Cargando…
Effect of Prognostic Guided Management of Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism According to the European Society of Cardiology Risk Stratification Model
BACKGROUND: A recent trial showed that management driven by prognostic assessment was effective in reducing the length of stay (LOS) for acute stable pulmonary embolism (PE). The efficacy and safety of this strategy in each subgroup of risk stratification remains unknown. METHODS: We conducted a pos...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9039515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35497990 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.872115 |
_version_ | 1784694145307115520 |
---|---|
author | Jiménez, David Rodríguez, Carmen Pintado, Beatriz Pérez, Andrea Jara-Palomares, Luis López-Reyes, Raquel Ruiz-Artacho, Pedro García-Ortega, Alberto Bikdeli, Behnood Lobo, José Luis |
author_facet | Jiménez, David Rodríguez, Carmen Pintado, Beatriz Pérez, Andrea Jara-Palomares, Luis López-Reyes, Raquel Ruiz-Artacho, Pedro García-Ortega, Alberto Bikdeli, Behnood Lobo, José Luis |
author_sort | Jiménez, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A recent trial showed that management driven by prognostic assessment was effective in reducing the length of stay (LOS) for acute stable pulmonary embolism (PE). The efficacy and safety of this strategy in each subgroup of risk stratification remains unknown. METHODS: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the randomized IPEP study to evaluate the effect of a management strategy guided by early use of a prognostic pathway in the low- and intermediate-high risk subgroups defined by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) model. These subgroups were retrospectively identified in the control arm. The primary outcome was LOS. The secondary outcomes were 30-day clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of 249 patients assigned to the intervention group, 60 (24%) were classified as low-, and 30 (12%) as intermediate-high risk. Among 249 patients assigned to the control group, 66 (27%) were low-, and 13 (5%) intermediate-high risk. In the low-risk group, the mean LOS was 2.1 (±0.9) days in the intervention group and 5.3 (±2.9) days in the control group (P < 0.001). In this group, no significant differences were observed in 30-day readmissions (0% vs. 3.0%, respectively), all-cause (0% vs. 0%) and PE-related mortality rates (0% vs. 0%), or severe adverse events (0% vs. 1.5%). In the intermediate-high risk group, the mean LOS was 5.3 (±1.8) days in the intervention group and 6.5 (±2.5) days in the control group (P = 0.08). In this group, no significant differences were observed in 30-day readmissions (3.3% vs. 3.0%, respectively), all-cause (6.7% vs. 7.7%) and PE-related mortality rates (6.7% vs. 7.7%), or severe adverse events (16.7% vs. 15.4%). CONCLUSION: The use of a prognostic assessment and management pathway was effective in reducing the LOS for acute PE without comprising safety across subgroups of risk stratification. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: [ClinicalTrials.gov], Identifier [NCT02733198]. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9039515 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90395152022-04-27 Effect of Prognostic Guided Management of Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism According to the European Society of Cardiology Risk Stratification Model Jiménez, David Rodríguez, Carmen Pintado, Beatriz Pérez, Andrea Jara-Palomares, Luis López-Reyes, Raquel Ruiz-Artacho, Pedro García-Ortega, Alberto Bikdeli, Behnood Lobo, José Luis Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: A recent trial showed that management driven by prognostic assessment was effective in reducing the length of stay (LOS) for acute stable pulmonary embolism (PE). The efficacy and safety of this strategy in each subgroup of risk stratification remains unknown. METHODS: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the randomized IPEP study to evaluate the effect of a management strategy guided by early use of a prognostic pathway in the low- and intermediate-high risk subgroups defined by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) model. These subgroups were retrospectively identified in the control arm. The primary outcome was LOS. The secondary outcomes were 30-day clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of 249 patients assigned to the intervention group, 60 (24%) were classified as low-, and 30 (12%) as intermediate-high risk. Among 249 patients assigned to the control group, 66 (27%) were low-, and 13 (5%) intermediate-high risk. In the low-risk group, the mean LOS was 2.1 (±0.9) days in the intervention group and 5.3 (±2.9) days in the control group (P < 0.001). In this group, no significant differences were observed in 30-day readmissions (0% vs. 3.0%, respectively), all-cause (0% vs. 0%) and PE-related mortality rates (0% vs. 0%), or severe adverse events (0% vs. 1.5%). In the intermediate-high risk group, the mean LOS was 5.3 (±1.8) days in the intervention group and 6.5 (±2.5) days in the control group (P = 0.08). In this group, no significant differences were observed in 30-day readmissions (3.3% vs. 3.0%, respectively), all-cause (6.7% vs. 7.7%) and PE-related mortality rates (6.7% vs. 7.7%), or severe adverse events (16.7% vs. 15.4%). CONCLUSION: The use of a prognostic assessment and management pathway was effective in reducing the LOS for acute PE without comprising safety across subgroups of risk stratification. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: [ClinicalTrials.gov], Identifier [NCT02733198]. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9039515/ /pubmed/35497990 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.872115 Text en Copyright © 2022 Jiménez, Rodríguez, Pintado, Pérez, Jara-Palomares, López-Reyes, Ruiz-Artacho, García-Ortega, Bikdeli, Lobo and the IPEP investigators. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Jiménez, David Rodríguez, Carmen Pintado, Beatriz Pérez, Andrea Jara-Palomares, Luis López-Reyes, Raquel Ruiz-Artacho, Pedro García-Ortega, Alberto Bikdeli, Behnood Lobo, José Luis Effect of Prognostic Guided Management of Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism According to the European Society of Cardiology Risk Stratification Model |
title | Effect of Prognostic Guided Management of Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism According to the European Society of Cardiology Risk Stratification Model |
title_full | Effect of Prognostic Guided Management of Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism According to the European Society of Cardiology Risk Stratification Model |
title_fullStr | Effect of Prognostic Guided Management of Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism According to the European Society of Cardiology Risk Stratification Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of Prognostic Guided Management of Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism According to the European Society of Cardiology Risk Stratification Model |
title_short | Effect of Prognostic Guided Management of Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism According to the European Society of Cardiology Risk Stratification Model |
title_sort | effect of prognostic guided management of patients with acute pulmonary embolism according to the european society of cardiology risk stratification model |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9039515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35497990 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.872115 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jimenezdavid effectofprognosticguidedmanagementofpatientswithacutepulmonaryembolismaccordingtotheeuropeansocietyofcardiologyriskstratificationmodel AT rodriguezcarmen effectofprognosticguidedmanagementofpatientswithacutepulmonaryembolismaccordingtotheeuropeansocietyofcardiologyriskstratificationmodel AT pintadobeatriz effectofprognosticguidedmanagementofpatientswithacutepulmonaryembolismaccordingtotheeuropeansocietyofcardiologyriskstratificationmodel AT perezandrea effectofprognosticguidedmanagementofpatientswithacutepulmonaryembolismaccordingtotheeuropeansocietyofcardiologyriskstratificationmodel AT jarapalomaresluis effectofprognosticguidedmanagementofpatientswithacutepulmonaryembolismaccordingtotheeuropeansocietyofcardiologyriskstratificationmodel AT lopezreyesraquel effectofprognosticguidedmanagementofpatientswithacutepulmonaryembolismaccordingtotheeuropeansocietyofcardiologyriskstratificationmodel AT ruizartachopedro effectofprognosticguidedmanagementofpatientswithacutepulmonaryembolismaccordingtotheeuropeansocietyofcardiologyriskstratificationmodel AT garciaortegaalberto effectofprognosticguidedmanagementofpatientswithacutepulmonaryembolismaccordingtotheeuropeansocietyofcardiologyriskstratificationmodel AT bikdelibehnood effectofprognosticguidedmanagementofpatientswithacutepulmonaryembolismaccordingtotheeuropeansocietyofcardiologyriskstratificationmodel AT lobojoseluis effectofprognosticguidedmanagementofpatientswithacutepulmonaryembolismaccordingtotheeuropeansocietyofcardiologyriskstratificationmodel AT effectofprognosticguidedmanagementofpatientswithacutepulmonaryembolismaccordingtotheeuropeansocietyofcardiologyriskstratificationmodel |