Re-evaluating model assumptions suggests that Australian birds are more tolerant of heat and aridity than predicted: a response to Conradie et al. (2020)

Conradie et al. (2020) recently modelled the vulnerability of Australian arid birds to a changing climate. While the approach used by Conradie et al. (2020) is valuable, we argue that key assumptions in their study are poorly supported and the risks of a changing climate to arid zone avifauna are co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pacheco-Fuentes, Hector, Cooper, Christine E, Withers, Philip C, Griffith, Simon C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Comment
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9040279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35492422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coac010
_version_ 1784694303182815232
author Pacheco-Fuentes, Hector
Cooper, Christine E
Withers, Philip C
Griffith, Simon C
author_facet Pacheco-Fuentes, Hector
Cooper, Christine E
Withers, Philip C
Griffith, Simon C
author_sort Pacheco-Fuentes, Hector
collection PubMed
description Conradie et al. (2020) recently modelled the vulnerability of Australian arid birds to a changing climate. While the approach used by Conradie et al. (2020) is valuable, we argue that key assumptions in their study are poorly supported and the risks of a changing climate to arid zone avifauna are consequently overstated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9040279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90402792022-04-27 Re-evaluating model assumptions suggests that Australian birds are more tolerant of heat and aridity than predicted: a response to Conradie et al. (2020) Pacheco-Fuentes, Hector Cooper, Christine E Withers, Philip C Griffith, Simon C Conserv Physiol Comment Conradie et al. (2020) recently modelled the vulnerability of Australian arid birds to a changing climate. While the approach used by Conradie et al. (2020) is valuable, we argue that key assumptions in their study are poorly supported and the risks of a changing climate to arid zone avifauna are consequently overstated. Oxford University Press 2022-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9040279/ /pubmed/35492422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coac010 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press and the Society for Experimental Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Comment
Pacheco-Fuentes, Hector
Cooper, Christine E
Withers, Philip C
Griffith, Simon C
Re-evaluating model assumptions suggests that Australian birds are more tolerant of heat and aridity than predicted: a response to Conradie et al. (2020)
title Re-evaluating model assumptions suggests that Australian birds are more tolerant of heat and aridity than predicted: a response to Conradie et al. (2020)
title_full Re-evaluating model assumptions suggests that Australian birds are more tolerant of heat and aridity than predicted: a response to Conradie et al. (2020)
title_fullStr Re-evaluating model assumptions suggests that Australian birds are more tolerant of heat and aridity than predicted: a response to Conradie et al. (2020)
title_full_unstemmed Re-evaluating model assumptions suggests that Australian birds are more tolerant of heat and aridity than predicted: a response to Conradie et al. (2020)
title_short Re-evaluating model assumptions suggests that Australian birds are more tolerant of heat and aridity than predicted: a response to Conradie et al. (2020)
title_sort re-evaluating model assumptions suggests that australian birds are more tolerant of heat and aridity than predicted: a response to conradie et al. (2020)
topic Comment
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9040279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35492422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coac010
work_keys_str_mv AT pachecofuenteshector reevaluatingmodelassumptionssuggeststhataustralianbirdsaremoretolerantofheatandariditythanpredictedaresponsetoconradieetal2020
AT cooperchristinee reevaluatingmodelassumptionssuggeststhataustralianbirdsaremoretolerantofheatandariditythanpredictedaresponsetoconradieetal2020
AT withersphilipc reevaluatingmodelassumptionssuggeststhataustralianbirdsaremoretolerantofheatandariditythanpredictedaresponsetoconradieetal2020
AT griffithsimonc reevaluatingmodelassumptionssuggeststhataustralianbirdsaremoretolerantofheatandariditythanpredictedaresponsetoconradieetal2020

Ejemplares similares