Cargando…

First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis/fusion: a systematic review of modern fixation techniques

BACKGROUND: First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis is commonly performed for symptomatic end-stage hallux rigidus. It has been postulated to produce good results in the literature. Various fixation techniques offer differences in union rates, complications and functional outcomes, stirring deba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Yang S., Bridgen, Andy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9040205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35468802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-022-00540-9
_version_ 1784694286364704768
author Kang, Yang S.
Bridgen, Andy
author_facet Kang, Yang S.
Bridgen, Andy
author_sort Kang, Yang S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis is commonly performed for symptomatic end-stage hallux rigidus. It has been postulated to produce good results in the literature. Various fixation techniques offer differences in union rates, complications and functional outcomes, stirring debates about which produces the best outcomes for patients. Therefore, this review aims to synthesise and compare the outcomes of modern fixation techniques used for first metatarsophalangeal joint (FMPJ) arthrodesis. METHODS: The electronic database searched were PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. The critical appraisal skills programme tool for cohort study was used. The interventions consisted of screw(s), plate(s), and staple(s). Studies comprising outdated fixation techniques such as suture, metallic wire, external fixation, Rush rods or Steinmann pins were excluded. Participants were adults over 18 years, undergoing FMPJ arthrodesis in the UK. Studies with the population consisting primarily of revision cases, patients with rheumatoid arthritis or diabetes were excluded. RESULTS: Seven UK studies included 277 feet and a 95.7% overall union rate at a mean union time of 83.5 days. Staples had the highest union rate of 98.2% at mean union time of 84 days, followed by plates (95.2%, 92 days), and finally screws (94.9%, 71 days). The overall complication incidence is 5.8%. All of the fixation techniques produced good functional outcomes postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst staple techniques showed the highest union rate, plating techniques are preferable over screws or staples for better results across several outcome measures, including reduced complication incidence, stability, early ambulation, and good functional outcome. The Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire and EuroQol-5Dimensional are recommended as measurement tools to assess functional outcomes following FMPJ arthrodesis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13047-022-00540-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9040205
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90402052022-04-27 First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis/fusion: a systematic review of modern fixation techniques Kang, Yang S. Bridgen, Andy J Foot Ankle Res Review BACKGROUND: First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis is commonly performed for symptomatic end-stage hallux rigidus. It has been postulated to produce good results in the literature. Various fixation techniques offer differences in union rates, complications and functional outcomes, stirring debates about which produces the best outcomes for patients. Therefore, this review aims to synthesise and compare the outcomes of modern fixation techniques used for first metatarsophalangeal joint (FMPJ) arthrodesis. METHODS: The electronic database searched were PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. The critical appraisal skills programme tool for cohort study was used. The interventions consisted of screw(s), plate(s), and staple(s). Studies comprising outdated fixation techniques such as suture, metallic wire, external fixation, Rush rods or Steinmann pins were excluded. Participants were adults over 18 years, undergoing FMPJ arthrodesis in the UK. Studies with the population consisting primarily of revision cases, patients with rheumatoid arthritis or diabetes were excluded. RESULTS: Seven UK studies included 277 feet and a 95.7% overall union rate at a mean union time of 83.5 days. Staples had the highest union rate of 98.2% at mean union time of 84 days, followed by plates (95.2%, 92 days), and finally screws (94.9%, 71 days). The overall complication incidence is 5.8%. All of the fixation techniques produced good functional outcomes postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst staple techniques showed the highest union rate, plating techniques are preferable over screws or staples for better results across several outcome measures, including reduced complication incidence, stability, early ambulation, and good functional outcome. The Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire and EuroQol-5Dimensional are recommended as measurement tools to assess functional outcomes following FMPJ arthrodesis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13047-022-00540-9. BioMed Central 2022-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9040205/ /pubmed/35468802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-022-00540-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Kang, Yang S.
Bridgen, Andy
First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis/fusion: a systematic review of modern fixation techniques
title First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis/fusion: a systematic review of modern fixation techniques
title_full First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis/fusion: a systematic review of modern fixation techniques
title_fullStr First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis/fusion: a systematic review of modern fixation techniques
title_full_unstemmed First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis/fusion: a systematic review of modern fixation techniques
title_short First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis/fusion: a systematic review of modern fixation techniques
title_sort first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis/fusion: a systematic review of modern fixation techniques
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9040205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35468802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-022-00540-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kangyangs firstmetatarsophalangealjointarthrodesisfusionasystematicreviewofmodernfixationtechniques
AT bridgenandy firstmetatarsophalangealjointarthrodesisfusionasystematicreviewofmodernfixationtechniques