Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism According to the European Society of Cardiology Risk Stratification Model
title_sort effect of prognostic guided management of patients with acute pulmonary embolism according to the european society of cardiology risk stratification model
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9039515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35497990
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.872115
work_keys_str_mv AT jimenezdavid effectofprognosticguidedmanagementofpatientswithacutepulmonaryembolismaccordingtotheeuropeansocietyofcardiologyriskstratificationmodel
AT rodriguezcarmen effectofprognosticguidedmanagementofpatientswithacutepulmonaryembolismaccordingtotheeuropeansocietyofcardiologyriskstratificationmodel
AT pintadobeatriz effectofprognosticguidedmanagementofpatientswithacutepulmonaryembolismaccordingtotheeuropeansocietyofcardiologyriskstratificationmodel
AT perezandrea effectofprognosticguidedmanagementofpatientswithacutepulmonaryembolismaccordingtotheeuropeansocietyofcardiologyriskstratificationmodel
AT jarapalomaresluis effectofprognosticguidedmanagementofpatientswithacutepulmonaryembolismaccordingtotheeuropeansocietyofcardiologyriskstratificationmodel
AT lopezreyesraquel effectofprognosticguidedmanagementofpatientswithacutepulmonaryembolismaccordingtotheeuropeansocietyofcardiologyriskstratificationmodel
AT ruizartachopedro effectofprognosticguidedmanagementofpatientswithacutepulmonaryembolismaccordingtotheeuropeansocietyofcardiologyriskstratificationmodel
AT garciaortegaalberto effectofprognosticguidedmanagementofpatientswithacutepulmonaryembolismaccordingtotheeuropeansocietyofcardiologyriskstratificationmodel
AT bikdelibehnood effectofprognosticguidedmanagementofpatientswithacutepulmonaryembolismaccordingtotheeuropeansocietyofcardiologyriskstratificationmodel
AT lobojoseluis effectofprognosticguidedmanagementofpatientswithacutepulmonaryembolismaccordingtotheeuropeansocietyofcardiologyriskstratificationmodel
AT effectofprognosticguidedmanagementofpatientswithacutepulmonaryembolismaccordingtotheeuropeansocietyofcardiologyriskstratificationmodel