Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fracture Liaison Services Compared with Standard of Care in the Secondary Prevention of Fragility Fractures in Spain

PURPOSE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of a Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) compared with standard care for the secondary prevention of fragility fractures in Spain. METHODS: Patients with osteoporosis and an initial fragility fracture who were candidates to initiate osteoporosis treatment (mean a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naranjo, Antonio, Prieto-Alhambra, Daniel, Sánchez-Martín, Julián, Pérez-Mitru, Alejandro, Brosa, Max
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9041144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35492806
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S350790
_version_ 1784694483786399744
author Naranjo, Antonio
Prieto-Alhambra, Daniel
Sánchez-Martín, Julián
Pérez-Mitru, Alejandro
Brosa, Max
author_facet Naranjo, Antonio
Prieto-Alhambra, Daniel
Sánchez-Martín, Julián
Pérez-Mitru, Alejandro
Brosa, Max
author_sort Naranjo, Antonio
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of a Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) compared with standard care for the secondary prevention of fragility fractures in Spain. METHODS: Patients with osteoporosis and an initial fragility fracture who were candidates to initiate osteoporosis treatment (mean age 65 years, 90.7% female) were included in the model. Disease progression was simulated with a Markov model through seven health states (with and without osteoporosis treatment, subsequent hip, vertebral, forearm and humerus fracture, and death). A time horizon of 10 years and a 6-month duration per cycle was set. Clinical, economic, and quality of life parameters were estimated from the literature and Spanish clinical practice. Resource use and treatment patterns were validated by an expert panel. The Spanish National Health System (SNS) perspective was adopted, taking direct costs (€; 2020) into account. Effectiveness was measured in life-years gained (LYG) and quality-adjusted life years gained (QALYs). A discount rate of 3% was applied to costs and outcomes. The uncertainty of the parameters was assessed using deterministic, scenario and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (1000 iterations). RESULTS: Setting up a FLS for the secondary prevention of fragility fractures in Spain would provide better osteoporosis treatment initiation and persistence. This would reduce subsequent fragility fractures, disutilities and deaths. FLS would have greater clinical benefits (0.008 and 0.082 LYG and QALY gained per patient, respectively) and higher costs (€563.69 per patient) compared with standard care, leading to an incremental cost-utility ratio of €6855.23 per QALY gained over the 10 years horizon. The sensitivity analyses showed limited dispersion of the base case results, corroborating their robustness. CONCLUSION: From the SNS perspective and considering Spanish willingness-to-pay thresholds, the introduction of FLS for the secondary prevention of fragility fractures would be a cost-effective strategy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9041144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90411442022-04-27 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fracture Liaison Services Compared with Standard of Care in the Secondary Prevention of Fragility Fractures in Spain Naranjo, Antonio Prieto-Alhambra, Daniel Sánchez-Martín, Julián Pérez-Mitru, Alejandro Brosa, Max Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Original Research PURPOSE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of a Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) compared with standard care for the secondary prevention of fragility fractures in Spain. METHODS: Patients with osteoporosis and an initial fragility fracture who were candidates to initiate osteoporosis treatment (mean age 65 years, 90.7% female) were included in the model. Disease progression was simulated with a Markov model through seven health states (with and without osteoporosis treatment, subsequent hip, vertebral, forearm and humerus fracture, and death). A time horizon of 10 years and a 6-month duration per cycle was set. Clinical, economic, and quality of life parameters were estimated from the literature and Spanish clinical practice. Resource use and treatment patterns were validated by an expert panel. The Spanish National Health System (SNS) perspective was adopted, taking direct costs (€; 2020) into account. Effectiveness was measured in life-years gained (LYG) and quality-adjusted life years gained (QALYs). A discount rate of 3% was applied to costs and outcomes. The uncertainty of the parameters was assessed using deterministic, scenario and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (1000 iterations). RESULTS: Setting up a FLS for the secondary prevention of fragility fractures in Spain would provide better osteoporosis treatment initiation and persistence. This would reduce subsequent fragility fractures, disutilities and deaths. FLS would have greater clinical benefits (0.008 and 0.082 LYG and QALY gained per patient, respectively) and higher costs (€563.69 per patient) compared with standard care, leading to an incremental cost-utility ratio of €6855.23 per QALY gained over the 10 years horizon. The sensitivity analyses showed limited dispersion of the base case results, corroborating their robustness. CONCLUSION: From the SNS perspective and considering Spanish willingness-to-pay thresholds, the introduction of FLS for the secondary prevention of fragility fractures would be a cost-effective strategy. Dove 2022-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9041144/ /pubmed/35492806 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S350790 Text en © 2022 Naranjo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Naranjo, Antonio
Prieto-Alhambra, Daniel
Sánchez-Martín, Julián
Pérez-Mitru, Alejandro
Brosa, Max
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fracture Liaison Services Compared with Standard of Care in the Secondary Prevention of Fragility Fractures in Spain
title Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fracture Liaison Services Compared with Standard of Care in the Secondary Prevention of Fragility Fractures in Spain
title_full Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fracture Liaison Services Compared with Standard of Care in the Secondary Prevention of Fragility Fractures in Spain
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fracture Liaison Services Compared with Standard of Care in the Secondary Prevention of Fragility Fractures in Spain
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fracture Liaison Services Compared with Standard of Care in the Secondary Prevention of Fragility Fractures in Spain
title_short Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fracture Liaison Services Compared with Standard of Care in the Secondary Prevention of Fragility Fractures in Spain
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of fracture liaison services compared with standard of care in the secondary prevention of fragility fractures in spain
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9041144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35492806
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S350790
work_keys_str_mv AT naranjoantonio costeffectivenessanalysisoffractureliaisonservicescomparedwithstandardofcareinthesecondarypreventionoffragilityfracturesinspain
AT prietoalhambradaniel costeffectivenessanalysisoffractureliaisonservicescomparedwithstandardofcareinthesecondarypreventionoffragilityfracturesinspain
AT sanchezmartinjulian costeffectivenessanalysisoffractureliaisonservicescomparedwithstandardofcareinthesecondarypreventionoffragilityfracturesinspain
AT perezmitrualejandro costeffectivenessanalysisoffractureliaisonservicescomparedwithstandardofcareinthesecondarypreventionoffragilityfracturesinspain
AT brosamax costeffectivenessanalysisoffractureliaisonservicescomparedwithstandardofcareinthesecondarypreventionoffragilityfracturesinspain